UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
now also note that the material used in the ";MATERIAL:" tag is in cubic mm and not in meters.
So that makes sense to me, the UM2 sees no material used in the metadata of that file.
What is worse, your gcode is not compatible with an UM2!
You set your gcode flavor to reprap in Cura and this results in gcode where the E steps are in mm of material use and not in the cubic mm of material used by the UM2(+). So this is not only a cosmetic change of the metadata.
Edited by robinmdh
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements. Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
robinmdh 100
If this is on a UM2(+) then please note that this is not the format used by ultigcode (this is the format used for the UM2).
example of ultigcode:
this is what your file has:
now also note that the material used in the ";MATERIAL:" tag is in cubic mm and not in meters.
So that makes sense to me, the UM2 sees no material used in the metadata of that file.
What is worse, your gcode is not compatible with an UM2!
You set your gcode flavor to reprap in Cura and this results in gcode where the E steps are in mm of material use and not in the cubic mm of material used by the UM2(+). So this is not only a cosmetic change of the metadata.
Edited by robinmdhLink to post
Share on other sites