(Back after 2 weeks vacation)
Most likely it's a memory related issue, the released version abuses memory a bit. Can you see if the version from the new support material test also gives you this problem with the same models&settings?
-
Our picks
-
Talking Additive 'Ask Me' about Metal FFF & performance polymers
SandervG posted a topic in Materials & profiles,
Our Application engineer Andrea Ciappi will be online for at least an hour to answer questions you have regarding these performance filaments. Make sure to post your questions with #TalkingAdditive so we'll be able to find them, even if you send them our way prior to to the event.-
- 1 reply
Picked By
SandervG, -
-
Introducing: Ultimaker 2+ Connect
SandervG posted a topic in Ultimaker 3D printers,
Today we are launching a new and improved printer; the Ultimaker 2+ Connect. Following the gigantic footsteps of the workhorse that is the Ultimaker 2+...-
-
- 42 replies
Picked By
SandervG, -
-
Ultimaker Essentials launch
SandervG posted a topic in Ultimaker Essentials,
Today marks the day that Ultimaker Essentials is open for business!-
-
- 0 replies
Picked By
SandervG, -
-
Recommended Posts
gr5 1,471
Well - not what you asked - but you could reduce the polygons by a factor of 2X or 100X potentially without any reduction in resolution (resolution after printed). I love using meshlab:
Click on menu item: "filters" "remeshing..." "quadratic edge collapse decimation". I set quality to 1 as recommended in a shapeways article about this subject.
I had a model of a human with over 10 million polygons but I wanted to print it only .5 inches high. I reduced the polygon count to 10K polygons and it was still more than I needed. After reduction Cura handled it nicely (before reduction Cura had issues).
Link to post
Share on other sites