UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Could you rotate the model 90°, so it is laying flat? And then print with 90% or 100% infill? That should give a quite stong part.
For casting epoxy into a print, I would rather use no infill at all. Otherwise the infill grid might create weak points where bonding to the epoxy is not very strong, and where air bubbles are entrapped. Another thing to consider might be shrinking of the epoxy, which could deform the model, so try to find a slow-curing, low-shrink and low-exotherm version.
But if you plan to use epoxy anyway, what about designing and printing a mould, and then casting the epoxy into it? At least, if the shape of the model allows this (=not too complex, no impossible undercuts)? Then you would have a part in one piece, in one single material. And the mould might be reusable. Also, it might be easier to incorporate fibers or steel wire into it. Only make sure you get *very good* release methods, in multiple layers, so the epoxy does not stick to the mould.
Or else, what about printing a single piece of the model, then post-process it and make it nice and smooth, and then cast a silicone mould around it? And then cast the epoxy in the silicone mould? This gives less release problems, due to the non-stickyness and flexibility of the silicone. But still use plenty of release spray, to ease releasing and to prolong mould life. There are lots of good Youtube videos on mould making and casting. Probably this is the method I would try, if I had to do it. This method combines the advantages of 3D-printing with those of silicone moulds and casting.
If you have succes, or failure, don't hesitate to show the results here, so that we can learn from it.
Your reflections on alternatives make sense. My thinking in this case was to have the part come off the printer in a state where, after curing, it would be good to go with minimal post processing. Your points on the weaknesses introduced by the infill echo a similar engineering concern on shear lines.
I did consider alternative placement, there are some constraints on doing that, such as printing a sloping surface without a big alias effect and a full length bore for a rod.
That said, I am looking into mold options, there are a few threads here on filament choices, around here it looks like I am down to moldlay or printable wax. May have to do a bit of trial and error there.
Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements. Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
geert_2 560
Could you rotate the model 90°, so it is laying flat? And then print with 90% or 100% infill? That should give a quite stong part.
For casting epoxy into a print, I would rather use no infill at all. Otherwise the infill grid might create weak points where bonding to the epoxy is not very strong, and where air bubbles are entrapped. Another thing to consider might be shrinking of the epoxy, which could deform the model, so try to find a slow-curing, low-shrink and low-exotherm version.
But if you plan to use epoxy anyway, what about designing and printing a mould, and then casting the epoxy into it? At least, if the shape of the model allows this (=not too complex, no impossible undercuts)? Then you would have a part in one piece, in one single material. And the mould might be reusable. Also, it might be easier to incorporate fibers or steel wire into it. Only make sure you get *very good* release methods, in multiple layers, so the epoxy does not stick to the mould.
Or else, what about printing a single piece of the model, then post-process it and make it nice and smooth, and then cast a silicone mould around it? And then cast the epoxy in the silicone mould? This gives less release problems, due to the non-stickyness and flexibility of the silicone. But still use plenty of release spray, to ease releasing and to prolong mould life. There are lots of good Youtube videos on mould making and casting. Probably this is the method I would try, if I had to do it. This method combines the advantages of 3D-printing with those of silicone moulds and casting.
If you have succes, or failure, don't hesitate to show the results here, so that we can learn from it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
JohnInOttawa 104
Good feedback @geert_2, thank you!
Your reflections on alternatives make sense. My thinking in this case was to have the part come off the printer in a state where, after curing, it would be good to go with minimal post processing. Your points on the weaknesses introduced by the infill echo a similar engineering concern on shear lines.
I did consider alternative placement, there are some constraints on doing that, such as printing a sloping surface without a big alias effect and a full length bore for a rod.
That said, I am looking into mold options, there are a few threads here on filament choices, around here it looks like I am down to moldlay or printable wax. May have to do a bit of trial and error there.
Thanks again, appreciate your help!
John
Link to post
Share on other sites