Jump to content

Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)


hp-65

Recommended Posts

Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

I printed this with my standard settings for "functional prints",

0.2mm layer height, 65mm/s and 85mm/s for the infill (set to 50%).

Width of the object is 30mm.

UM2 with Cura 15.02.1

(Just noticed that the back looks even worse.)

I must admit that this is one of the worst prints that has ever

left my UM2's printing bed...

During the print (at ~30%), I even reduced the speed down

to 50%, resulting in less than 35mm/s (45mm/s), but as you can

see, that did not improve anything.

Reminds me a little of my post from 6/2013, which compared

13.02 with 13.06.3.

1303vs13063 1

 

Now, how do your prints look like with newer Cura versions?

What are your settings?

I have some Slic3r and Kisslicer setups for my UM1 and other

printers, but I'm too lazy to do the same for the UM2 (now).

Would anyone of you might sharing your settings/setups for

these?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

Damn i never got weird stuff like that even with the bad curas, i guess it must be something to do with the infill speeds being different or something . even at 70mm/s i have clean prints? not sure. i just use mostly default settings and touchwod, ive neverr have many problems. I think the problems arise when you start messing with too many setting that you dont really know what the variables do. These are my settings at the mo for high rez stuff i dont touch anything else.

Screen_Shot_2015_04_06_at_17_18_55.png

image free hosting

 

Screen_Shot_2015_04_06_at_17_18_49.png

but i would manually set the temp to 230 during printing as 210 is too low for my pla to squeeze through at 0.2

 

upload image online

 

Screen_Shot_2015_04_06_at_17_21_14.png

upload pictures free

 

I would also normally set the infill to 20 or 30.

 

A lot of people mess with the setting obsessively but i found that there is no need, there are going to be lines, and it will not be perfect as you very well know, but as long as it looks like the printer has not seriously gone wrong during the print im happy. Those who seek perfection should look at post methods rather than endless fruitless tweaking they fool themselves into thinking they are actually making improvements. I speak of course for UM2 as that is what i have experience in. Temp and speed are the ONLY settings which you actually need to play with ignore everything else. Also remember the thickness of your nozzle being relative as well, i e. .4, .8, 1.2.... thats it. some appropriate glue as well (for pla that is), and a clean nozzle. lol.

 

P.S. i preffer a 1.2 thicker wall as it generally makes the model MUCH sturdier and not to delicate feeling.

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    Hi Cloakfiend, if you have to run .200 at 50mm/s with a temp of 230 then you have a have a fault with your printer, or a setting wrong. I can run .300 at 60mm/s with 220 max, from memory I think probably 215 with most filaments. If you search the net you will find that manufacturers give a PLA temp range and I think none exceed 220c.

    Oh and a lot of us seek perfection rather than average which is why we change our settings e.g. try getting a decent overhang with a speed of 50mm/s :)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    • 3 weeks later...
    • 4 weeks later...
    Posted (edited) · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    Same here. Infills and surface are looking like crap. UM2, 15.02.1 Cura & FW. I have to lower speed dramatically to get nearly as good results as with older versions.

    P5215608.thumb.JPG.adcc050455d6de78e3e4026687dea17b.JPG

    What's the problem? Maybe the "Improved handling of large 3D models"?

    For me speed doesn't really matter. I try to reach best possible Quality. Most of the time on small parts around 2 cm^3.

    And another bad thing: On my first "huge" printjob 10x10x10cm cura 15.02.1 start printig on the inner brim and lay down the first starting filament output wire under the final surface. Very bad, too.

    5a330e0169338_Bildschirmfoto2015-05-21um12_42_26.thumb.png.739921763b45a5fb351fe5d5666ad9ab.png

    I think, I reinstall old FW.

    BTW: After resetting Ultimaker2 it comes up with the "First time startup". Is there a way to abort this because I have already filament inserted?

    P5215608.thumb.JPG.adcc050455d6de78e3e4026687dea17b.JPG

    5a330e0169338_Bildschirmfoto2015-05-21um12_42_26.thumb.png.739921763b45a5fb351fe5d5666ad9ab.png

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    I think you can abort or cancel the wizard.

    To me this doesn't come from the firmware but more from the slicer. I have the 15.02 firmware but i use Cura 14.12 i think.

    Cura 15 has some quality problems with layer heights greater than .2mm if i remember well due to infill being printed before the outer shells. These quality problems don't show up with lower layer heights

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)
    I think you can abort or cancel the wizard.

    To me this doesn't come from the firmware but more from the slicer. I have the 15.02 firmware but i use Cura 14.12 i think.

    Cura 15 has some quality problems with layer heights greater than .2mm if i remember well due to infill being printed before the outer shells. These quality problems don't show up with lower layer heights

    Maybe I can rotate the knob to switch between continue and chancel? I've never tried... ;-)

    I print only between 0.06mm and 0.1mm. But I think I also go back to cura 14.12.

    Most of my prints are small as these knobs or gears: P5075341.thumb.jpeg.f9988a831d5fc644671f205713817b8d.jpeg carson.thumb.jpeg.560eeef70d622f0bbd4628fc288f9cc3.jpeg

    P5075341.thumb.jpeg.f9988a831d5fc644671f205713817b8d.jpeg

    carson.thumb.jpeg.560eeef70d622f0bbd4628fc288f9cc3.jpeg

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    I agree the old CURA infill was better, but seeing as i never use infill anymore, i dont mind. I just tick support material, and it kinda serves the same purpose but uses less material and is great for what i need.

    @yellowshark, i also seek perfection (and achieve it to some extend), but my perfection comes after some post work and painting (not very much BTW). And I personally hate the plastic look finishes now, everything looks the same in plastic, at least with faux metal effects and other experimentation nothing ever looks the same.

    An unpainted model to me is an unfinished model (like a statue or something not engineering related). Like buying an air-fix model and not painting it. Or designing a 3D model and not texturing it, or anything. It looks like a toy, i just want it to look amazing. Even though it is simply amazing for being made the way it was anyway, and for even existing.

    Edited by Guest
    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    maybe you could check your speed settings in the advanced tab, and setting all these to zero. When everything is printed at the same speed the result is more uniform, especially the infill.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    @ cloakfiend: Nice idea I definitely try with support instead of infill. Thanks

    @ peggyb: I'm not shure but I'll give it a try. Thanks

    But starting inside the inner brim is a no go for my "huge" project.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

     

    @wattsekunde support doesn't generate if you close your model, so model it hollow (i.e. with a shell) or punch a hole in it somewhere during the modelling stage, then tick the support everywhere option. otherwise it will just print a hollow model without the support inside.

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    I have been using cura 15.01 since January and it works fine for me. Please post *all* your settings. Easiest to do a "file -> save profile" and post the ini file result. There are all kinds of things that if you mess with the quality is destroyed.

    Or you can reset to default settings, then do .8mm shell (to get 2 passes) 20% infill (no more than that!) and print nice and slow for good quality - what's the rush? Try 35mm/sec for all speeds both infill and shell.

    Bones are hollow with very little infill and they are strong. Your parts shouldn't need much infill either.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    Most parts dont need any infill, I print at 35mm/s for 0.06 and 50mm/s for 0.1. These are good speeds in my opinion.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)
    Hi Cloakfiend, if you have to run .200 at 50mm/s with a temp of 230 then you have a have a fault with your printer, or a setting wrong. I can run .300 at 60mm/s with 220 max, from memory I think probably 215 with most filaments. If you search the net you will find that manufacturers give a PLA temp range and I think none exceed 220c.

    Oh and a lot of us seek perfection rather than average which is why we change our settings e.g. try getting a decent overhang with a speed of 50mm/s :)

    Sorry for getting back late on this, but UM PLA states 190-260 for the Temps. And even if there is something wrong with my printer, i dont mind, as long as i keep getting perfect layer height.

    20150522_161022.thumb.jpg.c298c22291948b70bf9f3ccb3baf76d9.jpg

    20150522_161022.thumb.jpg.c298c22291948b70bf9f3ccb3baf76d9.jpg

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    I was locked out of the forum since it was revamped >:-/

    The printing quality slightly improved after setting infill

    speed to 0, but everything still looked ugly.

    Until 15.02.1, I ran my UM2 with an older, modded FW, but

    upgraded to the HEX blob that was included in the new Cura

    distribution.

    Did the default acceleration settings change?

    A few days ago, I cleaned the nozzle (90°C pull), but also

    changed the layer height to 0.1mm for the prints I did so far.

    It looks better now, but still need to test with 0.2mm height.

    Clearly, there HAS to be reason for this.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Terrible Print Quality (15.02.1, UM2)

    Not sure about all those mods, but I pull when it hits 85, this way I only really ever need one or two pulls. works for me with bog standard PLA filaments. sometimes I get distracted though and forget to look at the temp going down and it goes below 85 which either means it snaps or feels too tight to pull out so I have to start over.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...