Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts


Recommended Posts

Hi, well you wanted to see some pics. I am not sure exactly what you wanted to see but here are some. If they generate questions then feel free to ask! This was printed some considerable time ago when I was very much a beginner. The first pic shows the difference! On the left is the original patio area and on the right is the same part that I printed a couple of days ago for comparison. I am sure if I reprinted the apartment block again I would achieve a much better overall quality.


The next two pics show the completed apartment block; along with a normal sized mouse to give a feeling of size/scale.



The final pic shows the pieces ready for final gluing; there are four parts, plus the roof and patio parts, not shown.


The base (A) was printed separately as part of the effort to avoid really long print times.

On the left (B) is the single story part of the building and as this is easy to glue to the rest of the model I printed it separately.

Then as you can see, the rest of the apartment block was printed as two parts – again to avoid a lengthy print time.

The front wall alone was originally printed as seven or eight separate parts and was probably the main area I was having problems with gluing it together satisfactorily.

Another point to mention is the roof line. I do not know what the architectural term is but you can see (I hope) that there is a stepped lip running all the way around. Originally I printed this as one piece, intending to stick it to the roof line on final assembly. But again this was a part that I found difficult to glue satisfactorily. If I remember rightly I was not sure, with the overhang, how it would print vertically, so printing it separately meant I could print it upside down. In the final print I printed it integrated with the walls, i.e. right way up with the overhang.

I should say that all the walls in the final version were printed vertically. When I originally printed them as a variety of pieces I had considered printing horizontally – it would have reduced the print time considerably. But I did not like the idea of the walls have diagonal lines (from the infill) rather than horizontal lines from the layers, so printing vertically was an early decision I made and which I stuck to.

If I were to print it again I think I would print parts C & D as one piece (in the region of 15-20 hours) to avoid the join lines; I would also probably either print it upside down to get a better roof line, or try printing the stepped roof line on its own again and glue it to the roof which should be a lot easier.




  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they were glued. The “glass” was made to the same dims. as the window frame and simply glued to the back of the frames. For the square windows, the white walls around the window apertures have a small recess built in on both sides and top & bottom, so the window frame was inserted from the interior side and glued to the recess; this stopped any gaps appearing between the window frame and the wall. I use Revell’s Contacta professional glue, chosen on the basis that Revell has been making plastic kits for decades! It needs the parts to be held in place for 5 minutes or so and seems to cure within a couple of hours or so.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 130 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!