Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken


Recommended Posts

Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

I went into "Open File", selected two small STLs (bottom and top of a Raspberry Pi case) expecting both to appear on the buildplate

 

One was not on the build plate

 

Right click and Arrange All Models and it still won't place them on the bed

 

I tried again, making sure (Ctrl A) all models selected and "Arrange All Models"  Same problem and error

 

I wound up manually placing them on the bed, but wanted you to be aware of the behavior.

 

image.thumb.png.0436db5589034b91d2683eb2662e749b.png

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    The arranger is a bit naive. It places the largest object in the middle and tries to fit all other models around it. This is a decent strategy if there are objects with multiple sizes, but as you can see, it fails if both objects are a bit larger than 30% of the buildplate in either direction.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken
    15 hours ago, nallath said:

    The arranger is a bit naive. It places the largest object in the middle and tries to fit all other models around it. This is a decent strategy if there are objects with multiple sizes, but as you can see, it fails if both objects are a bit larger than 30% of the buildplate in either direction.

     

    Is it planned to make it less naive?

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    So we're awaiting an intern to fix this rather obvious issue?

    Gotcha.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted (edited) · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    Even though an issue seems obvious, it doesn't mean that the solution is easy by any means. Properly fixing this is months of work (because then you'd also take rotation into account). If you want to get it really right, it's easily 6-9 months of work research-wise (hence, me wanting to get a master thesis student for it).


    There is a reason we didn't fix it in the first place (which I thought was rather obvious from me stating that it's naive instead of confirming that it's indeed a bug as originally claimed)

     

    Edited by nallath
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    Well I don't think the average end user needs to know all about the intern stuff or what's involved in fixing it.

     

    I was just pointing out that it's not working and would prefer you treat a customer as one.  I bought a printer and countless filaments, upgrade components and so on.  Your response, intentional or not, comes off as rude.

     

    (I think you guys are really loosing touch with your customers.  There used to be some respect and simple acknowledgement of an issue.  Now you offer a bunch of internal excuses why something won't be resolved.)

     

    I guess I'd prefer you just acknowledge the issue and tell us a fix is coming in a future release.

     

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    I don't really see how my first response is in any way rude. It provides a reason why in this case the solution fails. It doesn't ignore your claim, nor does it write it off as invalid.

     

    I do see how my third response can be seen as rude. I intended it to be a bit snarky, since your response to an honest attempt to explain why it was doing it was "Oh, so you don't even fix simple things anymore". I hope you can understand that that comment in and on itself is rude (and a bit shortsighted). Was that the best way to respond for me? Probably not. But I don't feel that my response was that out of line.

     

    I'm not customer support and I don't care to be one. I will answer technical questions as I would like to be treated when I am a customer. This means that I won't sugar-coat it, I won't give vague promises as "I'm sorry that this happened, we will look at it as soon as possible". Instead, I explain what is going on, why it is like that and (in this case) why it hasn't been solved. I don't feel that this is something that has changed. It's the exact same kind of response that I've given countless times in the past.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    You, like it or not, are one of many public faces of Ultimaker and whether you consider yourself Customer Support or not, you represent the company.  Thus, when you make "snarky" responses, it reflects on your team and company.

     

    When you ask the community for feedback on beta versions and respond in this way, then defend it...it's disappointing.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    So when I reply in a snarky way to a snarky comment it's disappointing? Could you explain to me why this is disappointing? I'm really not understanding the issue here, to be honest.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · 3.6 Beta - Arrange Models broken

    I'm going to leave this thread alone and Agree to Disagree with you, on this topic.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • Startups, apply for the Forward AM Innovation Award!
        Are you a startup using 3D printing? Perhaps you should continue reading... 
         
        Together with BASF we are launching the Forward AM Innovation Award - the very first global contest for startups developing new applications with 3D printing!
         
        Why apply?
        The winning startup will receive €100,000 in goods and services*, along with coaching and marketing exposure from top-notch leaders in the industry.
         

         
        Who can apply?
        Your startup creates products using Additive Manufacturing, is less than 5 years old, and has less than 50 employees. We are looking for 3D printing applications with a strong focus on innovation, sustainability and scalability.
         
        Dental aligners, shoes, tools, automotive parts, music instruments, industrial tooling and molding, medical implants, sports equipment, toys, architecture, fashion, construction... all are welcome to join!
         
        Do you have an innovative, sustainable and scalable idea that leverages the unique possibilities of 3D printing? Then it is time to apply!
        More information can be found here.
         
        Applications close on March 28th, 2021
        * What does "in goods and services" mean?
        The winner will be able to pick any item from the overall product and service portfolio of the sponsors, e.g. printers, materials, consulting, software... Choose whatever you need to accelerate your startup.
         
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • New here? Register your Ultimaker for free 3D printer onboarding course
        Hi,
         
        Often getting started is the most difficult part of any process. A good start sets you up for success and saves you time and energy that could be spent elsewhere. That is why we have a onboarding course ready for
        Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle, Ultimaker S5, Ultimaker S3 Ultimaker 2+ Connect.   
        They're ready for you on the Ultimaker Academy platform. All you need to do to gain access is to register your product to gain free access. 
        Ready? Register your product here in just 60 seconds.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...