Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
entomophile

Difference between "bottom/top thickness" and "initial layer thickness"?

Recommended Posts

Initial layer thickness overrides your layer height thickness for the first layer - say your layer height thickness is 0.1 but your initial layer thickness is 0.3 then the base layer is put down with a bit more splodge to get it to stick well.

Bottom layer thickness and top layer thickness are the number of layers put down before you get to your 'fill' variable - and this is important. Let's say you use 10% infill - it is obvious with your .1 layer height there would barely be any material covering over the top of your infill matrix.

So if you want 10 layers at the bottom of your part - then with the .3 setting it will put a first layer of your bottom layer down a bit thicker to hold the part, and then complete the 7 other layers to give you 1mm (I think that it right and that the base layer would not be 1.2mm but don't know that for sure.)

Hope that is clearer :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if you want 10 layers at the bottom of your part - then with the .3 setting it will put a first layer of your bottom layer down a bit thicker to hold the part, and then complete the 7 other layers to give you 1mm (I think that it right and that the base layer would not be 1.2mm but don't know that for sure.)

 

Actually, no... it should give you 0.3 + (7 x 0.1), I agree, but it doesn't. The number of solid layers on the bottom doesn't take into account the first layer thickness. So you get 0.3 + (9 x 0.1) instead.

Well, actually, no, you get 0.3 + (10 x 0.1) because there's another bug that you always seem to get one more top/bottom layer than you should.

I filed a bug report against CuraEngine for both these things a few days ago.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!