UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Figured it out. In Machine settings Extruder 1 and 2 End Gcode
G91
G1 Z10 ; Set to whatever clearance required.
G90
Next, ensure "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height" is set to 0. (Very important)
Also Uncheck "Z Hop after extruder switch".
Seems to be a bug in Cura 4.6 where regardless of "Z Hop after extruder switch" being unchecked, if a value other than 0 remains in "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height", the code which drops the nozzle before moving to the new position is inserted into the gcode. IMO, these 2 settings are very poorly thought out and hence troublesome if not useless. Further "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height" is hidden from view if either "Z Hop when retracted" or "Z Hop after extruder switch" is unchecked. This is a problem because despite being hidden, if "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height" contained a positive value before it was hidden, this value will be translated into gcode, causing the problem.
One problem I've found is that the resulting nozzle return move is synchronous, meaning the new z height and XY coordinates are all in the one move. On small prints, this is unlikely to be an issue, but on large surface, its possible the second nozzle may scrape as it approaches its new position. It would be better to have the XY coordinates sent in one move, then the Z move to follow. This would prevent any chance of nozzle scrape.
So, not perfect, but at least usable.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements. Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
dannssy 0
Figured it out. In Machine settings Extruder 1 and 2 End Gcode
G91 G1 Z10 ; Set to whatever clearance required. G90
Next, ensure "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height" is set to 0. (Very important)
Also Uncheck "Z Hop after extruder switch".
Seems to be a bug in Cura 4.6 where regardless of "Z Hop after extruder switch" being unchecked, if a value other than 0 remains in "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height", the code which drops the nozzle before moving to the new position is inserted into the gcode. IMO, these 2 settings are very poorly thought out and hence troublesome if not useless. Further "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height" is hidden from view if either "Z Hop when retracted" or "Z Hop after extruder switch" is unchecked. This is a problem because despite being hidden, if "Z Hop After Extruder Switch Height" contained a positive value before it was hidden, this value will be translated into gcode, causing the problem.
One problem I've found is that the resulting nozzle return move is synchronous, meaning the new z height and XY coordinates are all in the one move. On small prints, this is unlikely to be an issue, but on large surface, its possible the second nozzle may scrape as it approaches its new position. It would be better to have the XY coordinates sent in one move, then the Z move to follow. This would prevent any chance of nozzle scrape.
So, not perfect, but at least usable.
Link to post
Share on other sites