[Surface Mode: 'Surface'/'Both' inner supports...]

On 2/15/2021 at 10:24 PM, rc-pilot said:

Meant to say that the area to be infilled where you said to use diagonal for strength the ones in the pictures were test prints and I just used a 3 % infill. My reckoning was any type of infill to try get it to all work together. 
 

many thanks again Frank 

 

Update still have small issues, but there is a great Improvement using the 0.3mm setting. I also tried a 0.5 setting and that has given even better results so far. For my immediate project the 0.5 will suffice but I will be updating this project after it has proved it’s worth then I will try perfect the 0.3mm setting size 

 

Thanks for the tips and help gr5 👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[Surface Mode: 'Surface'/'Both' inner supports...]

Meant to say that the area to be infilled where you said to use diagonal for strength the ones in the pictures were test prints and I just used a 3 % infill. My reckoning was any type of infill to try get it to all work together. 
 

many thanks again Frank 

[Surface Mode: 'Surface'/'Both' inner supports...]

GR5 thank you for your reply it is much appreciated.

I have tried  a few of the ideas you have mentioned a few that I have not tried I will try them tomorrow and see what results I get. I understand where you are going with the 0.3mm but not tried it. I will let you know the outcome of more tests 

I sincerely appreciate you looking in the issue and taking the time to find  some answers for me.  I get great results from my printer and am now starting to push the boundaries, to get thinner and stronger prints for model gliders and aircraft in general.

 

best regards Frank 👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[Surface Mode: 'Surface'/'Both' inner supports...]

Hi I have the same problem is there an answer to this issue. I have a surface and a infill area that I need to print in the same print.  I have tried surface on both but the surface Is very broken up but the infill is perfect? If I use surface only my surface is perfect,  but I have no infill, therefore no strength where I need it.  How do I get both to work. My drawings wall thickness is 0.4mm and my infill is set to 10%.

 

Thanks Frank 

 

Hi the best way to describe what I am trying to achieve is best in the pictures attached. 

On the first picture the left is a thin wall fuselage drawn at 0.4 mm to be printed on my ender 5pro printer with a 0.4mm nozzle the left image is printed perfectly with the surface mode selected in special modes this is what I am needing for the outer skin (Surface) The right image in the first picture is showing the infill I need In the Square boxes that are left empty in the the left hand image of the first picture. Where they should be infilled. If I put surface mode to both in special mode then I get the correct infill but the other 2 pictures show the result of fuselage Surface which is full of gaps when printing with the both mode selected.  I can get a perfect surface  print or a perfect infill print. What I can’t seem to get is is the 2 together In one print. If I print same part with A wall thickness of 0.8mm I do not get this problem but that is defeating the object  I am trying to achieve.
I apologise for not being so clear in my earlier post  I hope this is clearer.

Thanks Frank

[Surface Mode: 'Surface'/'Both' inner supports...]

Hi I have the same problem is there an answer to this issue. I have a surface and a infill area that I need to print in the same print.  I have tried surface on both but the surface Is very broken up but the infill is perfect? If I use surface only my surface is perfect,  but I have no infill, therefore no strength where I need it.  How do I get both to work. My drawings wall thickness is 0.4mm and my infill is set to 10%.

 

Thanks Frank