Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
mcm001

Need to import 550MB STL file, but Cura won't load it

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I need to 3d print a model of Chile for a school project. I've got an STL from a site called terrain2stl, combined all the files in Netfabb, but now Cura won't load it. The file is about 550MB. Slic3r, Netfabb and 3d Builder all load it on my home (gaming) machine, but the school Macbook won't load it in Cura. Am I running into a size limit? How do I load it, short of generating G-code in Slic3r?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's too big. Aim for about 2million polygons or smaller (about 30mb to 100mb or smaller). There are some great, easy to use programs to decimate polygons. This one is pretty quick and pretty easy to use. ACtually it might be slow to load the initial 500mb file but then it's pretty good after that:

Meshlab:

http://www.shapeways.com/tutorials/polygon_reduction_with_meshlab

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might try two things. One is to install Cura on your home machine, and the other is to install Cura 2.6. There are a couple of things that I could not slice in Cura 2.5 forcing me to go to kisslicer, that I was able to slice in 2.6.

And, of course, the other possibility is to reduce polygons. Chances are that you won't see all that detain in a 3D print in any case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

And, of course, the other possibility is to reduce polygons.  Chances are that you won't see all that detain in a 3D print in any case.

Yes, I think this is a good idea: any details smaller than about 0.4mm in X- and Y-direction, will be hidden by the 0.4mm nozzle lines anyway (if you use a 0.4mm nozzle). And if you print in layers of 0.1mm, any vertical details smaller than 0.1mm will also be lost anyway. So you could as well reduce the details to these resolutions.

If you plan to sand and paint the model for a smoother surface, you could reduce everything to 0.5mm resolution, I guess. The rest will be sanded off anyway.

If you can cut the original model in small pieces, you could try this on a small part first, so you don't lose too much time and plastic if results are not satisfying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • How to 3D print with reinforced engineering materials
      Ultimaker is hosting a webinar where we explain how you can achieve and maintain a high print success rate using these new reinforced engineering materials. Learn from Ultimaker's Product Manager of Materials and top chemical engineer Bart van As how you can take your 3D printing to that next level.
      • 0 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!