2 minutes ago, Kenobinai said:Or maybe create some beta/alpha groups, etc.
We tried to do this (as it has been suggested quite a few times). Unfortunately, no-one seems willing to then actually test things and report them. We got so little info from this that it just wasn't worth the effort. We might try again some time in the future.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
11
6
5
5
Popular Days
Jan 3
12
Jan 2
6
Sep 2
5
Jan 20
5
Top Posters In This Topic
nallath 11 posts
Kenobinai 6 posts
ahoeben 5 posts
MaxQ 5 posts
Popular Days
Jan 3 2020
12 posts
Jan 2 2020
6 posts
Sep 2 2019
5 posts
Jan 20 2020
5 posts
Popular Posts
Nerfstrike
I think I figured it out. I was looking at some forums about internet slowing down cura, and apparently cura tries to connect to web printer servers like octoprint. I am on a large wireless network be
nallath
In 4.5 we also switch to a much more extensive crash logging system, so let's hope it gives us what we need 🙂
ahoeben
@imcarterschmidt could you check the Cura 4.5 beta, with that plugin enabled? A third party component in that plugin has been fixed/updated by UM, which hopefully fixes these performance issues.
Posted Images
Kenobinai 0
First of all, I just want to say thanks. Cura is indeed an awesome software, and thank you for making this free for everyone. I have it running flawlessly on my laptop, and it works 100% OK and fast.
That said, and as a past dev and now a somewhat delivery manager these days, if users are experiencing issues related to a particular hardware this should be flagged somehow. A little warning or note on the download page would do, this would save many hours for everyone; I wouldn't spend hours trying versions, reading through numerous threads, and you would have to reply to multiple threads/issues flagged.
On these (Ryzen) issues, I've never experienced any. The only issues I've ever had on this machine have been with Cura. Either by trying to use it normally, or by running on a VM, which crashed VirtualBox on some Linux dists (got it running now on lubuntu).
All of these posts are also more than 1 year old.
I still think that my initial comment still holds, you need a better (exhaustive) QA process. I know, QA sucks, but on the other hand it looks like you need different platforms/systems to test your software, so... new toys 😄.
Or maybe create some beta/alpha groups, etc.
Anyway, Happy New Year, and once again thank you for your work.
Link to post
Share on other sites