Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
inx

wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Recommended Posts

Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Hello.

Upgrading my ultimaker with a heated bed made me use branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade.

After some bad (z-compressed) prints i figured out the problem:

looking into Configuration.h where DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT is defined i find the following:

#define DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT {78.7402,78.7402,200.0,760*1.1}

steps per unit for z-axis: 200

while in branch "Marlin_v1" i find a different value for the z-axis:

200.0*8/3

which explains the "compressed" prints and my bent heated aluminium bed...

changing that value solved the problem.

The same value for the z-axis (200) is to find in branch Marlin_UM_Original_Plus.

is this intentional or just simply a mistake?

inx

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Did you upgrade with the UM made heated bed or a custom self built one? I believe the firmware you mentioned in git is for the UM made bed which comes with a different Z stepper and screw.

If you build a custom heated bed than you should know two things... The mm per steps is 200 * 8 / 3 because the UM original without the bed upgrade has a screw with a 3 mm pitch, a stepper with 200 steps per rev and it is run in 8 microstepping mode.

The second is that the UM made bed uses a PT100 temp sensor which your bed probably doesn't use. Flashing the UM firmware for the UM made bed onto a printer with a custom built bed and a different temp sensor causes problems in the firmware with MAXTEMP or MINTEMP errors and may make updating the firmware difficult.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Indeed i use a non UM heated bed unsing a temperature sensor with 100kOhm

Figuring out the Temperature sensor was quite straight forward and easy to find in the configuration file.

Why would a heated bed change the Z stepping resolution? Well, maybe UMs heated bed comes with a new rod... i dont know.

anyway, i think at least some comments in Configuration.h would nice to avoid that people use wrong values for the z-axis.

a wrong value there can harm the machine...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Yes indeed, UM Heated bed kit comes with a new Z axis, just as the UMO+

The Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade branch is for the official UM kit.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Well, i think the title of this post should be rephrased:

"Attention when using branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade for custom heated bed"

Nevertheless i think it would be a good idea to have some explicit comments about the values for DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in Configuration.h

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

Hello Guys!

I have a UMO and the new heated bed kit by ultimaker. I usually compile my own custom version of Marlin.

There are a few things I would like to confirm:

- the temperature sensor should be set to \\20 is the PT100 circuit found in the Ultimainboard V2.x

- the steps per unit should be 200 and the microsteps should be set to 1/8

Thanks in Advance,

Antonio

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted · wrong DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT in branch Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade

You only have to change the steps, the temperature sensor is not changed with the kit. You only get a PT100 with the UMO+.

The official firmware for the UMO+HBK is https://github.com/Ultimaker/Marlin/tree/Marlin_UM_HeatedBedUpgrade, you can compare in GitHub the changes from the https://github.com/Ultimaker/Marlin/tree/Marlin_v1.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura 4.0 | Stable available!
      Ultimaker Cura 4.0 is mainly focused on the improved user interface and cloud integration.
      As always, we want to collect your user feedback for this release. If there are any improvements you can think of, feel free to mention it here and help us to shape the next release.
      • 23 replies
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!