Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted · Heat Capacity Limits Performance

Hi gr5,

I see your point. I wonder what it could be then? I only did the test once, I will have to test more when I get home later this week. I have updated the firmware so that's ok. One possibility is that I am running a hardened steel nozzle that I bought here:

hardened steel nozzle for abrasion resistance

The guy who sold it to me said that it would have worse heat transfer capability than the stock brass nozzles. So maybe the heater is heating up the hot end and the thermometer but not as much of the heat is going into the nozzle and the filament is pulling heat away from the nozzle internally? I should have mentioned this before but I only just thought of it.

I am running PETG filament.

Les

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Heat Capacity Limits Performance

    Brass is popular for 2 reasons:

    It's nice and soft so very easy to machine

    It has excellent heat transfer.

    Steel not so good on the heat transfer. So I wouldn't leave the nozzle at 240C when you are warming up or paused but once you starting printing I would definitely heat the nozzle up 10C hotter than what you use for brass. If doing that gives you a "heater error", only then would I recommend a more powerful heater. I have 35W, 40W, and 50W heaters for UM2 in my store.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Heat Capacity Limits Performance

    That must be what was happening then, I will switch back to the brass nozzle that was included with the printer. The steel one is just for abrasive filaments anyway. Well, that or run it hot and fast!

    Les

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Heat Capacity Limits Performance

    I had further trouble when I got back from a month in hospital so I swapped the steel nozzle for the stock brass one.  The problem disappeared!  Have a look at this photo:  

    5a33282d5569a_IvanGearBoxPrintError.thumb.JPG.d8934ce48dab1dc7357840d59b4f82d4.JPG

    The poor surface finish of the base is due to the steel nozzle's poor heat transfer coefficient.  The gears, however, are printed with the brass nozzle - nice fix!  

    Thanks everyone for this thought-provoking discussion!  

    Les

    5a33282d5569a_IvanGearBoxPrintError.thumb.JPG.d8934ce48dab1dc7357840d59b4f82d4.JPG

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.9 stable released!
        Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements.  Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
          • Like
        • 5 replies
      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Heart
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 4 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...