Jump to content

A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

Well, I have tried again with the new design. The head and assembly all works well, but i''m still having problems with the e3d v6 getting blocked after a couple of layers. I thing there may be a problem with the heat breaks, as machining marks are clearly visible inside. My theory is that the filament is getting caught on one of these. Its a concern particularly if the parked head is going to be left for a while with not extrusion...the filament sat in the heat break may soften and cause a blockage on the next extrusion attempt.

So, i've emailed e3d with the problem, will see what they come back with.

The progress I did make however, was to make the print head swap very easy. All wires are now on plugs, so swapping to the experimental setup takes a matter of minutes rather than hours now.

Good work on the development guys. I really like the way you have attached the tool storage piece to the frame neotko...I may just have to 'borrow' that idea!

Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    • Replies 1.3k
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted Images

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    GroenHart.thumb.jpg.563bccc34ceeea64a1e0b13a7cf2823d.jpg

    About the overlap in materials, for this one I set an overlap of 0.25 mm in CAD which gives a nice strong bond, but also causes a little smearing of the green into the white, best seen around the ears. I'll try a few more probably around 0.1 / 0.15 mm.

    GroenHart.thumb.jpg.563bccc34ceeea64a1e0b13a7cf2823d.jpg

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    I'm still there watching ;-)

    Didn't made so many posts recently cause I've been thinking about how to get the most out of this idea.

    corexy.thumb.jpg.d5630ec18b904eb54e6444a0b5f9e82c.jpg

    corexy.thumb.jpg.d5630ec18b904eb54e6444a0b5f9e82c.jpg

    • Like 2
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Yeah, thinking about how to move on myself, wonder what rails are used in the BCN sigma, think a rail in the middle of the H make's more sense than rods. I'll probably someday start building a complete machine, most likely from aluminium extrusion, maybe after the summer.

    Parking heads at the front (with extruders at the back) will not work with larger numbers as the bowdens will be blocking each other. Parking at the back needs a much better type of docking unit as in mine the head will not stay in place with the amount of pressure on the bowden you 'll have at the back. Already now tweaking the bowdenpressure (curvature) needs to be precise (I can do it by adjusting the angle of the feeder on the railsystem)

    Personally atm I'm more interested in improving the reliability with 2 heads than moving to more heads. I think a machine with heads on a rails is probably more reliable than loose docking stations but both the Orcabot and the BCN Sigma need to move a lot of mass around. Although I don't like a moving buildplate, the idea of the Orcabot should be easy to expand to 4 heads (2 per rails, from 2 sides)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Umm just a crazy idea. What if instead of changing the head we could change the bowden. Retract. Load other tube with magnets 3kilo force should be enough for a tight fix. This way the 1 head moves to the bowden clamp it and extrude to clean. Ofc it's a lot of wasted material... Just thinking out loud.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    @neotko: You would have to retract, then wait until the filament is cooled down enough and then exchange the Bowden. If you don't wait long enough before removing the filament from the printhead you get an ugly clog. There are quite a few examples here on the forum where people used to large retraction distance and got clogs.

    And this will take too long for being attractive.

    @foehnsturm: After tangled filament comes tangled Bowden tubes... ;) It might work if the Bowden tubes come from a spot above the printer; a revolver system could be even used there.

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Well, I already made some decisions:

    1,75 mm filament, linear rails, direct extruders, ...

    I'll start with 2 or 3 tool heads. With 1.75 mm filament and without bowden tubes I'm quite confident to find a way to avoid tangling. While other parts are close to a final design, the "wires" and "tubes" are only for illustration.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

     

    @foehnsturm good luck, as always curious to see what you come up with, specially curious to see the rail gantry and which rail you'll use...

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    @ultiarjan Thanks! Some parts are already ordered but t'll take considerable time until something will be assembled. I went for Misumi Miniature Linear Guides and a corexy gantry.

    corey-top.thumb.jpg.3c9c6813f12228078b290002eb5dd637.jpg

    corey-top.thumb.jpg.3c9c6813f12228078b290002eb5dd637.jpg

    • Like 2
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Already know how to power four extruders?

    I've been working on the electronics platform to do this for quite some time now :p

    /edit:

    I thought about using some relays to switch between different motors on one stepper driver. But there are a few problems with that. For one, you'll lose control over the disconnected stepper motor (maybe lose tension on the filament in the process...).

    This might be overcome by shorting the coils of disconnected motors together. But I doubt that would work for longer periods of time.

    My conclusion was that I want an actual 8-driver electronics platform (for 5 extruders). You can expect news from that project soon. Schematics are pretty much done, and I'm working on completing the PCB layout now.

    Edited by Guest
    • Like 2
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    A smoothieboard 5x has enough thermistor inputs and MOSFETs for 3 extruders and a heated bed. There are 5 stepper drivers but also a bunch of unused pins broken out. So, one or two external stepper drivers should be feasible.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Well, after almost 1 month the company that I use for the laser parts returned me the pieces because they where not able to 'bend' it. I also tried to find other companies that bend metal and they all say (15 different) that the piece it's too small to make the bends. So... I just did it by myself. Bough a mini anvil, a 1 kilo hammer and with some tricks (I had to use a metal from Ikea I had laying around for the inner zone) now I have 2 (and 5 spare metals to make more) for my 30x30x10 x4 fans setup. Now I need to design a middle part to connect it (piece of cake) and do a few drill holes.

    IMG_5338.thumb.JPG.cbacb72c2b9cabf0f88b79bdbe4caa13.JPG

    IMG_5337.thumb.JPG.9ba8ddce8d91d4f89335afa30873fbf8.JPG

    Also, interesting. I had to take out one of the hotends because the peek was broken (it broke months ago when I had to take it out from the original aluminium holder) and two days ago it started leaking because the crack was too severe. But the interesting think it's that I had the chance to check if the hot from all this weeks printing did or didn't deform the pla. And as you can see on the photos it's flawless, not even a bit of heat deformation. So the basic design with the heatbreak film works like a charm.

    IMG_5324.thumb.JPG.f1316bf94556623028afb27c459c9087.JPG

    IMG_5326.thumb.JPG.bb0c5333b3fd903c8799a39e79994b29.JPG

    IMG_5338.thumb.JPG.cbacb72c2b9cabf0f88b79bdbe4caa13.JPG

    IMG_5337.thumb.JPG.9ba8ddce8d91d4f89335afa30873fbf8.JPG

    IMG_5324.thumb.JPG.f1316bf94556623028afb27c459c9087.JPG

    IMG_5326.thumb.JPG.bb0c5333b3fd903c8799a39e79994b29.JPG

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    prototyping a magnetic head for the E3Dv6, thinking of using a UM2 fanshrout symetricaly by just drilling a nozzle hole in the middle ...

    E3Dv6-magnetic.thumb.jpg.da026c5b3eee39aa2a66ce8d78f1b285.jpg

    E3Dv6-magnetic.thumb.jpg.da026c5b3eee39aa2a66ce8d78f1b285.jpg

    • Like 3
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    mounted a fitting prototype, including nice (almost) symmetrical fans, but before my first print the thing clogged big-time, no time to fix it now :( first print will have to wait ...

    E3Dproto.thumb.jpg.bf6c175aaef777487ef3c24104398f08.jpg

    I think the bowden was not in deep enough...

    E3Dproto.thumb.jpg.bf6c175aaef777487ef3c24104398f08.jpg

    Edited by Guest
    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Did it form a 'bulb', in the heat break?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    I have no idea, the PLA is not moving in eater direction anymore ... any solutions?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Just a wild idea. Maybe the e3d head needs the air of the dissipated faster with no obstacles like the cables reflecting airflow?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    I was already thinking the same.... now the find a good solution...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    You can easily check if the E3D hotend fan works well enough. If you touch the large heatsink, it has to be cool. Even at the lowest fin. I remember someone saying that even if it feels "just a little warm", you will get clogs.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    hmm, have to remove the wires than for sure..... it was a little warm at the bottom...

    now I still need to find out how to unblock it:)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    update version3 available for simplify3D ....

     

    Optimized Dual Extrusion

    Create stunning dual-color parts with Simplify3D’s Dual Extrusion Wizard. Unique features prevent filament from oozing on your print, resulting in crisp, sharp definition between colors.

    Streamline the setup of dual-extrusion print jobs.

    Protect your part from blobs and defects using the Ooze Shield and Prime Pillar.

    Print the part in one material and the support structures in another, allowing you to use dissolvable filament.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    You beat me to post that! Soo niceee

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Yeah... like to try but my 2th nozzle is blocked :) no time for this now.... will have to wait.... love to see your results...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...