Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
schafe

I don't understand support distance z

Recommended Posts

I have not experimented with this much, but the description for the support distance z seems backwards to me. It says "A small gap here makes it easier to remove the support but makes the print a bit uglier." In my world it seems that changing from the default of .15 to .25 would create a bigger gap between the support and the intended layer. I thought this was a typo, but I just upgraded Cura and the description is the same. What am I missing?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is meant that a small gap is better than none at all.

Without gap the support material is attached to the object and difficult to remove, but the associated surfaces are overall better.

With gap the support material can be removed easily later, but are at a greater distance are nearby surfaces uglier.

Markus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a correct intrepretation and rewrite?

"A small gap here, compared to no gap, makes it easier to remove the support but makes the print a bit uglier."

 

I think this interpretation is correct. If you have the small gap, printed lines above the gap will hang down a bit and make the print looking uglier at this spot. The alternative would be to have no gap at all. Then you will have to cut the support away with a knife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next suspected:

I'm not sure if it's generally just a matter of making porous support material, so that it can be removed easily later.

In "Distance X / Y (mm)" Cura tries to bring the support material as close as possible to the walls, without touching the side walls completely. Within the support structure, the selected setting changes probably nothing, but I have not yet been observed.

For Distance Z (mm) there is also a little problem with gravity. So if I, for example, Want to create a top or bottom, then I need a very fine mesh support material in order to obtain smooth surfaces. A contact with the surface to be generated is not avoidable. Therefore, I think the distance Z (mm) is actually trying to create the individual Z-layers of support material porous, so patchy.

Markus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!