Jump to content

Quick question...bed to nozzle...


LePaul

Recommended Posts

Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

I'm still tweaking to get that first layer to look "smooshed" as you guys have kindly advised.

On each edge, as I calibrate and adjust the four screws on the bed, I'm using a piece of paper to guide me. If I can't pull it back and forth, I loosen it slightly.

But I'm not quite at that "smooshed" quality of first layer.

I know this calibration can take time to nail down, I am curious what worked well for you?

Again...I know I ask a lot of questions...but I appreciate your feedback. :geek:

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Yes, piece of paper is the way I do it. At each corner, tighten the screw until the paper slides freely under the nozzle, then unscrew it slowly, until you just begin to feel the nozzle catch on the paper as you move the paper around. Repeat that in all four corners, and then loosen all four screws another 1/8 turn, to compensate for the thickness of the paper.

    Don't overthink it... sometimes you'll get better first layers than others... so long as the layer goes down and stays stuck, you'll be fine.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Ah! See that's what I missed...

    Repeat that in all four corners, and then loosen all four screws another 1/8 turn, to compensate for the thickness of the paper.

    That should make a big difference! Thank you!

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    This is a good question as it still frustrates me - even yesterday. It wasn't priming the nozzle as much as normal and it took me 3 tries to get a print started but at first I thought it was levelling. Or maybe it *was* levelling. I'll never know as I messed with both things.

    Anyway, to answer you... it all depends - if your first layer is .3mm thick it shouldn't be smooshed much because your bead is .3mm high and .4mm wide and that is almost square (.4 by .4) but squished by 25%. But if your first layer in Cura is .2 or .1mm then it *should* be smooshed. So I guess I should ask - what is your first layer in Cura? I'm going to guess you use the "quickprint" settings. It's time to use the "full settings" mode.

    If your print is sticking very well to the tape and when you are done printing you are having a hell of a time getting it off without ripping the blue tape then you are fine.

    If your print popped right off then you need to squish it in a little more (either that or it's because you didn't remove the waxy surface from the tape using isopropyl (aka rubbing) alcohol).

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    I agree, like most of the settings you chose for your Ultimaker, rarely one of them stands alone.

    Most of the values are effected by another setting. Like speed-print temperature, etc.

    Just as the calibration of your Nozzle-bed level.

    It depends on what your first layer is.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    I no longer adjust my bed using the paper method. I have found it to be unnecessarily tedious and the process too distanced from the result it is trying to achieve. It is much easier to simply send a job which has a large and long skirt and adjust the screws while the skirt prints, until you have a uniform, well-adhered first layer.

    This process eliminates all of the guesswork and conflated variables associated with the paper method, because you directly influence the end result in real time.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    I have found that it is easier to find the proper distance between hot nozzle and bed by using this device instead of using the leveling screws: http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:62819

    Granted this only works assuming you have already leveled your bed. I just use a flashlight and use the jog function in Cura to move the nozzle to various points and then initiate the z axis home function. From there I just determine the correct distance by eye. If I need to make any adjustments, I simply turn the one screw at the top of the aforementioned device the required distance and repeat the process. Only takes me a minute or two after changing the tape on the bed.

    I also agree with gr5 on the fact that there is not one "sweet spot" for all prints. You should change you distance depending on your first and perhaps succeeding layers.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    A lot of very diverse replies...very interesting!

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    I've been doing as Nick suggests for a long time. It just takes a bit of a trained eye to notice what the proper line width should be as it's printing, but it is easy enough to pick up. Basically, unless my first layer is really having trouble sticking, I am just checking to make sure the fill looks like this - - - - - , not -^-^-^-^- (bed being too close and pushing excess PLA into the line next to it then upward) or -v-v-v- (bed being too far away, causing a line that is too tall and not pushing the PLA out to the width expected for the volume). Of course, that requires that your steps per E is pretty dang close to the value it needs to be. If you think it is, just give yourself a couple of one/two layer prints with some fill in them and a skirt to start picking up on what the proper line width should be. Also, a darker color is easier to pick up on the tape/platform as it can look more opaque if the layer is too thin...

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    I commend your ASCII, that's an excellent guideline!

    I did three test prints tonight.

    The first was the Ultimaker Robot and that came out really well.

    I then thought I would try a smaller scale version of the gothic chapel but it seemed like I was dragging stringers all over the place.

    I cleaned the surface...replaced with new (wider) painter's tape and printer this gear out, which has a tic-tac-toe pattern in the middle of it. I printing it using the Fine setting and .2 layer height. Overall it looks really good but, as you can see in the picture below, there's probably a little room for improvement. (Temp was 220c)

    gallery_536_202_105963.jpg

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Progress!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Thanks :) Looking at the inconsistency of the skirt line, I would say you have some slight bed level issues. Bottom right looks too low (looks like the extrusion slid across the tape) while the top left looks too high (extrusion color change indicating the layer is slightly thinner there). Obviously the part printed and stuck to the bed so you are very close on that and any issues after the first two layers are going to be something you are going to want to adjust in the slicer, with either speed or jumping into the advanced settings.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    But if you look at the size of the tape compared to the size of the print, i think the deviation in height in the skirt is not due to an offset of the build platform. The print is rather small, so the offset would be less noticeable.

    Also, if the tape is going in X, the skirt indicates the bed is too high and front AND back, and not in the middle (Left/Right), which is odd.

    Now that i look at it again.. i think we are being fooled by the sharp shadow and the skirt is the same all around ;)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    He did say he used some wider tape, but yes, it's pretty darn close to "correct" and the part obviously made it so it's "close enough" I was just thinking perhaps a quarter/half of a turn down on the screw that's in the top left and a quarter/half turn up on bottom right.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    No special effects were used, honest!

    Its hard to get a good photo inside of these with the iPhone! Especially lit the way I had it.

    Here's the file to test yourselves!

    http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:40410

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Like I said, you really are very close, I was just nitpicking! If I was to suggest something more substantial I would say try to limit the stringing (that stuff inside the holes) by turning your speed up a notch and seeing how that affects things. There are a couple more things that you can try with regards to retraction, but on such a small spread, speed would be my first move.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    How do you calibrate? I was looking for those metal feeler/gap measuring tools at the local hardware store but couldnt find one

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    I simply look at the skirt, that's why I was critical of those two areas in the skirt. Making the skirt further from the part and multiple lines give you a bit more time and distance to eyeball it. As the skirt is printing I adjust the screws as needed. This tends to work very well as I'm usually within a half turn on at most two screws from part to part. Plus, going all crazy with a dial or feeler gauge is faaaaar too time consuming in my opinion for what I'm doing because the only way it would be relevant would be to do it before EVERY part as every time you take one off the build platform, the platform is going to change. Slightly, yes, but it will change a bit. Most times you can print again without an adjustment, but if doesn't immediately pop off, you would want to re-calibrate. I have found that just adjusting it as the skirt is printing gives me more than adequate results, and quick enough to understand that I can teach a student within two or three prints how to get it close enough to print that I don't have to babysit them the entire time. There's no way I'm having them mess with a dial gauge or feeler gauge and having it be as easily understood as quickly as it is. Like I said, just look for a consistent line on the skirt and you are golden, with the top right of the photo being the part that I would strive to achieve all the way around (if it is indeed different). If the photo slightly misrepresents what the skirt looks like, then you are good to go. If you do want to go after the dial/feeler gauge, Amazon is your best friend.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Here's the video of that test print....forgot about this! Left the first 3 mins at normal speed then cranked to 64x

     

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Comments now that you have a better angle :)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Was the part flat across the bottom? If so your first layer looks like it's fine and your bed is level.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Yes.

    Actually I took the advice someone mentioned and adjusted while the nozzle was hot. I used the Ulticontroller to move the X and Y axis around each corner and adjust each bed screw a bit...I stuck with the 'paper fit thru' as a guide for this print...it came out pretty good. Feedback welcome...I think I'll stop messing with it and finally move on to some larger prints (the Eiffel Tower one I see on Thingiverse is calling me)

     

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    .I think I'll stop messing with it and finally move on to some larger prints

     

    If you mean "stop messing with levelling" then good luck with that. Everytime you pop a piece off the bed it changes. Or just over time the bed droops (gets lower and lower every day a tiny bit).

    Don't use the UC to move the head. Just push it around with your hand. On the UC under "prepare" you can do "home all axes" and then conveniently above that is "disable servos" which then allows you to push the head around. Extruder also.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Very nice videos by the way. Good taste on that octopus - I love that one also.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Quick question...bed to nozzle...

    Don't use the UC to move the head. Just push it around with your hand. On the UC under "prepare" you can do "home all axes" and then conveniently above that is "disable servos" which then allows you to push the head around. Extruder also.

     

    Ah, disable servos...that's a great tip

    I've been searching for some other fun things to try printing. The owl came out fantastic (scaled down to 2 inches tall) I wanted to try some of the statue ones I have seen posted on the Ultimaker site but haven't found the STL of them

    Thanks again for all of your assistance.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 56 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
         
         
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
         
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
         
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
         

         
        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
         
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 30 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...