Jump to content

CumpyRules

Dormant
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CumpyRules

  1. Hi, thanks for the replies. Of course, the line width is set to 0.4mm and also the nozzle size. Also if I try to set thinner/bigger lines, for example 0.38 or 0.42 instead 0.4, the nozzle will move 2 times over the Walls, which are 0.4mm. The same result is, when I make the walls thinner than 0.4mm. It can also not be a solution to work with wrong nozzle or wall settings, then I will get other trouble. The problem is to remove the support when the lines are 0.8mm. Greetz CR
  2. Hi @all This is my first post here, and I come up directly with a question... I use Cura since a long time, and I'm sure that it has worked in a previous version. I create the supports for overhangs of my object in the 3D Designer directly and don't use Curas support option for it. My problem is, if I create a wall of 0.4mm (same as nozzle size), Cura create a GCode for two lines for this "wall". I have read this Thread here: https://community.ultimaker.com/topic/20759-how-to-get-cura-to-slice-my-04-mm-walls ... But this is not my problem. I can slice the thin walls, but I get allways a print where my support walls will be printed with a thikness of ~0.8mm, because they will be printed with two rounds of the nozzle. I want to have supports like in the spiralizing mode or Curas Support walls, where the nozzle moves only one times for the support wall. In other slicers is this no problem. Why Cura create a gcode where the nozzle drives two times for the wall ? In the pictrues I have attached, only one line is shown for the support wall, but during the print, two walls will be printed. Greetz CR
  3. Hi @all, So this is my first post, and first I will say a "Hello" to all. ... And Yes, I've seen that the thread is 2 Years old 😉 My question is, whether this feature was already implemented ? I have the problem, that I want to print an I/O cover frame. For this I placed the frontside of the frame to the bed on a glass panel to get a very smooth surface. But in the cover are a lots of holes for the connectors and the printer head have to move to a lot points to start the walls and also for the infill the head must start, stop and move to new start points for printing. Now I had the idea, that I add a completly closed layer with 0.2mm thickness to the model, which I will cut off after printing. I mean, the first layer is a closed surface without holes (This I have add to my model) and after the first layer, it will start with the walls of the lot of holes. The problem is, that when I start the print, the areas in the first layer, where later the walls will be, will printed now first with a closed surface, the moving of the head is in this case the same. If I could disable the walls for the first layer, I would get a evenly distributed matrial output from the print, because it must not move between al lot of new points for extrusion. Especially for covers it would be perfect to get an evenly surface. Greetz CR
×
×
  • Create New...