Jump to content
Cura Connect | Survey Read more... ×
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
JCD

More and more settings >>> a suggestion for the Team

Recommended Posts

As the number of settings is like the number on the thermometer in the sahara desert in the morning, it's more and more difficult to find the relevant parameters if you want to modify them to improve your prints.

 

My suggestion for the Cura Team is to use the information which is appearing in the blue window when the mouse is staying for a while over a setting.

There are 3 types of information in the blue window :

- an explanation of the setting

- Which other setting is affected if you change this setting (Affects)

- Which setting are affecting this setting if they are changed (Affected by)

 

It would be very interesting if the Team create an "enhanced search" besides the original one already in place

 

Put Three check box for each kind of the above kind of information, beside the search text box

 

If the checkboxes are set, Cura in the search would  make visible also :

-The settings for which the search word is in the 'explanation'

-The settings that are in the 'Affects' list of the settings found by the 'simple' search

-The settings that are in the 'Affected by' list of the settings found by the 'simple' search

 

Thus the 'simple' search that Cura has would become a "smart seach" very useful !!

Edited by JCD
modify the text

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how related this is, but I have a similar problem - I have a couple very different machines, and settings get confused between them.

 

I have a bowden style, multi-extruder machine, and a stock Prusa Mk3 (short path/direct drive).

 

The filament which works wonderfully at <0.6mm retract on the prusa needs 1.5-2.5 mm retract on the Creality.

 

The issue is the carefully tuned settings are following the filament instead of the printer. I believe (though folks with more than 3 printers likely know this better than I) that the bowden set up likes an additional ~1-2 mm of retract - but the settings are following the filament not the printer - and causing failures and low quality prints.

 

I'm not quite sure how this is useful, but I feel it is a discussion that could be fruitful if it gets some thought. So far the only solid solution is using a different competitor's software for each printer, just to keep settings from contaminating. Anything to prevent that would be VERY appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have so many darned profiles I can't remember what they all do - they never make the changes I want.

 

I certainly have two main ones ("CR10 Dual Ext PVA Support" and "Mk3 PLA 215C") and am very conscious of them. But changing materials AFTER choosing the profile will overwrite the retraction settings with the material's definition. The setting you get (non-explicitly) depends on the order that you chose  your settings in. I would like it so that if I specify both the printer and the filament that the print will predictably use the same settings.

 

The real issue is that retraction is set at the filament level, but while you could argue there's an *additional* retraction needed for some materials, there's a baseline retraction associated with the printer (you might want to turn it off in some cases).

 

My Mk3 needs ~0.6mm of retraction for all materials where I use retraction.

CERTAIN materials can use a little more.

 

I would suggest the printer profile has some baseline retraction, and the materials only have a delta from that.

 

In the meantime, I've just made two of everything: CR10_Inland / CR10_Black and copy that to Mk3_Inland / Mk3_Black so I can recognize from the color name that it matches the printer, and I change the brand so I can easily pick them off the list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/15/2018 at 11:10 AM, JCD said:

As the number of settings is like the number on the thermometer in the sahara desert in the morning, it's more and more difficult to find the relevant parameters if you want to modify them to improve your prints.

 

Sort of along his lines, the "linked materials" tells you it shares "SOME" properties, but since you don't know what they are, you are constantly getting bit in the behind by it. I suggest the pop-up is a LOT more explicit, or the settings themselves get little chain-symbols as the main print settings do, to tell you when you're altering other materials without realizing it.

 

I couldn't GET my printer to work with PVA until I just took a PLA and changed the settings so that CURA would stop refusing it outright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Architect Design Contest | People
      The goal of this contest is to design a set of people figurines that could be used in such a project to make an area, office or mall seem populated. 
      Think of different types of people in different environments, like walking people, people standing still, working people, and both men and women.
       
      • 9 replies
    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!