Jump to content

Help understanding PVA support settings


JD-Art

Recommended Posts

Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

Hi my name is John. And I'm new here to the forum. 🙂


I have been working with 3D printing for some years on a hobby level, mainly on a Prusa.
And just recently upgraded to a dual head Ultimaker printer.

 

So I'm totally new to Pva support. and have a question I hop to get some help whit.

 

Using Cura 4.4.1
Im trying to make full support of the Pva "Good tight squise 😉


Support Z, Top and Bottom distance. all set to 0
Support x/y distance set to 0

 

"I think its a problem whit my stair height, but not 100% sure"
Support stair height set to 0 (default 0.1 gives same result)

 

Expectations settings all to 0 its a print where the Pla and Pva has no air between them. eg.

01.thumb.png.f740f0494010ec896c5177de11ccc455.png

Green: Pla, Yellow: Pva

 

But most the time I get this. dual layered pva with pla squished on top of it

02.thumb.png.4c800eda262b8d56a8429047cf60a4e6.png

 

Sorry for the image quality

03.thumb.png.5df2c0cdde7d3b56afc25f6e0af5a0e2.png

 

 

Looking Forward to hearing any suggestions.

 

 

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

    I do not have a dual nozzle printer, so no personal experience. But I do vaguely remember that supports might be printed at double layer-height, or beginning from a thicker minimum, or something like that, since it does not melt so nice as PLA. So, if the PVA would print at 0.2mm layers, and PLA at 0.1, you might get this effect. Could be an explanation. But I am not sure, it is just a vague memory, you need to check. Maybe you could search for this and find more info?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

    Hej Geert
    Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure this is the problem, as far as I can see both extruders have 1.0 layer height set in Cura.  "don't know if Cura have some hidden setting overwriting this?"

     

    When looking at the print, to me it looks like its the same layer height. the Pva just prints every other layer double.

     

    Also when the (Support Stair Step Height) has the same value or lover then the layer height. this should not effect it. right?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    • 2 weeks later...
    Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

    Hi all


    I still have a problem with the PVA layers, any thoughts! 🙂

     

    Also if anyone have some ideas to reducing the start blob. I'm already using the coasting function. Whits make me think it more a layer start problem then layer ending problem?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

    test_top_v3.stl

    Hi. here's the .stl thanks for helping.

     

    The layer problem is on all layers with Pva so from 0-16 approximately.

    "start blob is on all layers"

     

    Yes all layer heights are set the same.

     

    Pla layer height: 0.15

    Pva layer height: 0.15

    Support stair step height: 0.15 (set to 0 gives same result)

    Support layer thickness: 0.15

    Support interface thickness: 0.15

    Support interface resolution: 0.15

     

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

    Sharing your project is a lot easier. Just save the project and send that file, so that all settings are automatically included.

     

    For now I'll just reproduce your project from your description though..

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Help understanding PVA support settings

    You were going in the right direction, but amde a wrong turn.

     

    Reducing the stair stepping to zero prevents some unwanted behavior, but reducing the interface thickness is a bad idea. That makes the interface areas very small, such that they sometimes are too small to be printed. If you don't want a support interface you can simply disable it.

    Other than that you might want to set the minimum support XY distance to zero as well. Or set the Priority to XY overrides Z.

     

    See the project file attached.

    UM3_test_top_v3.3mf

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...