Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Professional'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


3D printing forums

  • General
    • Official news
    • Ultimaker.com feedback
  • Ultimaker products
    • Ultimaker 3D printers
    • Ultimaker Software
    • Ultimaker Marketplace
    • Third party products & modifications
  • 3D print Questions
    • Improve your 3D prints
    • Design for Additive Manufacturing
    • Industries
  • Ultimaker Academy e-learning
    • General questions e-learning
    • Courses & learning plans
    • Request a course
  • User Lounge
    • What have you made
    • Coffee corner
    • Buying or selling your Ultimaker
  • Languages
    • Nederlands
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Japanese - 日本語
    • Other Languages

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


3D printer


About Me


Country


Industry


On The Web

  1. Hi. How to save per model settings in cura? So that they are always visible and that I do not have to select them manually every time I add a support lock?
  2. 最近我在使用最新cura 12.1软件,它在打印机结束代码前面会自动增加一段长距离的回抽。 1、这是我的打印机结束代码设置 M104 S0 M140 S0 G92 E0 G1 E-10 F2000 G28 X0 Y0 M84 2、然后我用cura切片,在结束代码的前面,它自动增加了四行代码 G1 F1500 E112.5943 M140 S0 M204 S500 M107 第1行代码导致料被大幅度回抽。 第4行代码M107已经不被marlin推荐使用 3、我尝试换别的模型,也存在同样的情况。 G1 F1500 E3768.34114 M140 S0 M204 S500 4、但奇怪的是,前两周我打印还是完全正常的。这让我十分困惑。。。
  3. Hi, i have a huge problem with a (almost) closed body print and its support. I want to print a case for my Zigbee Lan Gateway (attached). The walls are printed really good but as it gets to the support the whole print it getting a chaos. The printer tried to print the support in the air (about 1mm from the ground) but i set the "Support Z Distance to 0.2 mm. I'm not printing that much, but till now the supports where printed ok. So i have no clue what's the problem. I tried 5 prints with a little different settings and changed to a new nozzle. I leveled the printer (Artillery X1) 3 times but the result was every time the same. I attached the whole profile. Does anyone have a hint? Best Regards. Protheus Body by Alex.F.stl PETG (Geetech) Cura Profile.curaprofile
  4. kstorck

    Plugin

    Hi All, I'm new to the 3D world. And I hope to can get some help with the following question. Is there a plugin in cure where the print can get text on itself, for example a name or number. Thank you 🙂
  5. I noticed that the printer page does not display necessary changes anymore in order to start a print job. Errors like End-of-material and others seem to get displayed fine, but after I send a print job to one of my printers it just told me "ready to print". I had to click on this specific printer to see that changes were necessary. This was used to be displayed just like other errors on the printer page. Did this get changed by purpose?
  6. hi all, i need to use CURA on a windows PC but i cannot install software due to limitations of IT department. is it possible to use CURA as a portable application ? is it possible to install on another windows PC and exports the installations ? i googled a lot but i did't find information on it ? thanks a lot. bye
  7. I am trying to print thing but when I measure them, they are about 1mm to 1.5mm off, on Cura (4.12 or whatever the newest version is) the measurement is correct, but once it's printed, it's off. Im wondering what settings I need to change to fix this. I have left all settings default. The only thing I have changed was infill, and adding/removing raft. Help please.
  8. Hi there I have a bunch of printers set up in the digital facory. They are all ready to print, but are displayed in the digital factory as 'finished, awaiting cleanup'. Restarting doesn't help. Any idea? Cheers Kris
  9. Do you guys know, if there is an option where cura does not stupidly puts support under bridges? It is so annoying to always add dozens of support blocker because the miniumum support xy distance, minimum support area etc are not helping at all. This is always a problem if I need to support small surfaces but have larger surfaces that can be completely bridged. It takes me forever to manually fix the support if I have multiple parts on my S5 print surface. Why are the support structures on the right so huge without supporting anything? This is how I need it, and how I should be able to automatically generate it: I can only get this result after carefully placing support blockers. An because the part has new iterations, with small changes all the time I have to start all over again and cannot use an old project.
  10. I would suggest the support and wire fill
  11. Hello everyone, I would like to know how to calculate the conversion between filling rate and filling spacing. There is another question that needs to be confirmed. Is the unit of coordinate points filled by Curaengine in microns?
  12. Everybody is good, ask a question: after filling line, how to make it in the nozzle, through the algorithm to fill line has order (not print a few lines before and after the jump to the last to print a few section of the line segment, and print the middle line), blocked the place for a long time, ask an expert to help give a train of thought, thank you very much!
  13. Dear Ultimaker, your android app sends a push message when a print starts, which is arguably not very useful (I know when I start a print, since I can only start it by being physically present), and when it's finished (which is marginally more useful). What it doesn't do, is the only thing that would really be useful, i.e. push an alert if something unexpected happens and the printer stops printing. This is really important: if caught and resolved immediately, it can make the difference between a failed and a rescued print. Will you ever make this feature available? Since push alerts are already implemented, I would think that it's not a big effort to add an alert for these situations.
  14. Hello all guys, Recently I have compared the extruded filament width of a new nozzle and after 50h of printing when the nozzle (0.8mm) was new, the filament width after extrusion was about 0.86mm after a 48h print I have measured again and it was extruding a filament of 0.6mm causing under extrusion the first time I have seen that, I thought the nozzle worn out after few months but last week I changed two nozzles because of this reason even with 2-3 cold pull using transparent nylon, the new nozzles still clogged (the outside the nozzle is often cleaned with a brass brush) so, I am wondering if my settings are too much to handle by the extruder/nozzles: I have come up with these settings for print a tube-like shape that must be the most rugged as possible, I don’t mind the bad-looking surface because the pieces are machined in a lathe.... I have followed the suggestions of CNC Kitchen, Teaching Tech, Maker's Muse, MatterHackers to print with 0.8mm nozzle in the most tough way possible: - over extruding (120-130%) - high temperature (240°C) - large line width (1mm) - no cooling - low speeds (16-25mm/s) and so on... (settings file attached) Cura is measuring a max flow rate of 9.75mm3/s in the infill and a minimum of 6mm3/s in the external wall for any additional information please ask 🙂 thanks a lot creatbot F430 - piena+vetr+infill step.curaprofile
  15. Hello, I set my line width to .3mm with a .4mm nozzle. I created some features at .3mm on my part. Cura will smooth over those details until I make them .35mm in size, then they show up. Is Cura defaulting to a line width of .35mm even though I have it set to .3mm?
  16. Hi to all Maybe the subject have been already discussed, but I haven't found an answer yet. Here's my question : I have different type of printers : Ultimaker 3 Extended, Ultimaker S5, BCN3D Epsilon W50 and custom based on RRF (Duet3D) I am currently using Cura 4.11 as a single slicer for all those printers, sharing the material database together and benefiting from the plugins and latests releases. (For those who are interested in how to use standard Cura for BCN3D IDEX, please PM me.) Material parameters like Temperatures, Retraction settings, cooling have to be personalized per printer type. For the Ultimaker family, it's well done and you have a set of parameter for the UM3X and for S5. Is it the same for the custom defined printers ? Are these parameters individualized per machine ? I ask the question because all the print profiles for custom defined printers are available when a custom printer is activated. Thanks for your feedback !
  17. Hi to all Maybe the subject have been already discussed, but I haven't found an answer yet. Here's my question : I have different type of printers : Ultimaker 3 Extended, Ultimaker S5, BCN3D Epsilon W50 and custom based on RRF (Duet3D) I am currently using Cura 4.11 as a single slicer for all those printers, sharing the material database together and benefiting from the plugins and latests releases. (For those who are interested in how to use standard Cura for BCN3D IDEX, please PM me.) Material parameters like Temperatures, Retraction settings, cooling have to be personalized per printer type. For the Ultimaker family, it's well done and you have a set of parameter for the UM3X and for S5. Is it the same for the custom defined printers ? Are these parameters individualized per machine ? I ask the question because all the print profiles for custom defined printers are available when a custom printer is activated. Thanks for your feedback !
  18. I am currently enjoying my 3D printing life with the Ender-3V2 with Volcano 1.0mm nozzle. Using the Cura, I am trying to print shapes where "support" is essential. I'm using it with the "support infill speed" set to 150mm/s and the "support interface speed" set to 20mm/s. In version 4.11.0 of Cura, it is not possible to set the "support wall speed" separately from the "support infill speed". By setting the "support infill speed" faster and the "support wall speed" slower, you can get a faster and cleaner print. This is a huge advantage for many 3D printer users. Please add "support wall speed" to Cura.
  19. Hello there. So the Native CAD import plugin sounds really great and useful. I believe I am not the only one who would like to use it, but is held off by the high subscription price. May I suggest to offer another option for users to get access to this plugin? Maybe the possibility to subscribe to this plugin alone?
  20. is the engineering profile available for Ultimaker 3E or only S3?
  21. Hi, I've tried printing from the library to my S5 a couple times the past few days. Its strange, the printer prints the part fine but it doesn't show status as "printing" but is still "available". This is both on the cloud page and when accessing via the LAN directly. Also, it is printing with the lights off (they are normally on when submitting a print job any other way). Any ideas? I'm on firmware 6.5.1.0 . Thanks!
  22. I'm trying to print 50 of a small part and when I only have one it slices perfectly fine, but when I try and slice all 50, it just doesn't slice. it just stop here and doesn't slice. I've had no problem slicing with larger prints than this
  23. We just bought the Ultimaker S5 but lost the flash drive with the image to test the printer...where can I download the image to test the printer?
  24. I printed an enclosure where Cura seems to have forgotten all about filament retraction and made bridges instead. What would be the cause of this, and how do I avoid it? Regards; /jb
  25. Our workflow prints a high volume of small parts. We would like to engrave/emboss the file name (which is a "job number" in our workflow) onto an exposed portion of the raft during the print. This would allow us to track the part/job through the rest of our post-print workflow. Having it on the raft would not interfere with the part geometry. This can not be done "In CAD" as a single model is printed in many different jobs. Does Cura have some mechanism to print the job # or file name that we are missing? Again, looking for a method that does not interfere with part geometry, but is physically attached on a break-away raft. If not, that would be a nice, business focused request. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...