Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
QC102

Printer name - prefix on G Code

Recommended Posts

Since the 3.3.1 update, the option to add one's own  printer name  as a prefix to the produced G Code file... is now not possible for those who opt to configure as "Custom"  / FDM printers.   Is this a change in policy or a bug that will be fixed in a next update?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, QC102 said:

Since the 3.3.1 update, the option to add one's own  printer name  as a prefix to the produced G Code file... is now not possible for those who opt to configure as "Custom"  / FDM printers.   Is this a change in policy or a bug that will be fixed in a next update?

 

I discovered an interesting thing tonight. I loaded simple_vase.STL and the file name in the lower right corner was empty - I twigged that this was down to the upper case file extension and so renamed the file to simple_vase.stl and got the file name appearing as expected - is this just a Linux thing? Anyway, I shall post an issue on github.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ultiarjan said:

I have no idea why it's not taking your printer name anymore, but in the meantime you can ofc just click the name in the right bottom corner and rename the file...  but easy to forget indeed...

 

 

image.png.933040f7fba3390a694e216e7f91e2c4.png

 

image.png.dd43bf160331d3838182f03e9bb28f1b.png

 

 

Hi, Yes I do know  how to edit the file name. I am not alone to mention this "problem" - there have been a few comments on the Anet Geeetech support facebook group. One poster claims that his "name Prefix" us stuck at Prusa i3 - but I rather think he has the wrong setting!  Others have stated their "prefix" for custom.FDM printer ( all Anet A8's or A6 is as seen in your example...CFDMP.    Granted this is more ego than necessity.   I am guessing the software engineers test on the companies own machines.  However cheap and rubbishy as the Anet stuff is.. they do have a mega load of users and I feel it cannot be impossible to include an Anet Profile. After all  there is Tevo and Zonestar and maybe others I do not know about in the cheapo cloned range of printers...not as popular as the A8.    To conclude maybe the I.T.team can look at why this happens  as it obviously indicates something in the code has changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, smartavionics said:

 

I discovered an interesting thing tonight. I loaded simple_vase.STL and the file name in the lower right corner was empty - I twigged that this was down to the upper case file extension and so renamed the file to simple_vase.stl and got the file name appearing as expected - is this just a Linux thing? Anyway, I shall post an issue on github.

I tried to replicate that by renaming files with upper case file suffix - nothing happened!! I tried on win10 PC and iMac.  So  the guess is...is it a code deciepher issue  on  individual computers...or a Cura code glitch???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am  just curios on two point (3rd being ego!)  Is this change which occurred in 3.3.1  Intentional? If so...Why??   which is really for somebody with front office contacts or info.     As an aging  Adult - like many others with the cheapo clones printers.. I like to make it look better, and modify what can  be do to improve for visual aspect. electronically  safer and operating as best it can. Which for a cheapo Anet A8..is not over difficult for even my meager knowledge.  Its just a little quirk that we give the printer "a name" and if the IT team doing Cura wanted to remove that  option... WHY leave us paupers with CFDMP as a prefix.. what on earth is thw sense in that??  As a sulk I have turned off the info share options - so I don't confuse those who check it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Vijit said:

Found it in Cura 3.6.0 (Linux)
General > Opening and saving files: checkbox "Add machine prefix to job name"

In 3.6.0  I  get this - CFFFP_60mm FanStand-Snap- A8-4.

A8-4 being the printer name -   BUT do we really need to know the actual printer type  CFFFP_  which is not removable - of no interest to me or anybody else and is a stigma  because I use an Anet A8.  

Why not leave it as was -  A8-1_60mm FanStand-Snap  ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 114 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!