Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by geert_2

  1. I think you can clamp the bowden tube with pneumatic clamps/fittings. I guess the bowden tube is a standard size, but maybe imperial? Your tubing might have a different outer diameter. And then you would need to design some sort of housing for that clamp, and mount that housing next to the feeder. See the pneumatic fittings in the image below (the ones with a thread).
  2. Watermarks do reduce strength of the model, obviously, since there is no material there, and the gaps might concentrate stresses. Apart from that, I never had issues with internal watermarks. Except if the hollows are too big, and their "roof" doesn't close very well: then you see some spaghetti or grape-like blobs sagging inside. And if they are too deep into the model, they become invisible or blurred, due to the layer lines acting as a blur filter. But this is just cosmetic. In my keychains above, it hasn't caused any mechanical or software-trouble. Originally I made watermarks
  3. My experience is that usually I have to drill out holes anyway, because of occasional little blobs, strings and hairs. I also tend to make them 0.5mm wider in CAD than necessary: thus 4.5mm for a 4mm hole to slide an M4 bolt through. And then I *manually* drill it out (see photo). This only takes a few seconds. No electric drilling, especially not in PLA, because it melts immediately.
  4. I have seen this problem too in long prints: while printing, the model sticks to the glass very well: no lifting/warping at all. But after removal, it starts to deform slightly. And indeed, for PLA usually the center "lifts" half a mm, if you put it on a flat table. So this must be due to residual cooling stresses in the material, which are not enough to pull the part off the glass, but enough to slightly bend it. However, I don't have a good solution: warming it up again to release the stresses, tends to make things worse, far worse. I have had models warp upwards on the edges. Or
  5. With an ohm-meter, try measuring if the nozzle is grounded indeed. (Edit: do this only when the printer is switched off, and disconnected from the mains supply, of course!) But glass itself is easily charged, so there is always a possibility that heat and airflow do charge the glass and the lower part of the print, even if the nozzle would be grounded. Or by pulling the print off the glass. This is guessing, but I think the main charge on models will come from post-processing: grinding, cutting off defects,... And it will depend a lot on the material. Do dust and small
  6. Yes, exactly the same as I use; found it in a car accessory shop. :-) If you want to remove moisture from already bad filament, I think it is best to use both: a big bag of silica gel, in a hot environment (a sealed box on a heated printer bed, or in a computer-controlled oven). The elevated temperature might be necessary to dislodge the moisture from the filament. But be sure to stay below the glass transition temp of the filament, so it does not deform or melt. And then, once dry, store it in a closed box or bag with the silica gel.
  7. The purpose is to reduce inertia. Each gram less improves print quality, because you get less vibration, less "ringing" around corners, less overextrusion at corners (the nozzle can accelerate and decelerate faster), and you can print faster. A drive motor weights a lot, compared to the rest of the head. If the head is lighter, the gantry can also be made lighter, which further improves print quality.
  8. I would suggest you first practice your soldering skills on a broken harddisk or USB memory stick, or whatever else broken equipment with similar small chips. The main risks are that you damage the contacts on the board while desoldering, and next that you make short-circuits while soldering. Search on Youtube for tutorial videos, as there are a few tricks that can help. A video can say more than 1000 words. :-)
  9. I think the underlying cause of the printer-interruption you experienced, is that when a computer reboots, its USB-bus is always reset. But I am not a programmer, and I don't know if attached USB-equipment is supposed to be reset too? Or is it allowed to ignore the bus-reset? An argument pro resetting is that when a device is hung-up, it is reset and freed again, one of the purposes of rebooting. But for long 3D-prints, yes it can be inconvenient...
  10. This one has nice translucent colors. Maybe you can polish it a little bit, and brush off the white residu, but leave it unpainted?
  11. I have designed a compact spoolholder for myself, but it only fits one standard spool (Ultimaker, colorFabb). So, in its current form it won't work for you. But you are free to re-use the basic concept, and adapt it to your needs: you will have to make it bigger, and stronger, so it can support the extra weight. It uses one standard 608 bearing (=same as in most skate boards), which is centered. Keep in mind that frictionless spool holders also have a disadvantage: the spool may unwind by itself, especially near the end, if wound too tight. So you may need to provide extra guards t
  12. If it is a "brand new" printer from 2017(?), maybe the filament has just gone bad? It is well known that PLA gets harder and more brittle over time due to internal crystal changes, and PVA absorbs water and then may fail too. Or maybe there is something else you overlooked or were unfamiliar with, for example some settings? Or there might be a manufacturing defect indeed? I would suggest you do a test print, and show *exactly* which settings you used, and show what the results were, both while printing and afterwards, with good close-up photos, and with all the files (STL, project,
  13. It looks like the even and uneven layers consistently are shifted half a mm? But both are still present, it seems. Are both nozzles seated correctly in their holders, without any play? Or is the switching mechanism causing the issue? Maybe you can see if there is any play, if you watch closely while making a small test print? But I don't have a dual nozzle printer, so I am just guessing.
  14. If you look at the layer-view in Cura, I suppose it shows support in those areas? If so, it looks like there was no support at all in the areas where the spaghetti occured? Maybe the PVA-nozzle clogged and stopped extruding PVA, or there was huge underextrusion? (Too wet PVA?) But I don't have a printer with dual extrusion, so I can't give much suggestions for handling.
  15. Yes that is going to have an effect. The bigger the contact area of the bottom layer, the better it is going to stick. And the smaller the design elements, the easier they can bridge gaps without turning into spaghetti. I don't know the official terminology, but usually I speak about "raised" or "recessed" text or design features. So if the recessed seems to work better, definitely try that.
  16. The purpose of printing via SD card is to completely separate your printer from your computer, so they can't influence each other. Whatever you do on the computer, can't have any effect on the printer, as there is no connection. Or maybe you forgot to disconnect the USB-cable?
  17. In your photos, the next layers have nothing to stick to, so they print in the air and are dragged around. You need to find a way to make them stick. It is like when the glass bed is calibrated wrong, and you have too much distance between nozzle and bed. What about trying this method: - make sure your nozzle is rather close to the glass bed, so the first layer is squished very well into the glass, - make the indentations 0.11mm deep in the CAD design, - make the first layer 0.10mm thick in Cura, - make the following layers 0.2 or 0.3mm thick in Cura,
  18. What about printing this model flat on its back? Then there are no bridges, and no drooping spaghetti? Just rotate it 90° in Cura. Otherwise, if you do not use support, then on the highest point of the bridge, the filament will allways sag because a molten plastic (liquid) can not keep its shape without support. It needs a base to glue itself to, such as a solid previous layer.
  19. Maybe this behaviour is because sometimes the outer wall encloses multiple inner walls at once? For example when printing a lot of small circles touching each other. Then the inner walls may all be separate circles, but the outer wall might enclose them all at once. So it is just one uninterrupted outline. Just guessing, but I could see this as a reason. Edit: or vice-versa, as in this picture below: here the outer walls around the holes are separate circles, but the inner wall is one long connected outline.
  20. I have used this concept before when printing large overhangs. It was based on an idea of another user, but I forgot his name (might have been smartavionics?). It works very well, even with only a few connecting strands. My strands were 1mm long, 0.5mm wide, and 0.2mm high (=2 layers of 0.1mm). Inverted triangles to generate support do not work well for small layer-heights of 0.1mm: they tend to curl up too much. Inverted staircases (1mm steps) worked better for me. See the pics. So, depending on the design, this method can be very usefull. Inverted triangle
  21. I tried doing this manually: cut both ends at 90° angles, hold them together in a custom device (see pic below), heat a knife in a flame, put the hot knife inbetween both filament ends and melt them, remove knife, push both molten ends together, and let cool. Then you need to grind away the flange at the seam, otherwise it will not pass through the bowden tube and nozzle. You need to melt both ends to get a good bonding, then it is almost as strong as new. This method works and can especially be usefull for artistic purposes: to melt lots of different colors together. B
  22. Maybe there are different infill patterns, or infill percentages, in which the nozzle follows a different traject with less starts and stops, and less jumps? I don't know if this is possible, but just guessing. Check this in layer view in Cura, before printing.
  23. It appears that OpenGL is coming with the graphics drivers. OpenGL is a specification to which drivers and hardware have to adhere, it is not a driver by itself. I am just echoing what I read on internet here (and hope it is correct), I am not a programmer. :-) So the latest graphics driver should give the latest version, if the hardware supports it. And if the manufacturer delivers new drivers for your system. Search for: "windows how to update opengl". Also there might be incompatible or buggy drivers, so in such cases you might need to try a different version, higher or lower
  24. On the older spools that I have, the material is indicated: PS (=polystyreen). Other spools might be ABS, PC,... But I don't know about the newest spools. So yes, these old spools should be recyclable perfectly. (But I am not an Ultimaker representative, just a user, so this is not official.) But even if the spool would not be recycled, but only recollected in the general "rest" fraction of garbage, and be burned, it is probably still way more environmentally friendly than glass or cardboard. Cardboard requires killing lots of trees to produce it. And glass
  25. You will have to do that in a 3D-CAD program. Cura is a slicer, not a 3D-editor.
  • Create New...