Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer


Recommended Posts

Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

No news? houlàlà, I saw a print made by conny_G, is that some results?

 

Yes, it's my first "perfect" print, the third or fourth iteration on the 3D Benchy. Found out that my issues with that actually wasn't the calibration (as I though initially), but the print temperature of the magenta PLA...

For me the core issue is currently is that the docking process is not completely reproducibly stable yet - the head can tilt by 1-2mm in the dock. For me 100 picks-ups of the second head work, 1 doesn't. Curious how the new version of the dock will work that I just printed.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    • Replies 1.3k
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted Images

    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

     

    No news? houlàlà, I saw a print made by conny_G, is that some results?

     

    Yes, it's my first "perfect" print, the third or fourth iteration on the 3D Benchy. Found out that my issues with that actually wasn't the calibration (as I though initially), but the print temperature of the magenta PLA...

    For me the core issue is currently is that the docking process is not completely reproducibly stable yet - the head can tilt by 1-2mm in the dock. For me 100 picks-ups of the second head work, 1 doesn't. Curious how the new version of the dock will work that I just printed.

     

    very exciting, I hope the new design works better. Great work, thank you for the news!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

     

    Beta testing update

    The first tool changer upgrades are running.

    We already changed two things. First, there is an alternative, super rigid dock version. Due to some manufacturing tolerances with the UM2 frame panels (e.g. thickness 6.0 mm vs 6.1 mm) the first version's click-on mount may not fit tight enough on every printer. Second, I added a small "life-saver" device, providing an additional mechanical interlock when picking up the head.

     

    Moving ahead

    I don't know your plans for the upcoming holidays and the first beta round isn't finished yet. But if some of those who showed interest on the doodle poll intend to use some free time to work on this at the turn of the year please send me a message. I'll update the documentation soon, so there should be an opportunity to join.

    • Like 3
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

     

    Beta testing update

    The first tool changer upgrades are running.

    We already changed two things. First, there is an alternative, super rigid dock version. Due to some manufacturing tolerances with the UM2 frame panels (e.g. thickness 6.0 mm vs 6.1 mm) the first version's click-on mount may not fit tight enough on every printer. Second, I added a small "life-saver" device, providing an additional mechanical interlock when picking up the head.

     

    Moving ahead

    I don't know your plans for the upcoming holidays and the first beta round isn't finished yet. But if some of those who showed interest on the doodle poll intend to use some free time to work on this at the turn of the year please send me a message. I'll update the documentation soon, so there should be an opportunity to join.

     

    I'm on holidays from the 25 december up to the 8 january and I stay home most of the time. If I can help, let me know.

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    With this 8h overnight print I tested the effect of the "live-saver device" that @foehnsturm has created yesterday. No fail in the docking process. For me that was the break-through to a new level of reliability. Now it needs to be stress tested for a while.

    fullsizeoutput_dc7.thumb.jpeg.3ad1b7e0fe395933a02bcca67a175c7b.jpeg

    fullsizeoutput_dc7.thumb.jpeg.3ad1b7e0fe395933a02bcca67a175c7b.jpeg

    • Like 3
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Imperial sized magnets would work as long as their holding force is in the range of 900 gr. But we would have to modiy the couplings to accomodate the larger diameter. The small difference in height shouldn't be an issue.

     

    I just saw this paragraph! I missed it first time. D'oh!

    If the magnets are press-fit, then the difference between 6.0 (+/- 0.1) and 6.35 (+/-) is huge. In which case I would suggest having version that accommodate North American people. If it is hard to locally get metric magnets in Canada, which is officially a metric country, just think of how difficult it would be for Americans. :) Then again, they have more scientists, so who knows, but still...

    If the magnets are glue-on, then designing for imperial would cover all bases, I would imagine.

    @SyntaxTerror has offered to hook me up, which is great, but I would still advocate for supporting imperial magnets just for ease of purchase worldwide.

    Just my $0.02.

    Thanks very much!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    WOW    !!!!!  

    first print as part of the beta....

    needs a bit more calibration, and a bit less temperate.... but looking damn good for a first print....

    2plus.thumb.png.5b159db2ad189edc78f4b0767b6d80da.png

     

    I can see a ghost image of a calibration pattern in that photo!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Minimum orders being what they are, I have overflow. If you want, I could send you a set?

     

    Hi @SyntaxTerror,

    (I love your handle, BTW!)

    I am interested in taking you up on your offer. I will PM you and we can hammer out the details.

    Thanks very much! You are very kind! :)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

     

    Minimum orders being what they are, I have overflow. If you want, I could send you a set?

     

    Hi @SyntaxTerror,

    (I love your handle, BTW!)

    I am interested in taking you up on your offer.  I will PM you and we can hammer out the details.

    Thanks very much!  You are very kind! :)

     

    Ah, no worries. I'd love to see a video of my face as I was trying to place the order. First I put 12 in the cart. Multiples of 10 only, it said. Fine, 8 more in. Then I ran into the minimum order amount. Fine, I did a quick calculation and learned I needed 50. So 30 more in the cart. Then because of the amount of magnets, it gave me a discount that put me below the minimum again. In any case, now I have enough magnets to do this thing to 10 printers.

    Edited by Guest
    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Ah, no worries. I'd love to see a video of my face as I was trying to place the order. First I put 12 in the cart. Multiples of 10 only, it said. Fine, 8 more in. Then I ran into the minimum order amount. Fine, I did a quick calculation and learned I needed 50. So 30 more in the cart. Then because of the amount of magnets, it gave me a discount that put me below the minimum again. In any case, now I have enough magnets to do this thing to 10 printers.

     

    You know, I have seen some nice magnet-based project on Thingiverse and YouMagine. Maybe it's time to make some magnetic (and dual-printed) gifts for family and friends! :D

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

     

     

    Minimum orders being what they are, I have overflow. If you want, I could send you a set?

     

    Hi @SyntaxTerror,

    (I love your handle, BTW!)

    I am interested in taking you up on your offer.  I will PM you and we can hammer out the details.

    Thanks very much!  You are very kind! :)

     

    Ah, no worries. I'd love to see a video of my face as I was trying to place the order. First I put 12 in the cart. Multiples of 10 only, it said. Fine, 8 more in. Then I ran into the minimum order amount. Fine, I did a quick calculation and learned I needed 50. So 30 more in the cart. Then because of the amount of magnets, it gave me a discount that put me below the minimum again. In any case, now I have enough magnets to do this thing to 10 printers.

     

    LOL!!!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Ultiarjan

    could you tell me what the test file was ?? is it a Thingyvers file??

    Thank you

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Thanks very Much will try it 8)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Finally I replaced my TFT couplers, now back to printing

    50% size, 11 hrs printing

    gyro-dodo.thumb.jpg.cb624c58fd77341814308fcbfc46a2d9.jpg

    gyro-dodo.thumb.jpg.cb624c58fd77341814308fcbfc46a2d9.jpg

    • Like 6
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    And one of my first very good prints with the tool changer

    IMG_20161214_212223.thumb.jpg.a81f3d42552be27b2c4c98caec9ecf2e.jpg

    Really nice results, still needed some fine tuning on the calibration but very happy for the moment

    IMG_20161214_212223.thumb.jpg.a81f3d42552be27b2c4c98caec9ecf2e.jpg

    • Like 4
    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    And one of my first very good prints with the tool changer

    IMG_20161214_212223.thumb.jpg.a81f3d42552be27b2c4c98caec9ecf2e.jpg

    Really nice results, still needed some fine tuning on the calibration but very happy for the moment

     

    is it so difficult to tune? this print is really nice! you're a lucky man to be part of the testers...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Finally I replaced my TFT couplers, now back to printing

    50% size, 11 hrs printing

    gyro-dodo.thumb.jpg.cb624c58fd77341814308fcbfc46a2d9.jpg

     

    Hi foehnsturm,

    Looks excellent!

    So I guess this means you have PVA working and adhering successfully. And tips for PVA on the UM2(+) (i.e. *not* UM3)?

    Thanks. :)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted (edited) · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    Well honestly, PVA on PLA without any help is still kind of an issue no matter what machine. The "secret" is to have either large flat top PLA surfaces for the PVA (obviously not the case here) or an  interconnecting PVA structure ("horizontal expansion" in Cura) so that the PVA on top of the PLA doesn't form an island. Ofc there are still geometries where this is difficult/impossible to achieve.

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    And 'nozzle wise' I guess a 3Dsolex Jet nozzle has more resemblance with a BB core than f.e. an E3D nozzle.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Posted · A different multi-extrusion approach - UM tool / printhead changer

    That's kinda funny. My impression is that @swordriff 3dsolex 0.4 mm works better for PVA than a standard nozzle. Most likely the internal, two-channel geometry helps to prevent agglomeration of burnt PVA in some way.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

    • 23 Visiting our virtual showroom

      1. 1. Have you visited our virtual showroom before?


        • Yes
        • No
      2. 2. If yes - what content did you find most interesting?


        • Information about Ultimaker ecosystem
        • Applications & application stories
        • Customer success stories
        • Webinar sessions
        • Material wall & ecosystem partners
        • New product introduction; software subscription plans
      3. 3. What of the below would make you consider visiting (again)?


        • New Live Ultimaker Webinar streams
        • ‘Ask Me Anything’ with industry experts or Ultimaker staff via main stage and public chat
        • New customer success stories
        • New applications
        • Presentations/news from ecosystem partners
        • Opportunity to meet representatives for an interactive tour
        • Helpful videos like Software tutorials
        • Other; leave input in a comment below!

    • Our picks

      • Ultimaker turns 10: A look back
        Ultimaker is turning 10 years old and that means it is story telling time! We'll explore 2010-2014, traveling through the evolution of the business from the Protobox and Ultimaker Original, to the major leaps forward with the Ultimaker 2 and Ultimaker 3.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Transformation Summit
        Visit our virtual showroom and learn more about the Ultimaker ecosystem!
        • 14 replies
      • New here? Register your Ultimaker for free 3D printer onboarding course
        Hi,
         
        Often getting started is the most difficult part of any process. A good start sets you up for success and saves you time and energy that could be spent elsewhere. That is why we have a onboarding course ready for
        Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle, Ultimaker S5, Ultimaker S3 Ultimaker 2+ Connect.   
        They're ready for you on the Ultimaker Academy platform. All you need to do to gain access is to register your product to gain free access. 
        Ready? Register your product here in just 60 seconds.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...