Jump to content

Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended


Recommended Posts

Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

Hello all, long time lurker, first time poster here.

Apart from the larger print volume, is there any real difference between the Extended and the standard Ultimaker 2 in terms of reliability, print quality, etc?

I really don't think I need the extra build volume; however for reasons I won't bore you with, the Extended will end up costing me pretty much the same as the standard Ultimaker 2.

If there are any concerns about the Extended whatsoever, I would just go with the standard Ultimaker 2.

Cheers,

Matt.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    Everybody I've seen so far with an UM2 Extended was happy with that printer. The build height is the only difference; everything else is the same.

    btw: Those reasons would not bore me at all... ;)

    edit: I think to remember a recent post about print quality comparison of the three UM2 models. Iirc the GO had the best quality in order to its smaller build size.

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    That's great, thank you for the insight. I would be very interested in seeing that thread for the comparison of the three UM2 models if anybody knows where it is off hand?

    I'm willing to believe the quality is the same between the UM2 standard and Extended, however I just wanted to be sure because bigger machine usually means more slop! There is no way I would want to compromise quality/reliability for the extra build volume.

    Cheers,

    Matt.

    P.S. Reason they are the same price (or nearly the same price) to me is because I would be buying them for my business, and the price of the Extended is high enough such that I go over a magic number and I get more of a tax break, effectively making it cost the same as a standard UM2. You see I told you it was boring! :-)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    P.S. Reason they are the same price (or nearly the same price) to me is because I would be buying them for my business, and the price of the Extended is high enough such that I go over a magic number and I get more of a tax break, effectively making it cost the same as a standard UM2. You see I told you it was boring! :-)

     

    Not that boring... you know, Swiss tend to listen when they hear or read the word 'tax'... :D

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    That's great, thank you for the insight. I would be very interested in seeing that thread for the comparison of the three UM2 models if anybody knows where it is off hand?

    I'm willing to believe the quality is the same between the UM2 standard and Extended, however I just wanted to be sure because bigger machine usually means more slop! There is no way I would want to compromise quality/reliability for the extra build volume.

    Cheers,

    Matt.

    P.S. Reason they are the same price (or nearly the same price) to me is because I would be buying them for my business, and the price of the Extended is high enough such that I go over a magic number and I get more of a tax break, effectively making it cost the same as a standard UM2. You see I told you it was boring! :-)

     

    Then I would buy an UM2 extended. Once you master your machine, you'll miss the bigger build volume pretty soon. ;)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    If cost is not a problem, the go for the extended.

    It prints as good as the UM2, it's basically the same machine with 10cm more.

    For having the 3 models, i must say i found that the Go was slightly better in terms of quality but it's more of a gut feeling. And not a big difference

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    As the top axis are the same in length as the UM2, belts are same etc. The slop is no differnt there and only thing is the height. The bed is on longer rods but linear bearings are the same so the slop is no different. I have both and to me the quality is the same.

    I would get the extended as there maybe that one job that you may need the extra height. You may think you don't need it till you start using it and might find it comes in handy.

    • Like 2
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    I had the UM2 and have the UM2 extended now.

    It's just the height. Same reliability and same quality.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Standard Ultimaker 2 vs Extended

    Thank you all very much for your comments; they answer my question perfectly.

    Cheers,

    Matt.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 3 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 27 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...