Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Smithy

Bondtech for UM3

Recommended Posts

If I would plan to upgrade the feeders of my UM3, which one should I use?

There are 2 Bondtech upgrade kits for the UM3 available, the DDG and the QR kit with the stepper motors. 

 

Which kit makes more sense? Are the stepper motors much different than the stick UM motors? Does it make sense to change it?

Or is the DDG enough to "upgrade" the UM3.

 

I also have to say, I have currently no problems with the UM3 feeders, but just looking what could make sense to upgrade.

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW I just took delivery of my DDG kit last evening.  I will provide feedback as soon as I have it up and running.

 

My decision was based on my intended use and constraints on the printer.  I've had no issues with my existing feeders but would like to print abrasives and also thought the bondtec gripping might do better with difficult filaments like TPU and PETG.  That's not yet proven.

 

I looked at the QR kit but in my case, it was more invasive than I needed to achieve my improvements.

 

Now, if anyone knows a good way to recycle UM3 feeders on a UMO ?

 

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and yes please give us some feedback after you have upgraded.

 

I think I should contact Bondtech directly, what they say about the difference between the two kits. I searched the web and forums a lot, haven't found users which have the DDG and the QR, but was not able to find a descriptive difference. Also the Bondtech website don't tell much about the difference.

 

But maybe someone else have more infos about it.....

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, JohnInOttawa said:

Now, if anyone knows a good way to recycle UM3 feeders on a UMO ?

Whats the question? , just print a bracket and mount the feeder? And if you're upgrading anyway why not also put in a UM2 head....

 

and QR vs DDG, it seems to me the QR is easier to clean vs the DDG as it's a more open design. I happily use a QR on an UM2 for a long time.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 92 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!