Jump to content

Fill patterns don't support structure above.


manisland

Recommended Posts

Posted · Fill patterns don't support structure above.

If I have a fill (eg line) with a high density, say line spacing of 3mm, then when it gets to a ceiling of the structure, the lines there have pretty good support.

Or near walls.

 

But say I have a 5mm thick plank, with a letter sitting on top of that, or a cube, etc.

There are corners created where the letters are, and there is no support for those.

If I want a a line spacing of say 10mm to speed up the print, disaster.

The ceiling has interruptions (corners) for where the letter walls, and the letter fill is going to go.

 

i.e. when an object is printed on top of a fill pattern, there may or may not be good support for those corners. They may be just hanging in air, especially if the fill below is loose for speed considerations.

 

The included picture shows that corner hanging in air. That is with 5mm infill distance.

 

There is a trick here somewhere, I would love to know it.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

935021245_ScreenShot2022-08-01at10_48_53AM.thumb.png.b16f4b4e8abc67c2e539b16ff42febe4.png1443987461_ScreenShot2022-08-01at10_49_30AM.thumb.png.ee16205cf1d6ce6f11b5f727a62be13b.png

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Fill patterns don't support structure above.

    I've been studying this and came up with a solution that works for me.

    I'll post in case others can use it.

     

    First I used Support Blockers, along with all the gyrations required. Placement, sizing, using Per Mode, overlap, and selecting from the Infill menu Infill Line Distance.

    There are plenty of Youtube vids showing that.

    But I also found that Extra Infill Wall Count would put up a wall, just not in the perfect place....

    At least when using Grid as a fill pattern, it wants to make the Support Blocker larger than I asked for, I think because it wants an even number of grids.

    So the wall is further out than the structure I want to support.

    See picture.

     

    Perhaps if a different fill pattern is used, like concentric? or  ? then the infill wall would be where I wanted. I may try that at some point, but changing the fill pattern thru the Support Blocker routine is very tedius and lengthy, so maybe another time...

     

    on a 4:32hr project, the more dense fill count added just a few minutes, and the infill walls as shown added another 20 minutes.

     

    Meanwhile I would be very pleased if someone showed me better way, I'd love to hear it.

     

    It seems this is a fairly frequent situation, and something that many would like to see handled automatically by the software. Yes?

     

    1282594486_ScreenShot2022-08-02at10_52_10AM.thumb.png.f2547ae5d611a1ec80fbf8a2cb89c238.png

     

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Fill patterns don't support structure above.

    This is a popular thread isn't it? I feel lonely.

    Regardless:
    I have found another trick that works great and doesn't add significant time to the print.

    I now put a very thin (one layer or two) of support blocker in for the entire layer, instead of blocks under the required corners as I did above.

     

    If the normal fill has a line spacing for fill of 5mm, or 8 or whatever suits the situation, then I put one or two layers of support blocker across the entire design with 1 or 2mm line spacing.

    Then the print is only slowed down for one or two layers, and I can do it quickly since editing one monster all encompassing support blocker doesn't have to be carefully placed, and only one is required, rather than the method I posted above.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 9 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...