Jump to content
Cura Connect | Survey Read more... ×
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
callep72

Defect prints with Cura 3.10, Octoprint and Ultimaker 2+ / Perfect from SD-card

Recommended Posts

Hello Ultimaker community!

When I print the Ultimaker Robot with Octoprint, the hands gets messy.

Well, not only the hands. The lower parts of the arms are just random strings.

The same robot from the SD-card prints excellent. Every time.

The photo shows the difference. These examples are printed in ABS.

UMrobots.thumb.JPG.a7fea0b4357701c16414eccd0d6aa8cc.JPG

I have made an effort in ensuring that they are printed with the same settings, from Cura.

I have repeated this ca 10 times and changed only one factor each time.

The results are consistent and I dare to say it´s not random.

I run latest Octoprint on an RPi2 connected to my network by ethernet cable and to UM2+ by USB.

* I´ve used Cura 3.10 from Win10 and Mac

* I´ve used the UM2+ firmware from Cura 3.04 and Tinker V17.10.1

* Gcode flavor is set to Marlin but RepRap is also tested

* I´ve printed in PLA, ABS and XT

The results have been identical.

The start and stop gcode in Cura are altered slightly to output more material before print and to lower the plate after print.

This works.

I would really like to get this working because everything looks super slick and works like a charm - except the results. My plan is to add the 7" touchscreen to Octoprint/OctoPi once this is working.

Grateful for any help to make this awesome!

Best regards

/Carl-Henrik

UMrobots.thumb.JPG.a7fea0b4357701c16414eccd0d6aa8cc.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

The robot is the same in both cases and is printed without support and brim from Cura.

In both cases it has the little support for the hand, which is part of the model I have.

What I understand, when you use Octoprint all print settings are transferred as gcode

but when the SD-card is used, some settings from the menu system is used such as temperature for nozzle and bed.

Maybe there is something to configure differently in Cura?

 

Do you (or anyone) know if Octoprint is used with success together with UM2+?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to back paddle...

When looking in the layer-view, as Labern suggested, I noticed that I actually was printing different robots. One with support for the hands and one without, exactly as DidierKleins educated guess. Thanks for getting me back on track! Also encouraging to hear that Octoprint works fine with UM2+.

Below is an ongoing print via Octoprint with complete arms and their small support.

 

image.thumb.png.be2cb9ffc88322c026d24c0757349a04.png

 

 

Case closed / Many thanks!

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a problem like this one but I really took the same model to print the part.  The only this I change is that I scale the model when I print it with my SD card because I was short on filament left on my spool.

 

On the left, it is the cura 3.1 slice model.  the GCODE send to octoprint.  With reprap GCODE...

 

On the right, it is the cura 3.1 slice model, transfert to SD card...with ULTIGCODE

 

Why with octoprint those print settings is bypass from the ultimaker 2+ firmware???

The filament temperature

The bed temperature

 

 

IMG_20180114_201146.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ultimaker 2 firmware does not allow you to use Ulti Gcode when printing over USB. Ulti Gcode is the flavor of gcode that does not set the material settings in the gcode but in the printer.

 

When you set the gcode flavor to Marlin, you get material settings in Cura (including temperatures), and you must use those instead of the settings on the printer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to take those settings in cura to make the print as perfect with if it's print with the SD card...

 

name=PLA
temperature=225
temperature_0.40=225
retraction_length_0.40=6.50
retraction_speed_0.40=25.00
temperature_0.25=225
retraction_length_0.25=6.50
retraction_speed_0.25=25.00
temperature_0.60=230
retraction_length_0.60=6.50
retraction_speed_0.60=25.00
temperature_0.80=240
retraction_length_0.80=6.50
retraction_speed_0.80=25.00
temperature_1.00=240
retraction_length_1.00=6.50
retraction_speed_1.00=25.00
bed_temperature=55
fan_speed=100
flow=100
diameter=2.85

 

But why on octiprint I can adjust the tool and the bed???

 

image.png.982e1c8368cd8417ad1b99fcad63b436.png

 

image.png.2f0601356bd54ff62d83d4e3871287d9.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Architect Design Contest | People
      The goal of this contest is to design a set of people figurines that could be used in such a project to make an area, office or mall seem populated. 
      Think of different types of people in different environments, like walking people, people standing still, working people, and both men and women.
       
      • 9 replies
    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!