Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

mevander

Dormant
  • Content Count

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by mevander

  1. I've used UV-glues from Norton Adhesives in several different projects here at the university. It works pretty well and they have glues that are both heat and UV-curable which is great for parts that only partly are UV-transparent. You can find them here: http://www.techoptics.com/adhesives/optical-adhesives I can also recommend getting a hand-held UV-lamp like the dentists use. It's very convenient when gluing small stuff. In Sweden you can find it here: http://www.brotech.se/fusion-curing-light-blue/2960-0
  2. That looks very nice. We've had problems with voids/defects in the nylon if we go over 230C. I'm guessing it's due to water in the nylon but we've tried to dry it in a 50C over so many times but it still doesn't get better. We also store it in an airtight box with desiccant beads with color indicators. Do you have any good recipe for drying it?
  3. I'm curious to how they define heat resistant. Normally you state a glass transition temperature since it's a thermoplastics. Do they really mean that they have a Tg of 90C? Then it would be pretty interesting but also makes me wonder what the recommended printing temperature is? I guess I'll have to test it and see
  4. Have you checked that your side fans are really running? I had a similar print and the connector for my fans had jumped out so I didn't have any cooling during the print. I didn't notice this until way later ...
  5. Cura 14.09 in OS X. Should I post pictures of the results?
  6. It seems that once you go over 0.15 mm layer height the lines are shown as separated in the analyzer. I'm guessing this might be on purpose to take into account that more material will "flatten" itself more?
  7. I also checked the gcodes with http://gcode.ws/ showing interesting stuff. Ooh, that was an interesting site. I can't claim to understand gcode very well but if I slice a cube and leave all settings except change the layer height from 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm, the site goes from showing me a solid rectangle to a rectangle with separated lines. Should it look like that?
  8. Hmm, would this mean that there is something critical in the head assembly that can create enough extra friction to make the feeder slip in a "normal" range of printing parameters?
  9. Yes, I did experiment with loosening all of them and trying to just loosen the one closest to the hotend. It still went back to separating lines after 2-3 layers.
  10. I tested this "trick" and while I see a temporary effect that improves the print, the threads go back to separating after a few layers.
  11. Thanks Bas, that was very interesting. I think that one difference is that what we see here is at fairly low flow rates. My test box was printed at 4 mm^3/s and we've seen it at much lower flowrates too. If we go really slow, 0.05-0.1 mm layers at 20 mm/s we get very nice prints but that is also the only settings we can use more or less.
  12. Ok, here's some new input from me. I did a test today with a test cube that always produces gaps. I printed it at 220 C and marked the filament at the beginning and the end of the print. I then did the same thing but let the filament go out into the air (without bowden tube or anything). I also took pictures of the filament pattern on the two runs. The amount of filament that was pushed through the hotend when printing the cube was 44.4 mm while the amount for the free filament was 51.3 mm! Cura says that it is supposed to be 51 mm. In other words, there seems to be a fairly large amount of
  13. Thansk for the more detailed underextrusion explanation. I've tested the temperature and that is not the problem in my case. I've also tested measuring the temperature inside the hotend (without filament in there of course) and was a bit surprised to see it being 20C higher than what the machine thermocouple measured. I'm still measuring at a different place than the machine so I'm not too surprised that it didn't match but rather by the large difference in temperature . I've previously seen that when pushing the filament towards the feeder rather forcefully, separating lines can merge again
  14. Same here. Can't print anything above 0.1 mm layer and 20 mm/s without getting open surfaces and have no problems getting 10 mm^3/s with the test cylinders. I feel that we're moving in circles here :(
  15. And the previous round of test cubes that went round in this thread had 0.8 mm shell as far as I remember.
  16. Just wanted to let you know that we're currently playing around with measuring the actual diameters of the hotends (the two we have were 0.412 and 0.46) and slicing the files with different nozzle diameters. So far it hasn't resulted in very much, we're still getting separating lines already at the 4th or 5th layer. I should probably also mention that we've now swapped machine to another one and it unfortunately ended up having the same problems ...
  17. I just wanted to point out that this is not a problem that is connected to the top surface. We see this from the third or forth layer from the bed and upwards. It also seems to be surfacing on more and more machines which is very interesting.
  18. Thanks, I'll look into it and if I find something very interesting I'll try to remember to post it here as well
  19. No, you're absolutely right. I think that the point here was that rather than ordering expensive implants to test them you could do design and some tests with the simpler systems and then order a "real" printed implant when you had something you wanted to look more closely at. I think I read somewhere that Taulman was working on a certified medical grade nylon that would be very interesting. It would be one step closer to something I would trust more at least
  20. People have been discussing about testing both microfluidic chips or components of them that handle cells as well as some parts of a culture chamber where cells are expected to proliferate and be happy. I also had a colleague who work with implanting bone replacements in small animals who was a bit curious if it would be possible to model, print, test mechanically and implant designs.
  21. I was under the impression that XT had FDA compliance for contact with food but not more than that? But that might have been what you meant
  22. Hi. As I'm working with biomedical engineering, I've been getting some questions from colleagues regarding biocompatible materials for the ultimaker. I've understod that PLA actually is fairly biocompatible but it is also not as strong as we would like. Can anyone recommend other materials that would be ok for contact with living cells? Cheers Mikael
  23. Sure, my initial values were 12.15, 1.00 and 37.02. My new values were 10.86, 0.7 and 42.37. I was hoping that this would solve my problems with top surfaces that doesn't touch but it didn't unfortunately. At least the temperature is stable now ...
  24. I updated the PID settings with the variables I got from running the test at 150C and the temperature during a 210C run is much more stable now at least. It seems to be fluctuating between 209 and 210 so that's a huge improvement.
  25. Maybe that can explain some of my weird results I've been getting lately. However, normally when printing the sensor updates the temperature every second or so and it seems to be more or less correct temperature at least (I've checked with a probe). For some reason my printer seems to be a drama queen ...
×
×
  • Create New...