Cuq

Hello I don't think there is a possibility to solve this problem via a parameter. Maybe @ahoeben could give a more accurate answer. The execution of the plugins follow I think the order of loading and the order of loading is according to the alphabetical order First there are the plugins loaded in : <Software>Ultimaker\Ultimaker Cura XXX\share\cura\plugins so PostProcessingPlugin in the first place Then the plugins in : <User>AppData\Roaming\cura\XXX\plugins like LinearAdvanceSettingPlugin or ArcWelderPlugin etc . So if you want to modify this order you can move the Folder PostProcessingPlugin into the User plugins directory or move the LinearAdvanceSettingPlugin into the Software plugins directory . As on a alphabetic order LinearAdvanceSettingPlugin will be loaded before PostProcessingPlugin you will get the right order but it's just a workaround and you will have to do it for every new Cura Installation.

It's an issue with your printer configuration .. I can fix a value of 300mm/s of 600mm/s if I want in cura : In cura the limitation for the maximum Travel Speed is define by : math.sqrt(machine_max_feedrate_x ** 2 + machine_max_feedrate_y ** 2) So it's dependant of the Maximum Speed X & Maximum Speed Y .. Have a look in your printer settings and increase this value if you want to go upper this value. So no it's not a Cura Limitation and if something as change it's a modification made on your printer specific configuration ( Which is not Ultimaker's responsibility if the machine does not come from them)

Finally SimulationView 🙂

Never Give up ! 3 years later. : https://github.com/5axes/CuraSettingsWriter At the same time I learned that you can embedded the image directly in the HTML file.

Custom support

If you want to supress this issue reduce the value of the : Support Horizontal expansion (0.5 should be enough) Or if you want to keep this expansion for the upper support, Increase the Minimum Support Area Value to 10 ( the size of your hole ) . For me it's a bug it's a temporary workaround but should be report on the github ( even if I don't think it will ever become a hight priority )

Strange don't get the same issue. What is your Cura Release ?

Maybe it's Latin "Errare humanum est" ... perseverare diabolicum

A little topic far away from 3D printing. I always have trouble defining icons or graphics for my little Cura plugins. So for once I decided to test the AI with DAll-E 2. I filled in : An icon style image smaller than 0.5 MB with the theme : Plugin Ultimaker Cura for the function Live Scripting It gave me this: I will take the number 2 but I have absolutly no Idea what "Urk Maer Purter" means .. Maybe it has a meaning in Dutch 🤣

I think the issue was the format of the Url. Seems to be correct now currentFolder:pathToUrl(UM.ActiveTool.properties.getValue("ScriptFolder")) function pathToUrl(path) { // Convert the path to a usable url var url = "file:///" url = url + path url = encodeURIComponent(url) // Return the resulting url return url }

I have a small problem but I would like to solve it. In a QML File I use the FileDialog component ... I wanted to be able to define the starting folder using currentFolder : url But unfortunately this does not seem to work. What is the form of the url string ? do I have to do a particular formatting ? I tried with : currentFolder: encodeURIComponent but it's the same ? Any Idea ? Current QML File link : https://github.com/5axes/CuraLiveScriptingPlugin/blob/master/qml_qt6/LiveScripting.qml

OK the solution Change from TextArea to Cura.ScrollableTextArea Cura.ScrollableTextArea { id: inputfg width: parent.width anchors { top: parent.top bottom: runOptions.top } // font.family: "Courier New" textArea.wrapMode: Text.Wrap textArea.textFormat : Text.PlainText textArea.text: UM.ActiveTool.properties.getValue("Script") textArea.onTextChanged: { UM.ActiveTool.setProperty("Script", text) } Keys.onPressed: { if (event.key == Qt.Key_Tab) { insert(cursorPosition, " "); event.accepted = true; } } }

Hello, I'm trying to migrate a plugin that I use in version 4.X but that had not been updated to version 5. In the QML files the plugin defines some items as: TextArea In QT5 version I have scrollbars and mouse selection: With QT6 this doesn't work anymore ... How can we get back these properties or how to replace these items ? Source code of the qml File for QT 6 : https://github.com/5axes/CuraLiveScriptingPlugin/blob/master/qml_qt6/LiveScripting.qml

Your Welcome , And If you want to have more information / Plugin example you can have a look to the Profil Analyse plugin : https://marketplace.ultimaker.com/app/cura/plugins/5axes/ProfilAnalyser And I'm Agree with you there is a huge gaps in knowledge and on documentation for Plugin creation.

https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/wiki/Profiles-&-Settings

If you have a limitation it's not in Cura but in the printer definition. You can change this limitation but if your printer is in the official list they are a chance that you need to do it on every new installation.

Line_Width is not a Global parameter but it is linked with the Extruder Container. ( Each Extruder can have a different line Width ) extrud = Application.getInstance().getGlobalContainerStack().extruderList GetVal = extrud[id_ex].getProperty(key, "value") Where id_ex is the number of the extruder if you have just one extruder id_ex = 0

The nesting algorythm is one point , but the reference shape used to calculate the arrangement is the key for the result. These algorythms use a 2d shape and Cura as well as Prusa I think use the convex2dshape of the model (you can see it it's the grey shape draw on the build plate) as this geometry is a one boundary model, without hole or concav geometry, it's not possible to get some part "inside" an other one. So it's not only a question of nesting calculation but mainly of boundary representation of the part. Find how to calculate a fast exact , external 2d boundary of a 3d model and you will be close to the result.

Finaly regading your request my new plugin "Spoon Anti-warping" seems closer to the initial request : https://github.com/5axes/SpoonAntiWarping If you define the "Handle" ( attach width ) to 0 you can have a very similar result.

Problem solved now there are some spoons in Cura : And regarding Matrix the goal here is to not bend them.

I's On Line : https://marketplace.ultimaker.com/app/cura/plugins/5axes/CustomSupportEraserPlus Thanks to the Ultimaker Team ! And especially @Joey for the tests.

I'm agree with you. And to be sure he should post in this thread the Gcode.

Reason N°1 under-extrusion (there are also gap between the lines themself) , E-step or Flow not correctly calibrated.

It's not because you see a space at the bottom of your part in the SolidView, that there is not the right path in the cutting result.

Like : https://github.com/5axes/CustomSupportEraserPlus