Thank you for the quick answer!
With me it was a one wire disconnect ....before going into the amplifier circuit on the printhead. IF this was the cause. I can only speculate on that.
Is the current going into the heater monitored? That might be another way to sound the alarm if something is in the woods. The difficulty with these traps is setting them up in such a way that they dont trip on a false alarm and ruin a print....
I' m glad the Ultimaker would not go up in flames - if that was tested it somehow dampens my worries a bit. The smoke screen was quite impressive though. I can only imagine what it would be like once it starts to burn thru the perspex...
Probably the only real remedy for failures like that would be a second temperature sensor in the aluminum block with a separate circuit and wires going to the mainboard. But that might be too expensive and complicated.
Please keep up the good work, I really appreciate the efforts to make the ultimaker a better machine.
Recommended Posts
Daid 303
There are a lot of safety features in place. But they are not 100% fail safe right now. The biggest issue is when you disconnect the 3 wire connector. This sometimes gives an error, and it sometimes doesn't. On a reboot of the machine it always gives an error. (It's something I want to improve, as I have some ideas on how to catch this case better)
As for the "fire hazard", while it can cost you a PEEK part, a printer bed, and a lot of bad smell. The printer won't go up in flames. This was actually tested.
If you have a temperature sensor not in the heater block, the printer will try to heat up but stop with a "heating failed" error, as it doesn't see the printer warming up while it should. It also detects odd temperature readings and act on that. The main issue left, a 3 wire disconnect, keeps the temperature reading at about the same level as the disconnect. And thus makes it hard to detect the case.
Link to post
Share on other sites