Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


kmanstudios last won the day on July 14

kmanstudios had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,115 Excellent


About kmanstudios

  • Rank
    Veni, Vidi Feci

Personal Information

  • Country
  • Industry
    (Product) design
    R&D / Exploration

Recent Profile Visitors

5,687 profile views
  1. He is on a Draft original setting. So I am thinking tighter line heights. Also to change the structure you would want to avoid curves that are too shallow to get a good resolution unless you go very tight with line height as well as using Adaptive Layers. Depends on what your design requires as to how to construct the geometry needed.
  2. Be mindful of the gaps at the bottom. One wall on low slopes, like on the bottom and top areas, will leave gaps between lines. You can see it in the slice. But a slight change in topography and that could be easily solve the issue.
  3. That tells me that something went wrong at that stage in your original model. When I taught 3D graphics, I used to tell people to just start over. You will waste less time and learn more, establishing solid working practices. You did that by making the new box and manipulating it instead of righting an error filled model. That is half the battle right there. Would like to see a pic of the print. 🙂
  4. You could always try spiralize. Just spitballing here.
  5. Or use a mesh based system that will apply a shell in a way that works. There are give and takes on each program. Learning how and why each program does what it does is key. Choosing the program for what you want to do is going to follow that key. Since this was a mesh based object, I treated it as such. It is teeny weeny though. Should be an interesting print at the scale it came in as. Anyway, here is your sphere with hole fixed. It is now a proper 3D object. Without the depth of the wall, it was a mere 2D object. spherewithhole3D.STL This is a single
  6. I did not get gaps with the pyramid 5 or 6. I think the person just 'cut' pyramid 6 at various heights and left little gaps in the process. You can see in my prints that I had a solid base and no gaps. Spiralize only prints one wall. All prints were done with spiralize. More detailed = more dense. But I reconsidered and figured that pyramids 4 and 5 are just cut versions of pyramid 6 by cutting off the bottom parts. Printed at .2 mm layer height in all prints I made. Yep...bad typo on my part. I am leaving in the typo so that your com
  7. This is the 'slam it through as fast as you can' print of Pyramid 4. Again, could use some tweaking. Spiralized with smoothing turned off.
  8. OK, so this is the print of Pyramid 5. There is very little difference between the two methods of spiralize. One with smoothing on (left side) and one with smoothing off (right Side). Not really much difference. Could have tweaked the settings to get the top to print better, but it was not the issue. Also lousy trimming of the brim. However, after re-reading the OP, I noticed it did mention using Pyramid 4 and I found the issue immediately: Here you can see that a straight slice produces the holes, or gaps. I used Cura 4.8, but have no expectation that there would be any
  9. My print came out fine. If you take a look at the one that was printed (Pyramid 6) on Thingiverse, you can see it has much larger areas to work with. I printed Pyramid 5 and it looked fine other than the layer height. If one wanted to, one could play with line width and layer height for a more refined print.
  10. I just pulled my first print of pyramid 5 and I see no holes as the OP suggests. It is the one that I left on the smooth spiralized contours. I am now printing one with that setting turned off. The first print seemed only present an issue with the layer height.....I just slammed it through with Fast- 0.2mm layer height. I am sure it would look better on visual 0.6 layer height. I will post comparison pics when second print is done. That will be just over two hours from now since the print just started.
  11. I took a deep dive into the files. They all passed the 3DS MAX stl check...so good there The print used in the photo on the link is Pyramid 6 You can tell by the size I am guessing that you printed Pyramid by the density of the iterative triangles and the size I am now printing out pyramid 5 *just over 2 hours just to see what happened. Full disclosure is that I am printing on an S5 (r1) and not a prusa and I used Arachne engine just for kicks and giggles. I also sliced using spiralize and 0% infill as suggested.
  12. Which pyramid are you printing? There are three in the zip folder.
  13. Ahhhh, ok, so you know a 3|D program. Bravo! As for the skeleton being 'chubby', try to use very small increments of horizontal expansion if you need it. I have gotten away with .05mm before. Just enough to beef up the size, but not really enough to notice. You can also go into 'per model settings' and apply almost any setting per model itself. Say select the sword and perform one tiny amount and then select the skeleton and apply a different amount.
  • Create New...