Jump to content

NikThemechanic

Dormant
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NikThemechanic

  1. Thank you for the response, everyone.

    On 1/27/2018 at 1:33 PM, gr5 said:

    AA 0.4

    sendgcode M151 T0 A8 D7800000000004141
    sendgcode M151 T0 A16 D20302E3400000000

    BB 0.4

    sendgcode M151 T1 A8 D7800000000004242
    sendgcode M151 T1 A16 D20302E3400000000

    Honestly, I wouldn't know how to go about doing this. So it wasn't my first instinct.

     

    Although, I did run a test print and I've attached the print quality.

    Just to be very clear, I did not swap out the entire extruder assembly. I only used the hot end (the nozzle) from the AA0.4, all the other parts belonged to BB0.4

     

    The print came out fine. It wasn't as bad. Will print a few more parts and see how far it goes without screwing up.

    IMG_20180128_165047.jpg

    IMG_20180128_165617.jpg

    IMG_20180128_165622.jpg

    IMG_20180128_165632.jpg

  2. On 1/12/2018 at 6:59 AM, geert_2 said:

    I think it is very unlikely that you run out of filament unexpectedly, since before the start of a print you can see how full the spool still is. 

    1

    How do we see how full the spool is? I can't see that information on Cura when I prepare my print.

    I have never faced a blocked nozzle or any other issue during an ongoing print. We have 7 ultimakers installed in our makerspace and when someone starts a print overnight, it sucks to come back in the morning only to see the printer printing air.

    5 hours ago, herbw said:

    I am not a mechanical engineer, but here is the approach I would use:

     

    I would start with a gravity operated filament sensor in which the filament passes around a roller, causing a weight to be lifted. If filament is not present, the weight would drop. This mechanism would be mounted on a pivot. See diagram:

     

    sensor.png.2945f5318550a2f62fd2b1a2d3a7e33a.png

     

    I would use an optical switch. The weight would either block or allow light to pass, detecting whether the weight is raised or lowered, thereby detecting whether the filament is present or absent.

     

    The optical switch would be much more reliable than a mechanical switch, and the gravity operated sensor should also be reliable.

    We had Cubepros in the past and optical sensors they have pretty much gave it the bad reputation it has. Optical sensors gave a bunch of garbage values at times and we pretty much like the mechanical way which is why we preferred the Ultimakers over the Cubepros. Adding a mechanical limit switch is a foolproof way of sensing end of filament. 

  3. Hey,

    We have a bunch of Ultimaker Extended 3s. Two of the seven we have, can't print the support material since the BB0.4 nozzle is clogged. 

    It is really difficult to poke the clogged PLA out of the nozzle. We have 7 extra AA0.4 extruders that might never be used. I was wondering what the difference is between the two extruders. Is it the PCB board on the back that's different or is the nozzle different too? The nozzles have AA0.4 and BB0.4 mentioned on them.(pic attached). Could I swap the BB nozzle and use the AA nozzle instead? 

    Thanks.

    IMG_20180126_200026.jpg

  4. Coming back to this. Optical encoders might not be a very good solution to this problem. We have a bunch of Cubepros and the very main reason they breakdown is false error signal from the filament sensor/spool sensor. 

    Making the filament detector module monitor the length being used or the length of filament remaining seems unnecessary, atleast for me. 

    Having said that, I decided to go with a mechanical limit switch. Ideally, a NC limit switch would simply go off when the end of the filament passes through. This should pause the print. But there are 4 cables currently installed in the ultimaker 3 for filament detection. Could anyone help me figure out how I'd use these 4 cables and connect it to the limit switch such that every time the switch goes off, the print pauses.

    Not from an electrical domain, hence the post. 

    Thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...