Jump to content

dxp

Member
  • Posts

    234
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dxp

  1. Guess so. And i did not care for the fundamental Linux-Rule: make a copy first, then fill in your typos 🙂 Still, i'm a little puzzled, because the bondtech-value of 311 produces visible underextrusion. And it was not that easy to figure out how to extrude 100mm. Yes, this stuff is not intended to be managed by the user and I'm very glad, the Ultimaker-Machines are really Plug-and-Print.
  2. I can confirm this behaviour. But unfortunately have no solution, yet.
  3. Guess it is still the nozzle distance... do you have a piece of paper with 0,1 or 0,15mm to level? Use that on your heated printer. After that: move the cube to one corner in front, slice with brim (and a 60°C bed temperature) and start the print. Turn the level knob on that corner carefully while printing until the melted plastic sticks to the bed. You will get a feeling of how to correct the other knobs. Keep in mind not to turn too much, cause 4 knobs is actually one too much - the bed base will deform to much. Some people print a rectangle in the size of their printing area and correct the bed level while printing on all 4 corners - you have to be fast 😉 Good luck! (If possible, you can preheat nozzle and bed for PLA and extrude by hand - but i dont know the extruder on your machine. It's s trick for a bondtech clone on my ender 3)
  4. Hello @Cymon, thanks for that workaround. I'll try a similar approach.
  5. Thanks @nallath - that is what i feared 🙁 So I start from scratch with the predefined profiles, integrate my defaults (like Combing-Not in Skin, Initial Layer Expansion ...) ,give it a go and add some finetuning. You're right, some Settings were Material-Specific (like a slow speed for Layer Adhesion) and others depend on the printer (like slow speed for aesthetics). Sadly sometimes i dont remember, what parameter i changed months ago and why. (Note to myself: keep a log!) Thanks!
  6. Hello, after successfully using an Ultimaker 3 Extended for 2 years, we were honored with a S5. 🥂 But all these customized and fine-tuned profiles are not available on the S5. How can I migrate them to the S5 or better: how can I share the same Profile between the printers? If not possible, how to relieve the pain and transfer the overrides to the S5? Maybe I could use the 3mf-Files with Save Project and import it to S5? Cheers, dxp
  7. Maybe a combination of Per-Model-Settings and One-at-a-Time can help.
  8. So ist es. Für PETG nimmt man das generische CPE, der Rest erklärt sich von selbst. Aber wie Smithy sagte: man kommt da schnell mal durcheinander. Lieber als Projekt per File-Save... sichern, dann hat man die Slicer-Einstellungen gleich mit dabei.
  9. Well, now it got me. What did i do? I had the impression of underextrusion with the Bondtech-Update and 311 Steps/mm. So i measured and corrected to 327 after reading this thread: Now i got the correct extrusion of 100mm. But i lost the material list on my printer. By now i tried a factory reset on the printer - still no material list. The Message is "No profiles for an Ultimaker 3 unkown". The printer recognizes itself as "Hardware type ID: 9511" - a UM3 Extended, and that is true. But "Type: Ultimaker 3 unknown" is wrong. And it also complains about a non-compatibility of black ABS with printcore AA 0.4. I can load UM-Material (NFC-magic!) I found: 1 - Firmware-Version is 5.2.11.20190503 - no downgrade with USB possible. This firmware worked fine until today. 2 - the printer shows itself as Hardware type ID 9511 at the printer. But he seems to miss something. As far as I understand, the printer reads um3.json (with Ultimaker 3 unknown) and finetunes it with 9511.json to Ultimaker 3 extended. How can i reset to a plain latest firmware? Well, i downloaded https://download.ultimaker.com/releases/firmware/stable/5.2.11.20190503/um-update-5.2.11.20190503.swu and installed it via USB (had to scroll a bit). Then filling the Bondtech corrections into um3.json and moveMaterialProcedures.py Phew! Maybe a typo somewhere. Glad i could solve it myself. 🧐
  10. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Mache ich dann in einem neuen Thread Ende August.🏖️
  11. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Und wir hattendie Woche Besuch aus Österreich... 🙂 @Smithy : in der Firma hatten wir mal 3DXTech CarbonX 2.85 mm Polycarbonat - eine extreme Spannkraft. Kaum zu biegen. Bisher nur kleine Teile. Leider. Es fehlt die Anwendung. Daheim wartet eine Rolle PA-CF Low Warp von Colorfabb auf meine Rückkehr aus dem Urlaub (Rügen!), der Ender 3 ist nun umgebaut und kann 280°C. Wirkliche Tipps aus der Praxis kann ich also nicht geben, man findet leider auch nur wenige Reviews. @all: Schöne Urlaube allerseits!
  12. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Ach: Extrudr und 3DJake sind aus Österreich. Carbon macht Spaß. Und es ist so extrem .... steif, holzig, matt - tolles Material.
  13. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Ja, per Dual-Druck dem nicht leuchtenden weißen Gespenst als zweites Material Leuchtaugen reindrucken. Oder geheime Botschaften in andere Teile, die man nur in der Nacht lesen kann - hach, schöne neue Welt! Viel Spaß und schön, dass es so gut klappt!
  14. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Geil! Jetzt noch Botschaften weiß-in-weiß drucken... 😉
  15. Maybe you could give Repetier Host a try? It works fine with Crealiy-Printers and you could check the USB. If it works, switch to Cura. (But printing directly via USB seems a bad idea, a SD-Card is better in terms of reliability.)
  16. It does look exactly like that! Wow. Soft end stops, how cool is that! Oh, x (Width) was left at 233mm. And yes, i deactivated the second extruder AND set the printer to one extruder. Maybe that puzzled Cura. So, I left x at 233, let the machine have 2 extruders (in printer settings) and deactivated the second extruder at the prepare panel/configurations. That way the option "Once-at-a-time" was available. Then i had to move the most right part 15mm to the left and everything was printable! 🙃 Reducing x would help too, I guess. But fiddling in printer settings back and forth is not my cup of tea. Thank you very much for "tinkering it out", @tinkergnome. And thank you @nallath for your patience!
  17. Maybe the Ultimaker was just polite 🙂 There is really no unneccessary material. Just a sharp cut and a wall. Just checked the gCode - all parts have a brim. But: the slide to simulate the buildup cutted all parts at the same time and ignored the once-at-a-time setting. Maybe just a render-thing in cura. This is a render of the gCode with Repetier Host. It shows the correct printing order, but the used area is larger than 200mm... eeergh.
  18. Nope, i used the first/left extruder. In printer settings i set the number of extruders to 1, the remaining one was Extruder 1. (The last picture is irritating, because EX2 is down. I took the picture with a manually raised bed, and the UM was switching to EX2 for unknown reasons.) Seems like the Ultimaker himself re-computed the gcode for printing a model in half 😀
  19. Well, actually i see no over extrusion... looks like a "healed" cut. The walls are only 2 perimeters by default (which is too thin). But there is no surplus material. I will reprint the last position to see, if there is a mechanical collision. There is no way for Extruder 1 to reach the entire area of the model, the print is cutted. After stopping the print, i raised the build plate and moved the head to the print. The head is 1mm away from the chassis. Nozzle 1 is still 1-2cm away from the sliced positions (red vertical line). The right nozzle could help... kidding. Maybe the bounding box is too small?
  20. Hello, printing "once at a time" seems tricky: the preview was perfect, but in the end, the last part (in the lower left) was cut in half. The cutting area was even closed with a nice wall! Pics are included as is the 3mf and gcode. The number of extruders was set to 1. I'm not asking for help, just for some hints of how to avoid that. (And yes, these prints are ugly, the TPU95A must be dried.) There was a thread in 2016 with the "print once at a time" topic, now i'm calling for @nallath or @gr5 🙂 The printer setting: UM3E_pUFFER-5er-Gruppe.3mf UM3E_pUFFER-5er-Gruppe.zip
  21. Just discovered: renaming UM3 works. (but how to change language in cura connect?)
  22. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Wir hatten das 2er-Set für ~165€ oMwst. plus Ruby bestellt. Zwei Wochen später kam die CC 😯 Wie gesagt: mit der CC entfällt mindestens eine Fehlerquelle, was im kommerziellen Bereich entscheidend sein kann.
  23. dxp

    Glow in the Dark

    Na, immerhin hat der UM5 schon die gehärteten Extruder-Zahnrädchen. Wir haben hier das 3D Solex HardCore 2 Kit UM3 und 3D Solex Everlast HardCore Nozzle für UM3 0.60mm. Funktioniert soweit ganz gut, beim nächsten Mal würde ich allerdings sofort nach Einbau das manuelle Leveln für alle Druckköpfe machen, weil wir da Probleme mit der Höhe hatten (die Düse lag einfach auf dem Glas auf...) und man dann nochmal beim Hersteller nachhaken kann. Das Erkennen des Kopfes - oder besser des Düsendurchmessers - geht nur manuell, hier kann man sich auch mal ins Knie schießen. Falls das Geld vorhanden und der Sinn nach Originalität und Komfort steht: CC Red. Kann ich aber nichts zu sagen. 350€ finde ich fett.
×
×
  • Create New...