GregValiant 1,409
Along with all the support - that model for most of it's height is a "U" shape. Those are always tough when it comes to travel moves.
In this one instance I think it's clear that given the model and settings, 4.13.1, Master, and 5.0 are pretty close. I can see where with certain models and combinations of settings that those times could change dramatically.
As @nallath has said more than once - the main issue is the acceleration settings. A user can ask Cura for an acceleration of 2000 but in their printer M201 is set at a max X and Y acceleration of 500. The actual print time in that case is going to be a lot more than what Cura calculated. Kind of a garbage-in-garbage-out-thing.
Recommended Posts
Top Posters In This Topic
28
26
25
12
Popular Days
Apr 27
20
Apr 26
17
May 2
16
Apr 22
15
Top Posters In This Topic
ahoeben 28 posts
nallath 26 posts
GregValiant 25 posts
Lupus52 12 posts
Popular Days
Apr 27 2022
20 posts
Apr 26 2022
17 posts
May 2 2022
16 posts
Apr 22 2022
15 posts
Popular Posts
ahoeben
@Lupus52, it is a bit like Ultimaker is having a party, and everyone is invited. Your printer manufacturer is also giving a party, but they did not want to spend money on cake. So they tell their gues
fvrmr
Hi everybody, Today we release the Ultimaker Cura 5.0 beta. After multiple special beta releases to test the Arachne Engine, the new slicing Engine is finally here. This new engine uses va
ahoeben
Fixed that for you here: https://github.com/Ultimaker/Uranium/pull/811
Posted Images
Cuq 206
Thanks for your file @GregValiant that's what I was thinking in 4.13 Fill Gaps Between Walls was on. it's the main difference but if you don't use it :
Cura 4.13 : 3:50
Cura Master : 3:46 ( The cura Master is a little bit better on displacement optimisation)
Cura 5.0 : 3:50
Link to post
Share on other sites