Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
mnis

Thinking about redesigning the side fan trays for UM2?

Recommended Posts

Thinking about redesigning the side fan trays for UM2? Has anyone already thought of an optimized fan plate, or even been a workable solution, so an optimized fan plate for single extrusion?

Almost all objects created with the UM2/UM1 who have some finer detail, have mostly one-sided distortion. On the example of the UM-Robot this can each recognize during the printing process very well already. The right arm and the ear are distorted compared with the left. I think advanced users know the problem already, so I think the photos to prove here are not required.

At the UM1 is regular only on the left side, a fan. And the UM2, the right fan is unfortunately too far away from the nozzle. I know the UM2 is prepared for dual extrusion, but the current fan arrangement seems disadvantageous and requires improvement.

Maybe you can somewhat reduce the deformations onto firmer settings, but I believe without changing the fan plate, it will not be enough.

Markus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i have.

Theoretically the first thing to do would be modifing the existing Nozzle shield so it would actually shield the nozzle from the Air that is meant to cool the extruded material. This would create more flexibility how to design the airflow thus creating the possiblity to bring it nearer to the extruded material improving the printing of overhangs and bridging.

Nozzleshield.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First design of the radial fan i will use together with this motor:

http://www.conrad.de/ce/de/product/229022/Motraxx-Elektromotor-X-Train-124-L-N-12-V-Leerlaufdrehzahl-229022?ref=list#download-dokumente

Design can be downloaded to look at here:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/90634021/35mm%20Radial%20Fan.STL

This design will be optimized for the UM2 since there are some space Problems with the sidepanels and the X/Y Stepper Motors as well as the Bed Plate with the Ultimaker² line on it. I will recommend probably to take off the X/Y Motors though.

Anyone up to supply me with a nozzleshield as it is specified in my previous post? Sadly i lack the material and especially the tools to do that thing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, thanks for the impressions from you Takei Naodar. :-P

I know I have opened this thread, but now suddenly the time I do not have to intensify. Hopefully it will be better next weekend. :oops:

Maybe someone still has a few good ideas.

I thought first of a two-part solution close to the original design and supported by the central hole in the plate between the two nozzle openings. Foldable aluminum sheet, but what thickness should it have at least?

I also thought of as a round air shower without the original fan plates, but I do not know the exact name for such a construction.

So much, at least for today.

Markus

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!