sekisback
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
3D Prints
Posts posted by sekisback
-
-
@ ahoeben,
thx for you quick answer, damm you are right I dint checked that. I was the meaning that the file will be stored as gcode. Made my day
- 1
-
Morning is it possible to change the format from gcode to ufp by default?
I have an Ender3 Profile in Cura 4.7.1 with octoprint connection and it works like a charm. Now I added the CuraThumbnails Plugin to Octoprint to see the thumbnail form the ufp file.
I can slice and use save as *.ufp, than i have to transfer the file to octoprint manualy, so this works.
I found under PrinterSettings that i can change the G-Code-Var. In my case by default "Marlin", I changed this to Ultimaker2 without effect.
I dont know where to change the export format to ufp to send the file as ufp directly to the printer via cura octoprint plugin
different behavior if cura 5.1.0 started direct from appimage or gnome menu / cli Linux
in UltiMaker.com
Posted
no big deal, but i am searching for a solution.
I have a different behavior from cura if i start cura by double clicking the AppImage (everything is like expected)
or if i start cura from command line by using /usr/bin/cura or /opt/cura/Ultimaker-Cura-5.1.0-linux.AppImage
In the second case it seams for me, that the screenresolution is different or maybe the fonts are bigger
I tried this also with cura 5.0, in cura 5.0 is no different in the display behavior, never mind which start version i choose.
Did someone know this behavior.
Using debian.
Maybe there is something missing, if i use the cli to start cura 5.1.0 i got this output
with cura 5.0 i got this output
qt.qml.context: file:///tmp/.mount_UltimajP6F5L/share/cura/resources/qml/Settings/SettingView.qml:427:16 Parameter "index" is not declared. Injection of parameters into signal handlers is deprecated. Use JavaScript functions with formal parameters instead.