Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
the_mechanical

Cura is getting worse instead of better???

Recommended Posts

Hi,

since Cura 2.5 i realize quite some problems i never had to fight with before. So I'm feeling like Cura is getting worse. Maybe due to a lot of new functions (of which are some quite good for non-expert users like me).

Of course it's always a discussion what is "better" and what "worse" ;-)

All of the stuff below i didn't realize or had to fight with in the versions before 2.5/2.4.

Incomplete last layers, first i realized this on a print where i saw the last layer was not complete. Then i saw that this problem occurs more often:

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-24-51.thumb.png.684845ef8b06b1d4d1a08d81d545deb0.png

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-28-22.thumb.png.9440fb82aab782d96edf4c89bb355237.png

At earlier versions i never realized the thing, that when a Z-Offset is given for the support the first Layer is quite different. This leads to the problem, that the first Layer of the part is not adhesing on the build plate because then the distance is already 0.3mm instead of the given 0.1mm (at 0.2mm layer height). Not one print was succesfull with these settings. With 0 distance it was good, but the support was more difficult to remove.

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-32-09.thumb.png.076ee2823847951410534b50fc2e657b.png

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-32-32.thumb.png.a5ecb84cb1e41fbf43e9e7fccf19a669.png

And: https://ultimaker.com/en/community/49197-unwanted-useless-retractions-cura-25

I'm really thinking to give Cura to trash and use an other slicer instead. Since i've also a Dual-extrusion-modification on UMO+  it seems better to use Slic3r or maybe a commercial slicer. Dual extrusion is not usable with Cura at the moment if you don't have a UM3 (at least i couldn't figure out, even with a custom printer profile).

Let's see how 2.6 is doing, but it seems time to say good bye?

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-24-51.thumb.png.684845ef8b06b1d4d1a08d81d545deb0.png

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-28-22.thumb.png.9440fb82aab782d96edf4c89bb355237.png

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-32-09.thumb.png.076ee2823847951410534b50fc2e657b.png

Bildschirmfoto_2017-05-14_17-32-32.thumb.png.a5ecb84cb1e41fbf43e9e7fccf19a669.png

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!