Jump to content

S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS


V3DPrinting

Recommended Posts

Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
19 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

I decided to try the adhesion sheets in an attempt to save my build plates.  The are generally out of stock at the local agents, so if they damage it is a problem

 

Ok great. Then get yourself a hammer and chisel first so that you can knock the printed parts off the surface.

 

 

19 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

I am looking at mSLA printer now as well as UM has just become too expensive for me, I cannot keep up anymore.  I have too much printing to do for my single S3 and S7 or Factor 4 is more that what I can justify. 

I don't quite understand.

If the UM is too expensive for you, it might be better to buy an FDM printer from another manufacturer.


MSLA is actually not comparable to FDM.

The printers are supposedly cheaper, but working with them costs a lot of money.

And that may sound like a joke, but it's the same with SLS. Printers are cheap but the parts are expensive.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
On 7/6/2024 at 4:45 PM, UlrichC-DE said:

 

Ok great. Then get yourself a hammer and chisel first so that you can knock the printed parts off the surface.

 

Yea I noticed that.  Even something like ASA sticks like crazy 😄  For ASA if I warm the bed up to 90C again after the print, I can pull them off.  

 

On 7/6/2024 at 4:45 PM, UlrichC-DE said:

I don't quite understand.

If the UM is too expensive for you, it might be better to buy an FDM printer from another manufacturer.

 

hhmmm.... I am not talking about the cheaper brands of mSLA printers.  If we decided to invest further into 3D printing capacity, it would either be UM or something along the lines of Formlabs.  There are pro's and con's to both.  For me, Ideally I would have loved to stick with UM but S7 bundle it is way more expensive than something like FL Form 4 even.  With regards to the prints being cheaper, while that may be the case, this only applies (in my experience so please do not crucify me) if you can get away without using dissolvable support, with we sometimes have to do.

 

My question with regards to the S7 and S5 is whether it is the right thing to do to invest in them as it seems (with Factor 4) UM has now (with Factor 4)  also adopted direct drive as opposed to Bowden Tubes.  

 

As this 'need to increase in capacity' is due to small batch manufacturing, print speed will be crucial.  We simply will not be able to print 10 hours on one enclosure if we need to do 500. The question to which I do not have the answer as I have no experience with Resin is how much post processing is needed on part after being printed blazingly quickly with the Form 4.  

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS

     

    Unfortunately, I don't understand that again.

    Formlabs does not have MSLA printers. As far as I know, Formlabs only builds SLA and SLS printers.


    The common misconception

    *SLA and SLS are not a new innovative solution for better printing, nor are they a replacement for FDM.

    They are different processes in themselves, each with their own results and conditions.

    In the hobby, one may be more beautiful and more important than the other. In reality, it depends on the parts you want to produce. The price of the printer itself is not so relevant at first.

     

    About the process

    If you could decide between hobby or series production, it would be easier.

    Because with the SLA and MSLA printers you have a higher throughput of parts if a corresponding process is established. Otherwise, it makes little sense compared to FDM printing. Just switching on the printer somewhere and printing something is simply not possible with the *SLA/SLS process. In the case of *SLA, the printers require an air-conditioned room. In the case of SLS, even a room with controlled humidity.

     

    About the parts

    FDM and SLS work with polymer plastics. SLA and MSLA work with resins.

    Everything that comes out of the SLA and MSLA printers is therefore only "like" plastic.

    You need to build up experience with it. If necessary, retest and adapt your product line. A 1:1 change is not possible.

    Resins have properties that polymers do not have.

    In particular, dimensional stability correlates with brittleness. This is why this printing process quickly becomes an adventure in the technical field.

     

    Regarding your question about future investment

    If you want to commit yourself to just one type and manufacturer and printer, it always sounds to me like "Should I cut off my right or left arm".

     

    Regarding your question about production.

    If you need a part that you can produce in 10 hours on the printer 500 times, this is probably calculable. You can also download the software from Form and play around with it.

    Since you seem to have an Ultimaker, you can think about how many more of these printers you might need.

    You can request the part from external manufacturers with different processes.

    You can get a plastic injection molding machine. You can lease or buy a 5-axis CNC center.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
    23 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    Unfortunately, I don't understand that again.

    Formlabs does not have MSLA printers. As far as I know, Formlabs only builds SLA and SLS printers.

     

    Hi - 

     

    Hmm...  I thought mSLA is the technology where LCD screen is used as apposed to laser.  If this is the case, then yes Formlabs does indeed produce a mSLA printer in the new Form4 which uses a LCD panel similar to many of the other resin printers.

    About the rest - thank you for your thoughts.   I realize both have the advantages and Formlabs (according to the many videos I watched) seems the have process a little less "messy" than the rest due the cartridge system as well as some filtering in the machines themselves. 

     

    I am aware of (some) the advantages of both systems and coming from FDM background it is not an easy call to make to invest $6500 (and then some) into a new technology that I am not familiar with.  Just trying to make the right decision here.  My concerns with SLA (or mSLA for that matter) is the amount of post processing required after washing and curing and of course - whether anyone agrees or not - the pricing of the resin affects the part cost and if it is too expensive for the client, then there is no use.

     

    23 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    Regarding your question about future investment

    If you want to commit yourself to just one type and manufacturer and printer, it always sounds to me like "Should I cut off my right or left arm".

     

    Well I would argue that if I stick with FDM and both printers are Ultimaker, I would not have to stock both 1.75mm and 2.85mm filament for one.  Second getting to know the eco systems will be easier than using two different machines and the same parts (for most) could be used between eg. UM S3 and S5.  And my OCD would not go off the rails 🤣

    Thanks again for all the feedback.

     

    ps:  I did download various slicers to test and simulate the same prints.  In terms of speed, there is one very clear winner and that is the FORM4 from Formlabs.  It out Performs anything else by a mile.  The same print job that takes that printer 2 hours to complete, will take 13h+ one most FDM machines (according to the slicers).  On the downside, it is also the most expensive upfront cost and most expensive per part.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
    3 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

    Hmm...  I thought mSLA is the technology where LCD screen is used as apposed to laser.  If this is the case, then yes Formlabs does indeed produce a mSLA printer in the new Form4 which uses a LCD panel similar to many of the other resin printers.

    I actually didn't know that FormLabs also builds MSLA (i.e. with LCD) with the Form 4.

    Soon probably also FDM printers

     

    3 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

    About the rest - thank you for your thoughts.   I realize both have the advantages and Formlabs (according to the many videos I watched) seems the have process a little less "messy" than the rest due the cartridge system as well as some filtering in the machines themselves. 

    The only really great thing about the shape is the built-in wiper. But otherwise you will always be standing in front of the printer wearing a gas mask and thick rubber gloves. Other manufacturers also have filling systems, but the printer does not clean itself.

     

    3 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

    I am aware of (some) the advantages of both systems and coming from FDM background it is not an easy call to make to invest $6500 (and then some) into a new technology that I am not familiar with.  Just trying to make the right decision here.  My concerns with SLA (or mSLA for that matter) is the amount of post processing required after washing and curing and of course - whether anyone agrees or not - the pricing of the resin affects the part cost and if it is too expensive for the client, then there is no use.

    In any case, the technology is cheap if it is needed. In the case of FDM and SLA, there may be orders and plans behind it that make this technology a real weapon. In the area of development, it is obvious. It is similar in the area of production, but requires a little more imagination and test series.

     

    3 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

    Well I would argue that if I stick with FDM and both printers are Ultimaker, I would not have to stock both 1.75mm and 2.85mm filament for one.  Second getting to know the eco systems will be easier than using two different machines and the same parts (for most) could be used between eg. UM S3 and S5.  And my OCD would not go off the rails 🤣

    I always look at as much as possible and test some things out. But when it comes to production, I believe that the machines themselves have to pay for themselves at some point. This is more difficult with SLA/MSLA than with an FDM.

     

    The printing times depend on the resin. the more stable / flexible you want it to be, the longer the times will be. standard resin is usually very brittle and becomes the consistency of shockolade at 70-80 degrees. it is therefore advisable to have parts printed for testing before purchasing. This is of course only interesting for technical parts.

     

    I hope you continue to enjoy printing.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
    4 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    I actually didn't know that FormLabs also builds

     

    It is brand new, think it was launched a month ago.  Here they (both UM and FL) are about 33% more expensive than elsewhere due to shipping and our weak currency, so that make the investment a bit steeper.

     

    My reasoning for looking at FL was two fold:

    • Speed - It wipes the floor even with it predecessor (Form 3) and just about any other SLA printer out there.
    • Surface finish and other challenging geometries which I am finding hard to print with good results on my S3

    so I thought IF we invest further, maybe it is not a bad idea to have two different technologies, so we can use the appropriate one when needed BUT it seems the FL, due to the resin and other running costs, makes the manufactured parts to expensive.  Our market here is not really suitable to rely one small prototype print runs for which you can charge more, to have some sort of ROI we would need to do medium sized print runs and they are price sensitive.

     

    The reasoning for considering UM (also looked at BL X1C) was the

    • there is little to now post processing
    • We are familiar with the environment 
    • filament is a hell of a lot cheaper than FL resin
    • very few other consumables really (no IPA, no Resin tank replacements etc.)

    But that would not give me the option of the nicer surface finishes or the other geometries I am currently unable to replicate.  On top of that I heard rumors the S5 might not be in production for very long and spare parts might become a bit harder to obtain.  S7 and Factor for is more than what I can justify spending at the moment as 3D printing is NOT my core business, PCB design is 🙂 

     

     

    5 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    The only really great thing about the shape is the built-in wiper. But otherwise you will always be standing in front of the printer wearing a gas mask and thick rubber gloves. Other manufacturers also have filling systems, but the printer does not clean itself.

     

    The local agent claims this is a worry free process as you do not have to clean resin tanks, you simply swop them out.  This of course mean you have to have multiple resin tanks 🤣

     

    5 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    The printing times depend on the resin. the more stable / flexible you want it to be, the longer the times will be. standard resin is usually very brittle and becomes the consistency of shockolade at 70-80 degrees

     

    Anything other than the standard FL resin here is way too expensive and you will not be able to recover those costs. As an example, a current project I am quoting is is for 400-500 enclosures every two months.  The target price is $10.45.

     

    Each enclosure (if the sliver is anything to go by) will use 100ml of resin.  Here the cost resin is:

     

    • Standard: $127 /L
    • Tough: $235 /L

     

    The math is easy then, the part will either cost $12.70 or $23.50.  This is not even keeping in mind that you will use 2-3 resin tanks for 500 enclosures and not sure how much IPA cleaning the parts.   Both of these exceeding the target price which is currently the client's cost for having the enclosures made from Aluminium sheeting.  

     

    So the decision seems easy then, just need to come to terms with it 😁

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
    5 minutes ago, friedl_basson said:

    The local agent claims this is a worry free process as you do not have to clean resin tanks, you simply swop them out.  This of course mean you have to have multiple resin tanks 🤣

    Help, that's not very credible. Having several tanks is not a mistake. Someone still has to clean the replaced tanks.

    Throwing away only makes sense if your employer comes on the horse and pays with gold ducats.

     

    12 minutes ago, friedl_basson said:

    The math is easy then, the part will either cost $12.70 or $23.50.  This is not even keeping in mind that you will use 2-3 resin tanks for 500 enclosures and not sure how much IPA cleaning the parts.   Both of these exceeding the target price which is currently the client's cost for having the enclosures made from Aluminium sheeting.

    You can also work with a pre-cleaner (so a station more). Then you save on IPA. However, I cannot recommend IPA. Spirit is more tolerable in the long run.

    15 minutes ago, friedl_basson said:

    So the decision seems easy then, just need to come to terms with it 😁

    If it won't leave you alone. Maybe get yourself a UniFormation GKtwo printer. It's like Form only without the wiper. Or an Elegoo Saturn * - it will make msla parts.

    A little slower. But you're paying money for goods and not for a vision. Almost like in real life. Customers are happy to pay for reliability, know-how, function and quality.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS

    Hi @UlrichC-DE - 

     

    20 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    Someone still has to clean the replaced tanks.

     

    Well... it gets worse actually, I will be burning through about 3 resin vats one each pint job, so that costs needs to he factored in.  Own the plus side, then I do not need to clean them 🤣

     

    20 hours ago, UlrichC-DE said:

    UniFormation GKtwo printer.

     

    This looks really promising and the reviews seems good!  I can actually buy this bundle and a second hand S5 bundle for less than one new Form 4.  Then I can sell my S3 locally and would have (what seems to be) two improved machines to the one I currently have.  Question is whether it is still a good investment being S5's? 

     

    Regards

    Friedl.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS

    If you are currently producing with Ultimaker, you can continue to scale with Ultimaker.


    If you don't want to do that, you first have to add other printers and somehow get them into production. Because in general, adding new technology and removing things that are no longer needed is a viable strategy. I think everything new and different is risky. No matter how great your new printers will be, you first have to get them to produce something great.

     

    However, I see MSLA and similar printer technologies as a rather strategic thing that has to come entirely from the play money account. Let's put it this way. It's not what you would initially expect as an operator of FDM printers. Even parts from the SLS printer quickly become boring. If the hype about FDM printers had just emerged today, it would be the game changer from the long misery with resin and powder.

     

    My view comes from the background that I produce and have produced technical printed parts of various technologies every day. The customers don't care how I produce. (as long as I don't employ children of course) What is important is their function and reliability. So if I wanted to start replacing my printers, I would first have to restore the status quo.
    I'm probably a bit too demanding. If you have a colleague who uses other printers, I recommend having parts printed. Because that's what it should be about. "Parts"

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · S5 Glassplate chipping with ABS
    4 hours ago, friedl_basson said:

    Well... it gets worse actually, I will be burning through about 3 resin vats one each pint job, so that costs needs to he factored in.  Own the plus side, then I do not need to clean them

    Practically, in terms of cost, you can also talk to an injection molding parts manufacturer.

    The tooling costs are in the region of 10k steps but the parts are cheap afterwards. That's why you still need 3D printers. But this way you avoid the problem of actually working for free. Unfortunately, this is generally a trap with the whole 3D printing technology. When it goes into series production, it becomes work that can no longer be done in passing as with individual parts

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.8 Stable released 🎉
        In the Cura 5.8 stable release, everyone can now tune their Z seams to look better than ever. Method series users get access to new material profiles, and the base Method model now has a printer profile, meaning the whole Method series is now supported in Cura!
        • 3 replies
      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 3 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...