Jump to content

Ultimaker or something else..?


rvh

Recommended Posts

Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?

We are in the market for a 3d printer. Currently our preference goes to an Ultimaker, Orca V0.40 or a Rapman 3.2

Ultimaker and Orca are both developed by Dutch companies which is a plus for us because we are based in Eindhoven (NL). Orca has a heated bed, that's a plus to.

Ultimaker seems to be a little more plug and play than the other two. I don't mind building the printer (actually, that's part of the fun I guess), but once build, I'd like to start printing right away.

Wile reading in this forum and other places on the internet I got confused a little by all the info going around. So I need some help to pick the right printer.

I do have experience with a ZCorp Z450 so I'm not entirly new to 3d printing, but the filament extruder printers are a little diferent. I don't expect to get the same quality or resolution as on the Z450, but we would like to be able to make or own proto's in house in stead of having them SLS-ed (or something like that) at an external company.

Is there anyone in Eindhoven or surroundings, who owns one or more of the pinters as described and who is willing to print us some parts (willing to pay for this) so we can compare a little better? If possible I'd like to come see the printers in real life.

Other advice regarding the choice is also very welcome!

Cheers.

Roel

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?

    Hello fellow dutchguy!

    The Orca is a RepRap machine as far as I can see? Unless you don't mean this one:

    http://reprap.org/wiki/Orca

    What I've seen from RapRap machines is that they look unstable, and take a look of time to tweak for usable results.

    The RepMan looks like a crossover between an early RepRap (Darwin) and an Ultimaker.

    From personal experience, from unboxing to first print took me 8 hours with the Ultimaker. Community support is good. But currently has some lead time issues (hopefully solved soon)

    The Ultimaker should get a heated bed upgrade option, we've seen the prototypes in the Ultimaker HQ.

    As for finding someone with an Ultimaker, mine is in Amersfoort. But check the fab-labs. There might be a fab-lab near in in Eindhoven that has an Ultimaker.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?
    The Ultimaker should get a heated bed upgrade option, we've seen the prototypes in the Ultimaker HQ. There might be a fab-lab near in in Eindhoven that has an Ultimaker.

    The heated bed option is being prototyped, but the problem was the heating itself and the time it took to get the correct heat. You wont need with with PLA.

    Currently I got prints with 0.025mm layers using experimental software, but I think that if you use netfabb you can even get lower than that...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?
    Currently I got prints with 0.025mm layers using experimental software, but I think that if you use netfabb you can even get lower than that...

    Layer height really doesn't depend on the software.. Skeinforge is just as capable (possibly more so) at producing gcode for very thin layers - it just takes longer to do it.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?

    The Orca V0.40 I refered to is the one from http://mendel-parts.com/ (temporarily website down).

    Looks a lot more stable than most Mendel based printers.

    If Ultimaker is offering heated print beds in the (near) future, that would make the choice even harder ;)

    We found a company that is willing to print us a testprint on the Rapman 3.2, now we would still like a sample from an Ultimaker and an Orca so we can make a choice.

    Anyone who can print a sample for us (if in Eindhoven area, we would like to see the printer in action in real life if possible)?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?

    Well, I went trough all the available kits and ever came back to ultimaker.

    For me, it was the pictures of the quality the machine produces and that the moving head is kept as light as possible.

    I didn't regret buying the kit yet. But one got to know, that there is a lot to learn and that you can't do everything with that kind of machine. At least not without serious postprocessing when support is needed.

    As for heated bed, I will definitely try to make one, as I indeed see a lot of warping, when printing longer filled parts. At least with the supplied PLA. I want to switch to ABS soon and what I read so far, it will become worse with that.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Ultimaker or something else..?
    I do have experience with a ZCorp Z450 so I'm not entirly new to 3d printing, but the filament extruder printers are a little diferent. I don't expect to get the same quality or resolution as on the Z450, but we would like to be able to make or own proto's in house in stead of having them SLS-ed (or something like that) at an external company.

     

    If is about printing prototypes then you really need something which generate removeable/soluable support for parts - I was not able to print any of our prototypes with Ultimaker and RepRap only UP! was able to do so, RepRap and Ultimaker printers are good for statues and very solid objects but for example if is about prototype for TV remote controller then too many "flying" sections which are impossible to print without support. But if your prototypes are very solid or self supported models then is no problem.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...