Thanks yellowshark and kmanstudios, your replies have been very helpful in confirming what i was thinking.
I appreciate you spending the time to reply
cheers
Jason
Thanks yellowshark and kmanstudios, your replies have been very helpful in confirming what i was thinking.
I appreciate you spending the time to reply
cheers
Jason
Cura programmers use Ultimakers which use 3mm filament. Maybe the estimation is wrong because you have 1.75mm filament? I mean cura is written to use ANY size filament - but maybe there is a bug with 1.75 and amount? the crazy thing is cura creates gcodes which tell the extruder EXACTLY how many meters to feed - I mean down to a hundredth of a millimeter. So you can get how many meters are going to be printed by looking at the gcode file and scrolling through it (although the E value goes back to zero occasionally as Marlin can't handle E values larger than a certain amount of meters (10? 100? 16784mm? 32768mm?).
When you said the amount was wrong was it the amount in grams? or the amount in meters? And you are talking about when you are still slicing - right? Not when printing?
Hi gr5,
its after slicing and when printing that the amount in meters is incorrect. As you have mentioned the slicer knows how much it will extrude and it should not matter what size the mineral is. If the 3mm theory is correct then i would be using 0.8m on a print right now which is running for 4 hours ? arguably i could multiply the meters by 2 (for example, 3mm/2 =1.50 rough guesstimate, ok i know its not that simple as its based on area and weight but its like 5% of the total filament needed). i'm going for it being a bug in Cura.
I seriously question the the knowledge of programmers being an old school engineer myself, its one of those love hate things between nerds and clankys, but being out in the range of 1/20th do Ultimaker users never use 1.75mm. still sticking to it being a bug.
did i mention i love the software though.
Sounds like his esteps steps-per-mm are way off, so the amount of plastic used is way off.
I found plastic estimates to be the most accurate of all. Time estimates were off by a large margin until I put all jerks and accelerations back to stock.. Now printer is accurate within a minute even on ten hour prints.. With only occasional layer shifts. :-P
My point is the estimates can be pretty good once software and firmware are on same page
Recommended Posts
yellowshark 153
I use Repetier Host to control my printing which has this facility. The first thing I do before every print is to extrude some filament until I am happy it is running smoothly and consistently.
Link to post
Share on other sites
kmanstudios 1,120
I have noticed that happens when it briefly looses contact with the main printer group master. Sometimes it can happen so fast that it does not register on Cura Connect. That has been my experience so far. Internal wifi can be dodgy about something like this. It is not noticeable on other ops like web browsing, but I have found it will periodically lose contact when in certain ops (When the printer is tie up or cannot talk to the software) or when there is a slight glitch in communications.
Link to post
Share on other sites