Jump to content

BA2

New member
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • 3D printer
    Other 3D printer

BA2's Achievements

1

Reputation

  1. It seem to be strong and good print the one from creality slicer, so i think those settings are fine for this model. Do you know what the dynamic quality profile does? It seems that this profile print the model with variable line width (?) I would love to learn what setting that is on to make it "dynamic quality". Somehow the line width property does not apply or at least only serves as a base-setting?
  2. You solved it!!! 1 @GregValiant Fill gaps changed from everywhere gave me an estimate of 7:30 ish 2 @gr5 Dynamic quality do change line width through out the model. And I guess there will be a lot of 3 passes instead of 2 on walls thats not an multiple of nozzle. Change to standard quality and then change to same 0.16 layer height gave me a estimate of 5:30. This is about spot on as cura is often a bit high on the estimates. Thanks a lot. I've learned a lot and now I don't need to have this nagging feeling that i need to use this old version of creality slicer.
  3. My nozzle is 0.4 and linewidths are 0.4. A good clue, but it is already a multipple. Edit: Wait a minute. What exactly do dynamic quality do?? That might not give me control over the linewidth?
  4. Beeing a newbe here, I learn a lot from you guys!! I will look into the factors you point out. I did the testprint with the cura sliced gcodefile, and it took 10:13. Then i used the pen-move feature in cura and made a video of a the nozzle behaviour. Then i imported the gcode from creality slicer and did screncapture from that too. I can see that cura is making this extra line (yellow) inbetween the walls. Is this the 3-passes you are talking about @gr5 And i guess this can explain this extra length too? (I fasttracked creality one a bit to get to about the same spot on both)
  5. And: Cura does print 57mm from 1mm filement and creality prints 37mm
  6. It clearly is two different ways of printing the same STL-file. I would love to find why this is happening. I did find a couple of settings that is different: One is the top and bottom/top thicknes the other was combing mode. none of them made any difference. I will do a printout of the cura sliced slug to find out how much off the cura-estimate is. The creality print used 5:16, so one more hour than estimated.
  7. I sort of stumbled upon that analyser in the search for an explanation here 🙂 I found the combing settings in creality after your tip to check the menues. It was set to "all" in creality and "not in skin" in cura. Changing it to "all" did not do any difference. I'm not able, however, to find Jerk and Acceleration in creality. Combing Its not easy to compare settings in those two, because Creality do have fewer settings. I did print the creality sliced slug and that was 5:16 in actual print time, so that closes the gap with one hour. I will do a print with cura too, just to check how "off" the estimates are.
  8. I find that compared with Cura some models prints a lot faster when sliced with the creality-slicer that was shiped with my Ender 3 pro. Creality slicer is a customized version of an early Cura version, so I find that strange. This model ends up with more than double estimated print time!!! https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4945700 I used https://www.gcodeanalyser.com/ and get this results: (I have tried to make the settings as equal as possible in the two slicers) Ultimaker Cura Slicer result to the left Creality slicer to the right
×
×
  • Create New...