Jump to content

Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.


SBStudios

Recommended Posts

Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

I know not everyone wants to read the full story, so I'm breaking it down into two sections.

 

Short Version:

 

My Miniatures using Tree structures are are too weak at the connecting point and parts get knocked over by the extruder before they connect to the main part of the model. I do not want to add z hop to the printer as it effectively doubles the printing time.

 

Also, in this process, the parts are too stringy. I'm assuming I have to raise my temp, but I don't know for sure. Any help on either of these are appreciated.

 

Setup:

 

Software: Cura 4.1 attached to an OctoPrint Server on OctoPi

3D Printer: Iverntech D1 Kossel Delta with Heated and Self-Leveling bed. (Similar to Anycubic Kossel Delta with added features)

Filament: Inland Brand PLA+ 1.75mm (Print Temp 205C-225C)

Nozzle: 0.4mm (Will be switching to 0.25mm in the semi-near future)

 

Long Version:

 

I'm trying to print a few miniatures for a DND campaign that my cousin runs, and I can't seem to get the settings right in Cura. I've been playing around with the settings for the last 4 weeks now and I'm actually starting to get frustrated. Before the PLA+ I was running normal PLA and it printed "Okay" at best.

 

After playing around with the settings, I got the PLA+ quality to match closely to that of the normal PLA. However, now parts of the model on a tree structure (which I know is experimental) get knocked over by the extruder before connecting to the main model. I think the points are weak for easy cleanup, but its still knocking everything over. The theory that the support is too thin at connection is supported by another print where the model was increased to 125% scaling in cura and the structures were sound.

 

Also, When I'm printing the model gets blobs and stringy bits between "Floating" sections on that layer. what can I do to reduce both of these issues? Images and exported profile attached.

 

Any help or suggestions is greatly appreciated!!

 

IMG_0554.thumb.jpg.b9840aa97bcb73a78910ef184cdffa25.jpgIMG_0557.thumb.jpg.e39a8c15a527644c455af0d3655746c4.jpgIMG_0555.thumb.jpg.18dcb48080e7970643fbaa23d5523863.jpgPreview_Nameless_Hero.thumb.JPG.85253854eee883d54c987e39e1d7e8b4.JPGPrepare_nameless_hero.JPG.db5cdf18dd63da34a0d1ed738d2a650d.JPGModel_Profile.curaprofile

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    Sorry I just skimmed and I'm only addressing stringing. 

    1) Lower temp helps stringing more than increased.

    2) Slowing down helps even more because there is less pressure in the nozzle

    3) The most important is retraction.  Your models appear to be quite small so the default retraction settings are probably way off.  The key thing is: 

    retraction minimum travel  (lower that maybe to 0?)

    maximum retration count (raise that maybe to 100?)

     

    Look at your part in layer view and turn on the checkbox to see "moves" in blue and note the dark blue versus light blue moves.  One is a retracting move (light blue) and the other is non-retracting.  You want to get rid of all the non-retracting moves between parts of your model.

     

    Note however if you do too many retractions on the same exact spot of filament that you can grind it down to a point where you get a print failure (stops extruding).  This is less likely at lower speeds (means lower pressure in nozzle which means lower stress on filament at feeder).  But typically if the same spot of filament goes through the feeder back and forth more than 20 times it can cause a failure.  But if printing slow 100 times should be okay.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    Note also that smaller nozzles and longer nozzles leak less so string less.  A friend of mine has an e3dv6 0.4mm nozzle that leaks much more than my 3dsolex 0.4mm nozzle for this reason.  The "race" nozzles from 3dsolex have more internal geometry which means more surface area for the liquid filament to stick to which can reduce stringing (and ironically lower viscosity due to better heat transfer).

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    One more thing - get a butane pen that makes a flame.  Put the flame over those strings for about 1/10 of a second.  It will make many of them disappear.  The remaining ones need to be removed mechanically.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    Thank you for the reply, I just got home and I'm about to try this for the stringing, thank you!

     

    Also, the biggest issue for me is the parts that are falling off when knocked over by the extruder, do you or anyone else have any experience with this? Any hints or tips would be appreciated with that as well. At least to get going in the right direction.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    in Cura 4.1.0 I only have travels in dark blue and the light blue are support structures. How do I check for the different types of travel, and eliminate the non-retracting travels? 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    Alternatively; enable the ooze shield and print more models at the same time. The ooze shield will give it something to wipe the nozzle on and printing more models at once will allow for more time for the layers to cool.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 4.1 Quality is stringy and tree structure fails.

    the antler-like constructs on the left photo were explained to me as "antennae" and result from there being a tiny bit of filament drooping from the nozzle as it approaches a wall. It deposits that drop on the perimeter of the wall forming the root of an antenna. Then the next layer the drop hits the prior drop, and so on, forming those upward-growing antlers.

     

    So probably using a bit more retraction might help.

     

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...