Jump to content

funx

Member
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by funx

  1. I like the video, it might not be the place to talk about bugs but I'm most pleased with what's been fixed with this release.
  2. Thanks for the advice, it looks like the new board has an older version of marlin on it, I'll try updating it to see if it helps.
  3. Another issue that I'm running into is a blob on the print after resuming from a pause. I think I have diagnosed the issue. Here is a sample of g-code from a print with the pause-blob: Just before the pause: G1 F1800 X94.951 Y119.841 E334.40799 G1 F3000 E327.90799 ;MESH:NONMESH G0 F300 X94.951 Y119.841 Z0.8 G0 F9000 X98.742 Y100.597 ;TIME_ELAPSED:425.699921 ;TYPE:CUSTOM ;added code by post processing ;script: PauseAtHeight.py ;current layer: 3 M83 ; switch to relative E values for any needed retraction Note that the two G1 lines indicate a retraction of 6.5mm, which is what I have set as my retraction distance in the slicer settings. Here's the very end of the pause: M82 ; switch back to absolute E values G92 E327.90799 ;LAYER:3 M117 Layer 3 of 5 CE3PRO_mgschip_test M106 S153 ;TYPE:WALL-INNER ;MESH:mgschip_test.stl G1 F3000 E334.40799` The G92 line is using the retracted value. The printer does not realize this and does an extrude right onto the print. Perhaps there is a way the script could compare the two most recent absolute E positions and use the larger of the two?
  4. I recently installed a silent motherboard for my Ender 3 Pro only to realize that it no longer stayed paused with the standard M0 command. Does anyone know what might be the cause for this? After some tinkering, I discovered that it worked when given the expire time parameter (ex. M0 S120). I made a modified version of the Pause at Height script that allows you to specify the expire time and thought I'd share it in case anyone else was experiencing the same issue. PauseAtHeight2.zip
  5. Still having issues with this in the latest version: https://webm.red/0fA4 It seems to stem from how Cura only transforms along the world axes, which does not work well with things that have been rotated. This becomes especially problematic when trying to adjust a support blocker after rotating the parent object. The handles may no longer correspond to the axis being scaled, and often a skew will be introduced. Is there no option to have the scale/rotation handles orient themselves relative to an object's rotation? If not, is this feature planned at all? I'm new to 3d printing and Cura is the first slicer I've tried using. I've made several successful prints, but this rotation/scale issue is causing mounting frustration
×
×
  • Create New...