(Back after 2 weeks vacation)
Most likely it's a memory related issue, the released version abuses memory a bit. Can you see if the version from the new support material test also gives you this problem with the same models&settings?
-
Our picks
-
Special introduction: Ultimaker Cura engine improvements with Arachne alpha
SandervG posted a topic in Ultimaker Cura,
We don't often release an alpha version of Ultimaker Cura... So what's different this time? This Alpha contains such a huge slicing engine overhaul that we really need your help!-
-
- 7 replies
Picked By
SandervG, -
-
Ultimaker Innovators list 2020
SandervG posted a topic in Official news,
We wish to celebrate and honor the innovators that push forward the field, technology and world. We opted to not present it as a competition or ranked list. Every innovator has earned his spot on that list in their own way. We also look at the 3D printing industry as a whole and not limit the list to those only using Ultimaker.-
-
- 3 replies
Picked By
SandervG, -
-
Recommended Posts
gr5 1,510
Well - not what you asked - but you could reduce the polygons by a factor of 2X or 100X potentially without any reduction in resolution (resolution after printed). I love using meshlab:
Click on menu item: "filters" "remeshing..." "quadratic edge collapse decimation". I set quality to 1 as recommended in a shapeways article about this subject.
I had a model of a human with over 10 million polygons but I wanted to print it only .5 inches high. I reduced the polygon count to 10K polygons and it was still more than I needed. After reduction Cura handled it nicely (before reduction Cura had issues).
Link to post
Share on other sites