Jump to content

Flexible Filaments comparison


rhymeandreason

Recommended Posts

Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

Flex PLA seems to be quite sensitive to temperature... On the filament reel, it's indicated temperatures exceeding 220C should not be used. Har-har. According to my tests, it's impossible to get meaningful results below 230C. Here's how printing at 225C looks like:

225C

When looking at the stripes closer, they actually seem a bit furry. In case of this print, the situation could be saved by increasing the temperature to 230C - by just 5C!

Here's a in image of a piece printed at 230C:

230C

The flat surface is actually smooth as silk - surprisingly good in my opinion. Round, vertical shapes don't print nearly as well, but keeping the temperature at 230C I can get satisfactory results. If I go above 230C, I see decrease in quality; here's a comparison of pieces printed at 230C and at 235C:

235C vs 230C

The holes are for 3mm screws, so they are relatively small details. While the ones printed at 230C seem quite OK, the ones printed at 235C are somewhat malformed.

For the prints in this post I used Flex PLA from Ultimaker, 0.075mm layer height, 130% material flow (!) and 40mm/s speed. So far my conclusion is - after ditching UM2's original feeder, it is possible to make nice prints with Flex PLA - and you can make things you can't make with harder materials. However, the material is fairly sensitive for different parameters. Also, UM2's original filament reel holder should not be used as soft filament can get stuck to the reel when the reel is rotated by pulling the filament. I'm using a lazy Susan on the floor, it works nicely.

For the recent prints I haven't used any additional oil for the filament; with IRobertI's feeder it doesn't seem to be necessary.

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    • Replies 119
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    So far I have used glue stick for bed adhesion. I haven't yet worried about the aesthetics of the first layer. Instead, as I now needed to print fairly thin strips (the center is only 0.6mm thick), I used uniform layer height (0.075mm) right from the beginning.

    As bed temperatures, I have used 40-60C. In general Flex PLA sticks to the bed really well. I have used warm water to remove the prints from the bed, other methods have proven to be either very time consuming or too violent for Flex PLA.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    More than a little related to this topic... I wrote another forum post about apparent aftermath following my Flex PLA tests:

    http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/5311-sudden-change-in-material-flow-scale/

    It looks like Flex PLA is quite a tricky material - not only when it's used but also for a long time after.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    My experience with Plastic2Print Flexible Polyester

    Well, not very good. Even with Robert feeder I have problems.

    The material is flexible, but not elastic. It is difficult to explain. Just print a ring. You can deform the ring very easily, but you cannot expand it, you cannot make it bigger.

    The filament produces a tie/spiral in robert's feeder. I do not know what to do!!

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Did you try adding a drop of oil?

    Did you try printing slower (maybe 10mm/sec)?

    Did you increase nozzle temp?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Did you try adding a drop of oil?

    Did you try printing slower (maybe 10mm/sec)?

    Did you increase nozzle temp?

     

    No. I printed it at 50 mm/s... and I saw some under extrusion. I want to try increasing flow rate and I will follow your advices.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    So, As I said, Plastic2Print Flexible Polyester, is flexible but not elastic. You cannot increase the size of a ring.

    Can people recommend me one flex material with this property after printed (elasticity)?

    Thanks in advance.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    ProfePaco, a few notes:

    1) I have high hopes on Roberts feeder for printing flexible filament, but no time to test it myself yet.

    Did you cut off a part of the Bowden tube to use as an insert to have "guiding walls" for flexible filament?

    See here:

    https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/files.youmagine.com/uploads/image/file/45852/medium_insertBowden.JPG

    This would be necessary or otherwise the filament would curl, especially at high volume extrusion speeds. Also, 50mm/s at 0.2mm layer height is a pretty high volume extrusion speed (lower either the speed or the layer height to reduce the, but you still need the guiding Bowden).

    2) You can measure rubber-like filament with Shore hardness. NinjaFlex is about 85A which is the softest/most rubber-like filament I know of. After that comes The FPE40D which you tested (the link you provided) which is actually pretty soft I think. The FPE45D is a bit harder and can be successfully extruded in the UM2 stock feeder.

    3) You might want to ready this thread for pointers on printing flexible filament successfully (I hope Roberts feeder might be a good addition to that thread):

    http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/4197-improving-the-um2-feeder-mechanism-for-flexible-filament/

    for more info, some of the important stuff from that thread and "Sanjays thread" I pasted below here:

    "- print at a completely constant velocity, for perimeters, infill, everything. Make it quite slow - around 30mm/s all round - don't use a slower first layer. The reason for this is that we want to print this stuff in as much of a steady state system as possible. Changes in velocity and extrude rate affect the output flow rate of the extrudate in a drastic way. Travel moves should be made as quickly as your machine can handle them. Retraction should be aggressive and quite long.

    - Printing too quickly, or having the slightest glitch in you extruder-hotend filament path will cause buckling.

    - these filaments act like a spring when compressed and driven down to the hotend. If your hobbed bolt stops turning there is still stored pressure in the system and filament will continue to extrude/ooze."

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    I guess this thread is as good as any to post my first test with Ninja Flex which was provided by gadgetfreak above (thanks!) with my new feeder. So far it seems to work pretty decent. The knurled bolt seems to want to twist the filament though which is a bit of an issue for prints that use a lot of filament. This print only used 4-5m and it was still twisting it enough that it wanted to jump off the spool.

    Also my print quality on this first attempt is pretty crap. But, more experimentation is needed. For the first test I just picked settings semi-randomly. 0.1mm, 30mm/s, 230C, retraction enabled, 0.8mm top/bottom.

    I think this is too hot because the surface is "fluffy", like there's air inside the filament (boiling perhaps?). It seems pretty darn strong though, I had to twist it a lot harder than I thought before I got layer separation.

    Buuuut, it's way too late and my brain is only half awake, will have to sleep on it. But here's some pictures (they are giant if you want to zoom in more closely).

    handle01

    handle02

    handle03

    handle04

    handle05

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Looks pretty nice for a first test.

    One question about this. Do you still need to oil the filament a bit? I'm concerned about the mess it could cause in the system?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Hi Iroberti

    That is a very good print, what do you mean by fluffy ? on my limited trials with the little bit i had i was unable to get a smooth finish it felt like a rough texture and this was at 220 with layer heights of 1.5 and retraction 3mm with a speed of 20

    I have just had an email from DHL to say my ninja from Daniel will arrive today so i can get on with some testing tonight... :smile:

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    @Didier: I did not use any oil.

    @cor3ys: The surface looks a little bit like a sponge, porous, rather than solid if that makes any sense? But it sounds like that is to be expected judging from your reactions.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    No oil that's a good point :)

    What about the fumes?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    @cor3ys and @IRobertI: You both test the Ninjaflex with an UM2, don't you?

    Has anyone tested it with an UM1 (maybe gadgetfreak?)? Maybe I missed this information; sorry if it was written somewhere... ;)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Hi Dim3nsioneer

    Yes i have tested it with a UM2 all be it with a tiny amount of flex material This is only able to be done using IRoberti Feeder design for the UM2, I had no luck at all trying it with the stock feeder on a um2...

    Iroberti print above was also done on a UM2 using his feeder design.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    @Didier: This stuff (Ninja Flex) seems very very low on the smell side. I'd say it smells even less than good quality PLA. Now, I don't know what kind of fumes might be hidden that I can't smell but...

    Right now I'm printing out "MiniCalTest" pieces, trying out some temperature changes and retraction settings. 5 down and a few more to go I guess hehe :) So far changing retraction settings doesn't seem to change much in the actual print but I'm doing it incrementally so we'll see. I also have to try at thicker layers to see if that makes a difference.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Right, time to show what I've been playing around with for the past couple of days. Basically I've just been experimenting with temperature and retraction settings, and a couple of layer heights.

    First of all, please try to ignore the exposure/whitebalance being all over the bloody place. I was using incandescents and flash in a nice little mix that makes everything look like poop, hopefully the details will show up decently though (the original images are very big so you can zoom in quite a bit for more detail).

    This is the thing I've been printing:

    minical0

    And these are the settings I used (#1 is the base, the rest only show what I changed from the previous print):

     

    1. 30mm/s
      0.1mm
      235C
      45C (bed)
      Retraction: 25mm/s, 4.5mm
      Travel: 200mm/s
    2. 210C That went well... :p
    3. 240C
    4. 235C
      Retraction: 25mm/s, 5.5mm
    5. Retraction: 25mm/s, 6.5mm
    6. Retraction: 35mm/s, 6.5mm
    7. 0.2mm
      This caused a bit of underextrusion and walls not being fused correctly in some places
    8. 20mm/s

    minical1

    minical2

    minical3

    It looks like going up in layer height helps with stringing more so than increasing retraction settings. Or maybe I didn't go high enough. Input is welcome.

    And before I went to bed I printed another froggy at 2x scale with these settings:

    235C

    0.16mm

    Retraction: 35mm/s, 6.5mm

    20mm/s

    flexFrog1

    flexFrog2

    flexFrog3

    flexFrog4

     

    So I've now logged about 24 hours of printing NinjaFlex with my new feeder. Seems to work decently so far. I wish the surface quality was better though but again, maybe that's just to be expected with this material.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Nice testing Robert!!

    Did you manage to solve the twisting of the filament somehow?

    How many meters of print was the frog?

    I think that it would be an interesting test to put the roll/spool directly in front/below the feeder instead of at a 90 degree angle (like the stock feeder) to see whether it has any effect.

    Also did you check Sanjays thread with recommendations on printing flexible filament, especially these notes:

    "You can't eliminate ooze entirely with these filaments is the conclusion I came to, but there are strategies you can take that make a huge improvement to how they print. The first is to print at a completely constant velocity, for perimeters, infill, everything. Make it quite slow - around 30mm/s all round - don't use a slower first layer. The reason for this is that we want to print this stuff in as much of a steady state system as possible. Changes in velocity and extrude rate affect the output flow rate of the extrudate in a drastic way. Travel moves should be made as quickly as your machine can handle them. Retraction should be aggressive and quite long. I usually use 0.5mm for PLA/ABS, for all the flex prints shown I used 1.5mm. Lastly you should watch your temps, higher temps make extruding easier, but the extrudate is runnier and oozes more. Try and print at as low temp as you can get away with.

    "

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Hi Guys

    I did a 5 hour print of the octopus to compare it with sanjays print in his thread, i think it come out slightly better than his but i made the mistake of not putting the fan on and went to bed, so you can see where it started to over heat on top of the head.

    0.15 layers

    220 degrees

    50 degrees bed

    3mm retraction

    25 retraction speed.

    3 shells

    20% infill

    octopus 1

     

    octopus 2

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    Wow, impressed by the perseverance to get Ninjaflex working.

    About a month ago I bought a Lulzbot with a https://www.lulzbot.com/products/flexystruder-tool-head

    (because business reasons)

    It prints Ninjaflex perfectly. Retraction and everything. I've mostly been printing flat things, so you can't really compare to the octopus.

    (Weirdly, I can't print pla on the lulzbot because it doesn't have a fan...)

    Anyway, settings used:

    230 degrees C

    .2mm layer height

    30mm/sec

    @Robert

    Amazing that your feeder design works so well. I mean, it's kind of overcoming a lot to push that elastic filament through the bowden.

    The Flexystruder from what I can tell is a modified Wade's extruder. Lulzbot has http://ohai-kit.alephobjects.com/project/flexystruder_assembly/ on making your own on their site.

    It looks like the main mod is a ptfe tube that holds the filament so the extruder bolt can gently push it along.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    @gadgetfreak: I think I may have jumped the gun on the twisting. There might be a slight bit of twisting happening but the bigger "problem" is my low friction spoolholder. Since the NinjaFlex doesn't really have a shape memory so it wants to be sort of straight that little bit of springiness is enough to make the reel unroll... I need to put a brake on it :D

    The frog was just over 5 meters of filament. It took 8+ hours to print.

    As for the settings, well, that's what the purpose of the test was, to try to get the stringing out of it. I increased both the retraction length and speed but in the end it seemed like going up in layer thickness had a bigger positive impact.

    Temperature wise it was tricky. 210C was much too cold and 235C with 0.2mm layers and 20mm/s speed was also a bit too cold, I had to drop the speed to 20mm/s to get proper bonding and get rid of underextrusion.

    @rhymeandreason: Thanks and yes, it's asking a lot considering how stretchy and soft this stuff is. There's a loot of bowden for it to move around in. Having the feeder/extruder as one unit like Lulzbot will work much better I'm sure. But it's nice to have the option to print this stuff even with a bowden setup.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    BTW, what about Filaflex.... it seems a very good product. Anybody is using it?

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    BTW, what about Filaflex.... it seems a very good product. Anybody is using it?

     

    I tried it and even though I thought, I found the right settings, I still have issues. Mostly that the print is lifting off the bed after a couple of hours. So still need time to experiment a bit with it....but no real idea how to start...

    Nersrac

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Flexible Filaments comparison

    I tried it and even though I thought, I found the right settings, I still have issues. Mostly that the print is lifting off the bed after a couple of hours. So still need time to experiment a bit with it....but no real idea how to start...

    Nersrac

     

    I think I am going to try it... in youtube videos seems far better... who knows...

    can you share your settings? Thanks

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...