Jump to content

F688ZZ bearing fit to shaft?


Recommended Posts

Posted · F688ZZ bearing fit to shaft?

I purchased F688ZZ bearings from robotdigg and 8 mm shafts from Misumi. The shafts are 7.998 mm in diameter and the F688ZZ bearings are less than 7.98 mm inside diameter. Those seem to be too tight of a press fit for the application.
What have other people's experiences been?

I'm looking at buying bearings from Misumi, but don't see ID tolerances anywhere to know if they're going to be a better fit or not.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · F688ZZ bearing fit to shaft?

    Are your sure the end of the shaft doesn't have a small burr preventing assembly?  That shaft OD does seem a bit on the high side for normal bearing use. Normally though, quality bearings are on-size, so even a slightly undersized shaft should go in.  8mm ID's are very difficult to measure, and if your bearings are from a reputable source, your interference may be smaller than you think.  If the bearings are only going on the ends, try polishing the shafts locally with sand paper.  It won't take much polishing, and best if spun by a machine.  You might get them to go together just by freezing the shafts, but will be difficult to re-position or disassemble later. 

     

    Never press the inner race onto an shaft by applying force to the outer race.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · F688ZZ bearing fit to shaft?

    Best that I can tell, it seems there are  a few different fits for this form factor of bearing. I'm guessing robotdigg has chosen a part with the wrong fit for this application.

    I checked the rods that I ordered and they're supposed to be a g6 fit, which means they're supposed to be 7.986-7.995 mm in diameter.

     

    I guess I could chuck the shafts in the lathe and polish them down just where the bearing will be fitted, like you suggest. I'd much rather find a better fit bearing and shaft combination, though. I don't think these should have much interference at all, just enough that there is no radial play in the shaft.

    Edited by burdickjp
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...