Jump to content

Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable


SandervG

Recommended Posts

Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

The materials are once again sorted by color and not by materials. Could it be possible to sort them by materials again, or maybe give us a way to sort them ourselves?

materials.thumb.png.3993afb631cd1e26a896da36e3b7e0c0.png

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable
    9 minutes ago, Brulti said:

    Could it be possible to sort them by materials again

     

    Are you saying there's a Cura version where they were sorted by material?

     

    The sorting has annoyed me for a while, but sorting by material is actually not quite straightforward in the architecture that was set up. The current sorting is actually not by color, but by name. I agree that that window could still use some TLC, especially if it is expanded with many more materials.

    Edited by ahoeben
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    They were sorted by materials on the previous one, 3.2.1. I had all the PLA first with every color, then ABS I think, and so on.

    I'd rather have the sorting by name use the name of the materials rather than the color as it is now.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    I have tryed to use the Cura 3.3 with my UM3 and PLA. But the 2 or 3 prints did not stick to the bed fro some reason. I went bacck to the older one and perfect.

    Also I did not understand the Monitor.

    Thank you

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    I updated to Cura 3.3.1 .

    But I always run into software crashes.

    Everything works fine before I have loaded my old JSON file.

    Since I put in the old JSON file, the software could not be opened.

     

    The error message is as follows:

    Traceback (most recent call last):

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 969, in _find_and_load

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 958, in _find_and_load_unlocked

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 664, in _load_unlocked

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 634, in _load_backward_compatible

    File "__startup__.py", line 12, in <module>

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 969, in _find_and_load

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 958, in _find_and_load_unlocked

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 664, in _load_unlocked

    File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 634, in _load_backward_compatible

    File "Console.py", line 24, in <module>

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\bin\cura_app.py", line 141, in <module>

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\cura\CuraApplication.py", line 652, in run

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\cura\Machines\MaterialManager.py", line 107, in initialize

    KeyError: 'GUID'

     

     

     

    The log is as follows:

    Thread 0x0000266c (most recent call first):

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\Backend\Backend.py", line 155 in _storeStderrToLogThread

    File "threading.py", line 862 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x000018c4 (most recent call first):

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\Backend\Backend.py", line 147 in _storeOutputToLogThread

    File "threading.py", line 862 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x000019b0 (most recent call first):

    File "C:\Program Files\Ultimaker Cura 3.3\plugins\USBPrinting\USBPrinterOutputDeviceManager.py", line 66 in _updateThread

    File "threading.py", line 862 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x000021d0 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 293 in wait

    File "threading.py", line 424 in acquire

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 86 in _nextJob

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 116 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x000003c4 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 293 in wait

    File "threading.py", line 424 in acquire

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 86 in _nextJob

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 116 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00001f74 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 293 in wait

    File "threading.py", line 424 in acquire

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 86 in _nextJob

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 116 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00001490 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 293 in wait

    File "threading.py", line 424 in acquire

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 86 in _nextJob

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\UM\JobQueue.py", line 116 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00002214 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 297 in wait

    File "zeroconf.py", line 1569 in wait

    File "zeroconf.py", line 1153 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00002164 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 297 in wait

    File "zeroconf.py", line 1569 in wait

    File "zeroconf.py", line 1017 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00001308 (most recent call first):

    File "zeroconf.py", line 946 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00001408 (most recent call first):

    File "threading.py", line 297 in wait

    File "threading.py", line 549 in wait

    File "C:\Program Files\Ultimaker Cura 3.3\plugins\UM3NetworkPrinting\UM3OutputDevicePlugin.py", line 274 in _handleOnServiceChangedRequests

    File "threading.py", line 862 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Thread 0x00000810 (most recent call first):

    File "C:\Program Files\Ultimaker Cura 3.3\plugins\RemovableDriveOutputDevice\RemovableDrivePlugin.py", line 61 in _updateThread

    File "threading.py", line 862 in run

    File "threading.py", line 914 in _bootstrap_inner

    File "threading.py", line 882 in _bootstrap

     

    Current thread 0x00000ea0 (most recent call first):

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\cura\CrashHandler.py", line 364 in _logInfoWidget

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\cura\CrashHandler.py", line 214 in _createDialog

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\lib\python3.5\site-packages\cura\CrashHandler.py", line 82 in __init__

    File "X:\3.3\build\inst\bin\cura_app.py", line 101 in exceptHook

     

     

    Please help me solve this problem. Thanks very much!!!

    I need this old JSON file to use my 3dprinter.Thanks very much!!!

    Edited by cooljing
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    I had the same issue as TONYDG - could not get a SINGLE print sliced in newest version to adhere to bed on any of my printers, and in fact even downgrading version didn't fix. Each of my printers is different, and use their own machine profile and printing profile - I believe the upgrade screwed something up in there that I cannot find to fix, and I am a very experienced printer. Unbelievably frustrating issue

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Hi, is this normal?

    image.png.a795e1d0992e15ca8e9cc8abb6ddc8df.png

     

    Thanks

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    has anyone else lost camera feed from octoprint in the latest stable build 3.3? it was working well in 3.2.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    More people have reported it, but sofar I have not been able to reproduce it, let alone find a fix.

     

    In 3.3 the network printing was rewritten, and the camera handling is part of that. There are reports that some UM3 users have the same issue.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Build volume error.

    I can see it only AFTER i send job to printer. Why ?

    Why is the error not seen while slicing ?

    It is about raft for PC ultimaker.

     

    UM3 CURA 3.3.1

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Program crashes as soon as changelog is displayed.  Tried removing app, deleting the 3.3 folder in the Roaming directory and reinstalling 3.3.1 but it doesn't solve the problem.

    Running on Surface Pro 5 (Windows 10).  Version 3.2.1 runs fine.

     

    Any suggestions?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Since installing 3.3.1 I've noticed a significant increase in the Z scar width as compared to 3.2.1.  The model is printed with no infill (hollow) as I have always done.  It's an empty bottle.  The photos show the Z scar.  In 3.2.1 it was nice and straight, now in 3.3.1 t zig zags considerably, and really looks ugly on the outside of the model.    These screen shots of of the same model with the exact same settings.

     

    1387012924_Cura321ZScar.thumb.JPG.837d67701058e42ffd0435210ce0f54a.JPG199507471_Cura331ZScar.thumb.JPG.60a2282ee2b055de7886efa8135135b4.JPG

     

    Thoughts?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Mind to share the stl so others can try and see if it does the same on their computers?

    Edited by Brulti
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Attached STL file.  Printed with .8 nozzle, 2 walls, 0.2 layer, no infill, combing set to ALL, user defined Z at 250 X by 250 Y, model rotated 45° to put the Z scar along the long axis.

    16oz_Laundry_Oval.STL

     

    Have at it . . .

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    I have the same result with 'Z Seam Alignment' set to Shortest. It does the same even when choosing 'User Selected', there's still that wobble. Strange.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Make sure the Seam Corner Preference is set to None.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    I've tried all of the selections, None, Hide, Expose, Hide - Expose.  Same result.  I've even gone so far as to make sure the Start Layer X & Start Layer Y settings in the Travel - Combing match the Z location X & Y settings.  This problem only just started with 3.3.1.  3.2.1 does not do it.

     

    Not unique to this model.  Just a plain hollow Cylinder will do the same thing.  A tapered hollow Cylinder is slightly worse.  I wanted to transition over to 3.3.1 to take advantage of the Support Blocker, but this is kinda' a show stopper . . .☹️

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    There is a difference in some code in 3.3.1 to do with walls but I don't think it is causing the problem you are seeing and at the moment I can't reproduce your results. Could you please post a project file so that I can see all the settings as well as the model - thanks.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Here's a Project file of a much simpler shape.  Just a tapered Cylinder.  Same wobble in the Z seam.

     

    Thanks for your help . . .

     

    UM3E_300mL_Tapered_Cyl_Foamer.curaproject.3mf

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Hi @XYZDesignPro, i've looked at your file and, as far as I can tell, the problem is due to the resolution of the model being such that the z-seam position can vary with height. To explore this, I temporarily modded Cura so that the first segment in each line was replaced with a travel move so it's easy to spot where the z-seam starts and then I modified the flow of the lines alternating every line so that it would be possible to see the line segments the model has. Here's a picture...

     

    Screenshot_2018-05-01_15-49-29.thumb.png.bd9c2421b126250e55e835a99c1202c6.png

     

    So the extruder is traveling from left to right and the LHS of the blue travel lines are the position of the z-seam. Near the top, the z-seam position is quite consistent, lower down, less so. Now look at the length of those line segments, some are much longer than others and when a line segment is long enough it can span the desired z-seam location and the seam ends up further to the right as is happening in this close up:

     

    Screenshot_2018-05-01_15-55-12.png.766a14b4a035d538fb709fe1ba2c8b98.png

     

    So I think the model needs to have higher resolution. One other thing, when specifying the x/y position of the z-seam, I recommend setting the x-seam relative option which makes it easier to specify points that are near to a particular point on the model - with the added bonus that if you move the model, the z-seam position hint moves with it.

     

    Hope this helps, please get back to me if this doesn't solve your problem.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Thanks for the through analysis.  I'm using settings out of SolidWorks that are significantly finer than the default SW "Fine" settings, and have also gotten the same result when using the 3D Printing settings from the SW Plugin.  Attached is this same file sliced in 3.2.1.  As you can see the z seam is just about perfect.

     

    UM3E_300mL_Tapered_Cyl_Foamer.curaproject-2.3mf

     

    Also, I assume you meant z-seam relative not x-seam relative?  Oddly enough that setting says it's hidden, but when you check the box it shows up anyway. 

     

    1993244655_z-seamrelative.JPG.04575cca7ac074b96d58e9a4a9c97468.JPG

     

    That said the setting did not seem make any difference anyway.  BTW, in 3.3.1, I find that if I move the Z seam to a position of X - 116.5 and Y - 645, and uncheck the Z-relative the Z seam while not perfect, cleans up significantly.

     

    Please let me know what you think about the attached file from 3.2.1.  Since 3.2.1 is working perfectly, I guess I'll just forgo the Support Blocker for now.

     

    Again, thanks for looking into this . . .

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Well, I think there has been a change in Cura that simplifies models and it's being a bit over-zealous. There is an experimental setting called Max Resolution and this has an influence. The min value of that will be 0.001 mm I should think because Cura internally works in micro-metres. I exported the model from the .3mf and displayed it in freecad and it appears to have sufficient resolution.

     

    Screenshot_2018-05-01_18-01-15.thumb.png.2b2c321380bc51f2fb46bafc17e5d15a.png

     

    Sorry, I don't have an answer, I recommend that you open an issue over at https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura

     

    Edited by burtoogle
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    I don't have an account at Github to post to.  Perhaps someone on the forum with the Ultimaker team will see the conversation we have exchanged and jump in here. This is definitely a bug in this new release.  I think I still have 3.3 beta on my laptop.  I'm going to see if the same problem is in the beta.  I'll just continue to use 3.2.1 for now.

     

    Thanks for you help just the same . . .

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker Cura 3.3 | Stable

    Hi

    Since I've upgraded to 3.3.1 on my Mac, I no longer have access to network drives when saving a project.

    Is that normal ?

    Best

    David

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...