Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

What does jumper JP3 (8/16 step) on Ultimaker 2 main board v2.1.4 do?

Recommended Posts


It sets the microstepping for the z-axis, open=8 (default), closed=16.

AFAIK all other axis are already on 16 microsteps.

If you close it with a jumper don't forget to double the steps/mm for the z-axis (from 200 to 400). The sound is a bit different afterwards, but besides that i noticed neither benefits nor drawbacks...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly what I needed to know.

In the link you provided above, it seems that changing to 16 steps may reduce some of the Z axis noise, so I will give it a try.

Some people in that post speak of resonance effects, and I believe my custom UM2 build may suffer from it as well, especially since it is even taller than the UM2 extended. My construction is build around an 20x20 aluminum extrusion frame and covered with 4mm composite alu panels. The Z max is 435mm now, and to stabilize the bed somewhat, I have attached flange bearings also below the bed. These bottom bearings also serve as support for the two bed support arms I have mounted as well below the bed. I hope the pictures of my (unfinished but yet functional build) will make this clear.




To compensate for the weight of the supporting arms, I even cut away the same mass from the build plate. The weight of the build platform has thus increased only by the weight of the extra bearings.





I hope that increasing the number of microsteps will alleviate some of the (resonance?) noise I am experiencing when the Z stage is moving down during homing, but possibly, the Z is just too high with respect to the various shaft diameters involved to avoid resonance. Maybe I need to find other ways to dampen those vibrations...

Thanks tinkergnome!

Edited by Guest

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Changed to 16 steps for the Z by installing the jumper on JP3, and the "resonant" noise when the Z shaft moves up and down (homing and to Z=0) have basically gone.

However, my Ulticontroller board has again failed, and again, it's the U3 chip that has blown with a very visible burnout hump on the chip.

I really start to believe this Ulticontroller design is flawed big time!

Edited by Guest

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 130 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!