Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Printing Holes


jameshs

Recommended Posts

Posted · Printing Holes

Not sure if this is how to do pictures!

 

2013 07 19 15.56.23gcode viewerthread hollowthread 2printed wall thicknesswall thicknesstest threadsnetfabb Fix

I am trying to print two small 'holes' voids in the side of an object - it is to take a clip in the side wall of a small box. one side prints brilliantly - because the head stops and dos not cross - imagine a C where the good opening is on the opening of the C and the bad opening is opposite - because of the stringing it does try to leave this one out, but stringing and a slight amount of oozing means that this opening actually gets filled.

Is there a trick I am missing ?

Slicing in Cura

The wall thickness is only 0.5

Nozzle 0.4

Stock Setup (have had machine 2 weeks :)

While PLA

220 degrees

Print Speed 75

Layer height 0.1

Retraction speed 60, distance 4.5

Speed 100

min layer time 8 seconds

I played around with a lower temp setting - 210/215/220 and below 220 I had artifacts (curling) from not getting proper adhesion on the first layer - whereas I get good adhesion (painters tape) at 220

I lowered feed by increasing the diameter of the filament (it is 2.87 ave and I have put in 2.84 for normal extrusion - when I increased the diameter I did not have enough extrusion to actually achieve good layer adhesions and the thing fell apart.

Am I trying something too hard - I was thinking that maybe I should do a dimple in stead of a hole as then I am just diverting the head?

It can clearly achieve the bridging as it does one side perfectly - but not the other.

I am just really trying to learn all the defaults on a simple box before I move to more complicated stuff - 40 boxes printed so far - drawn in Revit, into 123D Design, out to STL and into Cura!

love the machine!

Should I keep trying to go with the hole/bridging - or go with a dimple?

James

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    Ok, I see the picture now, although its a bit fuzzy. :-)

    It looks like it's not even trying to print a hole there. If you look in the layers view in Cura, do you se it really trying to print in that area? I suspect there's something wrong with your STL file and how the hole is defined, such that Cura doesn't see it as a hole. Can you share the STL file?

    Are any of the 'fix horrible' advanced settings turned on in Cura? Those might be deliberately trying to close the hole up.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    I played around with a lower temp setting - 210/215/220 and below 220 I had artifacts (curling) from not getting proper adhesion on the first layer - whereas I get good adhesion (painters tape) at 220

     

    1) Wiping the blue tape with isopropyl alcohol (found anyplace that sells bandages) will DRASTICALLY increase the adhesion to the tape. Try it.

    2) There's nothing wrong with printing the first layer at a higher temperature and then lowering the temperature manually either with Cura or with an ulticontroller. It's pretty straight forward and simple.

     

    It looks like it's not even trying to print a hole there.

     

    This is *not* a difficult print. You will learn about difficult prints later, lol. I agree with illuminati here - are you sure it's not *trying* to fill that hole? Look at the gcode view - blue lines are non-extruding passes. You might need to visit the 'fix horrible' checkboxes.

    You could reduce stringing by reducing the pressure of the filament in the print head which is easiest to do by lowering the print speed. Both Cura and Ulticontroller let you set the % print speed - when it gets close to the top lower it to say 30%. When you are printing at high speed you get high pressure at the nozzle and it's hard to stop the PLA from oozing out.

    Also you will get less stringing at lower temperatures as the PLA is more like toothpaste and less like honey:

    http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/1872-some-calibration-photographs/

    Your filament and UM will vary so do the test I did in the top photo to determine how much stringing you get at various temperatures. Its an easy test and only takes about 10 minutes.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    so this will sound dumb - how do I upload gcode - the album viewer would not let me?

    I had a look at it in the Gcode viewer gcode.ws and the hole is definitely there.

    Will post a screenshot next post.

    James

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    here is a picture of the gcode

    the issue is that the blue blobs produce pla blobs, and that the thin green line produces strings, which form a thin, but effective wall.

    so it is seeing it - and I rotated the model - and it did the same thing to the rotated side, and printed the other side well - so it depends on how it slices it.

    I can try the adhesion tricks - so are we saying that I need to have the lowest temp possible for void/bridging and (in my mind) a higher temp for good lower layer adhesion?

    Can I have a lower layer temp like I can have a lower layer thickness? ... or does that require a manual editing of the gcode?

    gcode viewer

    Thanks

    James

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    You could have just looked at the gcode in cura. Be default cura shows the model as a 3d object you can pan, zoom, rotate around (right click drag, both click drag, shift right click drag).

    In the top right corner is an icon to view in other modes which can be very helpful. One of them is "layers" which shows the gcode visually in 3D. You can select the layer you care about with the slider and zoom in and around the problem or questionable area with the 3D mouse movement.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    So I agree it is stringing. Possibly extreme stringing. Pretty easy to get rid of - read my post above.

    I'm wondering about that retraction speed of 60 though. I don't think it's possible for the retraction motor to move that fast. Maybe try 20? Marlin changed the code that controls the extruder stepper and there was a bug and I have a version from last December (with the bug) and I assume you have a version with the bug fixed (actually maybe not - not sure if Daid has updated Marlin in Cura since December) so I can't really speak intelligently about the speed other than 60 seems too high. The bug made higher speeds slower so 40 might give you 20 and 60 might give you 10 or something bizarre like that - I really don't know the details. But a slow retraction speed would give the filament time to blob. I really recommend you do a test just like that stringing test print in my post above.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    More details about extrusion speed bug:

    http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/1734-marlin-bug-the-myth-of-retraction-speed/

    I use speed of 40mm/sec and have this bug so it's actually 20mm/sec I guess.

    Note that this speed doesn't affect normal printing which is much slower, but mostly affects retraction.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Printing Holes

    There are a couple of things you could try to get this to work better. Firstly, lower your retraction speed. 60 is too high, and kinda meaningless given some bugs in the Marlin firmware. Better try a speed of around 40 if you're using the standard firmware, and 30 or so if you have built your own fixed firmware (see: my discussion of the problem here).

    Secondly, increase your travel speed to at least 150mm/s. That will help break the bead of filament when moving, rather than dragging it across the gap.

    Some people do adjust layer temps for first layers vs bridging etc. Some slicers allow you to set a different first layer temperature, but Cura currently doesn't. However, I've never felt the need to do that. Make sure your z=0 position has the head just touching the bed, use the widest blue tape that you can find, and wipe it with isopropyl alcohol before you start the print, and the bottom will stick just fine at most any temperature.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
        • 21 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
         
         
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
         
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
         
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
         

         
        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
         
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...