Jump to content

Top surface didn't fully closed


lan

Recommended Posts

Posted · Top surface didn't fully closed

What temp and speed are you printing at?

What program are you slicing it with? I recommend using the latest Cura. I get pretty good results printing hollow models like these, even with zero infill, although I haven't tried this one (yet).

That said, the top of objects like this is always going to be tough, because there's a very gentle slope, so you can easily end up printing over the top of nothing. You need to make sure that there is good overlap between the layers. Going to a thinner layer height might help (I like 0.06 for these sorts of things) ... or adding a third loop (going to 1.2mm shell thickness).

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Top surface didn't fully closed

    Make sure the fan is on and make sure it is taking at least 5 seconds per layer. If you don't do both of those then you will get exactly what you see here (although I think illuminarti is right and it's printing over air). For example the "minimal layer time" should be at 7 seconds and more importantly, "minimum speed" should be 0 (under expert/cool).

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Top surface didn't fully closed

    As a reference, I finally tried printing this, and I'm really delighted with the results. It's a fairly easy model to print, as there are no steep overhangs - the print didn't need any external clean up.

    Squinty Head Scan

     

    I printed it 10cm high, with zero infill, 0.06mm layers, 1mm top thickness, and 1.3mm skin (2 passes of my 0.65mm nozzle) at about 135mm/s (I set it to 150mm/s, with a 7mm min layer time - which slowed it down to about 76mm/s. I then gradually cranked the speed up to 175% in the Ulticontroller - so the overall requested speed was about 135mm/s). I forgot to check the total print time, but it was about 3.5hrs, I think.

     

    The fan was on for the whole print, and the top closed up absolutely fine for me. As George mentioned, I think the critical thing is to make sure that the minimum layer time is long enough. 4 seconds proved to be more than long enough for me here, with 0.06mm layers, but will need to be increased for thicker layers I imagine.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.8 beta released
        Another Cura release has arrived and in this 5.8 beta release, the focus is on improving Z seams, as well as completing support for the full Method series of printers by introducing a profile for the UltiMaker Method.
          • Like
        • 1 reply
      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 3 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...