two-mountains
-
Posts
9 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
3D Prints
Posts posted by two-mountains
-
-
i have to use a raft as i damaged the magnetic bed
and I find my filament does better at 205-210*
otherwise this is all the recommended settings
-
could this be the cause of the spotty print (i don't really know what to call it) gonna try a simple settings benchie to see if it was something i did
-
well the walls are adhering but now it seems to be pulsing on the extrusion, there are visible points moving diagonal along the print connected by stringing I included the Cura file used on the latest problem i believe that this is now an exageration of the lines seen in the piece to the left due to the increase in steps per mm
CE5_Part Studio 1 - sight tube.3mf
tia
ps greg that sounds like it could well be as the silent motherboard is part of the upgrade in the 5 pro over the 5
-
walls are certainly thicker now but need to do a few more tries to be certain
-
not sure doing a print right now,
it was extruding 100mm when i asked for 100mm
-
ok so this is crazy the original setting was 93 steps/mm using the info from this article: 3D Printer E-step Calibration (Step-by-Step Guide) – 3dprintscape.com I changed that to 243.3 steps/mm
-
1
-
-
ok looked into and will try recalibrating the e-step
-
I'm using cura 5.2.1 with my ender 5 pro and have had problems with the walls not adhering to each other using pla at a temperature of 210*C, layer height .12-.2, bed temp 50, fan speed 100%, wall flow speed: I have tried between 100 and 120% the last picture was 1wall and 100% infill and the walls don't mesh with the infill
wall problems
in What have you made
Posted
so I did the benchy and it turned out fine so i did a the other print(same file) and resulted in a good print. I quite it early as that piece has some incorrect dimensions but it seems to be good print wise, it also isn't having any of the poorer laminations i was also experiencing before. Will be keeping an eye on it to make sure the motherboard doesn't revert to the problem like in Gregg's case